But the diagram was vague, Aristarchus like, and only comprehensible to the underwater world after a few good cups of hot nuclear coffee.
In reality the Martian had just explained that mighty Allah was guiding his followers to the equal and opposite tidal forces constantly and naturally occurring across the centre of his earth. After the years of merciless and unintelligible suicide hooliganism on the spherical surface of the earth in his ever so powerful name, this was something that all the religions of the earth were able to happily rest their souls upon. It was going to be relative earth gravity at 90 degrees and not relative lunar gravity in a straight line that explained the high tides of the earth. And this was such good news to the earth's underwater world as well. In fact one swishing humpback whale quickly wrote a song entitled 'ocean heights, the centre of the earth and my blowhole'. It was for immediate release and went platinum in the Caribbean before the next low tide. Dolphins there all could be heard humming "we are now swimming in tidal champagne" as they lit pretend cigars from the real blow torches that were all focused on many thousands of equation drunk flat heads, each with their gills still blocked by Sir Isaac Newton's creepy lunar relativity.
In this dream the dead Martian's flashing and blinking had quite changed in nature from the earlier sloppy prehistoric earth turd sludging over crabs. Emitting the following words in an interplanetary sparkle code, the lights had turned into beautiful colourless diamonds on every fin of every fish on earth.
"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If Sir Isaac Newton's third law is a true science, if using Sir Isaac Newton's second law to measure weight is also a true science, this explanation of like tides occurring directly opposite each other across the centre of any planet cannot be wrong". With the entirety of the oceans of the earth all being fantastically illuminated, diamonds on fish fins were all saying the high tide on the other side of the earth is the equal and opposite reaction to the one on the moon side of the earth.
From nowhere, it seemed, crustaceans claws everywhere were suddenly and brightly touching onto their plan purchased galaxies and other waterproof internet devices. "Diamonds are a fishes best friend" was being serenaded into cyberspace with carefree abandon causing oxygen bubbles to waltz the Blue Danube to the tune of all known music. The lobsters joked to the fish that they couldn't really do internet. But, as it had been an otherwise slow news day, little conundrums like that weren't to bother the oceans of the earth very much at all. At long last they were beginning to enjoy an understanding of why they were experiencing their semi diurnal tidal bulges again and again and again as this earth rotated on its axis.
In these oceans of the earth, diamond finned fish were indeed a moment of true beauty for every strand of seaweed to observe and take a good deal of fine delight in to. The diamonds were explaining that the moon's inverse square law did not reach the earth at all. The age old banter of the earth's totally stupid tidal professors about the moon 'pulling' the earth was but a nude emperor, fiscally enhanced fins suddenly a little boy explaining this emperor belonged in clothes optional villages, not on the more regular university campuses at all.
In reality the Martian had just explained that mighty Allah was guiding his followers to the equal and opposite tidal forces constantly and naturally occurring across the centre of his earth. After the years of merciless and unintelligible suicide hooliganism on the spherical surface of the earth in his ever so powerful name, this was something that all the religions of the earth were able to happily rest their souls upon. It was going to be relative earth gravity at 90 degrees and not relative lunar gravity in a straight line that explained the high tides of the earth. And this was such good news to the earth's underwater world as well. In fact one swishing humpback whale quickly wrote a song entitled 'ocean heights, the centre of the earth and my blowhole'. It was for immediate release and went platinum in the Caribbean before the next low tide. Dolphins there all could be heard humming "we are now swimming in tidal champagne" as they lit pretend cigars from the real blow torches that were all focused on many thousands of equation drunk flat heads, each with their gills still blocked by Sir Isaac Newton's creepy lunar relativity.
In this dream the dead Martian's flashing and blinking had quite changed in nature from the earlier sloppy prehistoric earth turd sludging over crabs. Emitting the following words in an interplanetary sparkle code, the lights had turned into beautiful colourless diamonds on every fin of every fish on earth.
"To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If Sir Isaac Newton's third law is a true science, if using Sir Isaac Newton's second law to measure weight is also a true science, this explanation of like tides occurring directly opposite each other across the centre of any planet cannot be wrong". With the entirety of the oceans of the earth all being fantastically illuminated, diamonds on fish fins were all saying the high tide on the other side of the earth is the equal and opposite reaction to the one on the moon side of the earth.
From nowhere, it seemed, crustaceans claws everywhere were suddenly and brightly touching onto their plan purchased galaxies and other waterproof internet devices. "Diamonds are a fishes best friend" was being serenaded into cyberspace with carefree abandon causing oxygen bubbles to waltz the Blue Danube to the tune of all known music. The lobsters joked to the fish that they couldn't really do internet. But, as it had been an otherwise slow news day, little conundrums like that weren't to bother the oceans of the earth very much at all. At long last they were beginning to enjoy an understanding of why they were experiencing their semi diurnal tidal bulges again and again and again as this earth rotated on its axis.
In these oceans of the earth, diamond finned fish were indeed a moment of true beauty for every strand of seaweed to observe and take a good deal of fine delight in to. The diamonds were explaining that the moon's inverse square law did not reach the earth at all. The age old banter of the earth's totally stupid tidal professors about the moon 'pulling' the earth was but a nude emperor, fiscally enhanced fins suddenly a little boy explaining this emperor belonged in clothes optional villages, not on the more regular university campuses at all.
****Day 9 The stinking underwear of a mathematical physicist
THE SCIENCE OF MAKING WRONG RIGHT
This is the top of the mountain getting stressed. Professors and rocket scientists, if you want the view afresh from up here, you best open your eyes.
Now, if anyone of you is going to pretend to fire cannonballs off us mountain tops as a satellite launch, don't forget the motion of your launching pads around the galaxy. We are not static in space. In fact we are moving heaps faster than the relative speed of the cannonballs you are about to pretend to fire. And ask yourself. Is the circle truthfully down? You can click on this little diagram. It may help you realise the 8,000 metres is an ascent. Even for pretend cannonballs, the continual application of a lifting force is required for a continual ascent.
Now, if anyone of you is going to pretend to fire cannonballs off us mountain tops as a satellite launch, don't forget the motion of your launching pads around the galaxy. We are not static in space. In fact we are moving heaps faster than the relative speed of the cannonballs you are about to pretend to fire. And ask yourself. Is the circle truthfully down? You can click on this little diagram. It may help you realise the 8,000 metres is an ascent. Even for pretend cannonballs, the continual application of a lifting force is required for a continual ascent.
Professors, if you wake up from your seemingly eternal slumber, the physics of the galactic motion of the solar system is yours to now sort out. The current fixed star explanations of Kepler's work are archaic dross being spewed up by you when you should be living in respect of having discovered the motions of the stars. From the view of a gazing mountain top, the discovery of the motion's of the stars was one of the most interesting discoveries ever on earth. It has opened up the question of perpetual motion and the question of could there be observable motion if space is other than finite.
For now it looks like there is to be something unexpected but simple about the sun-earth-moon relationship for you to work through. A push system between the earth and the moon for the galactic journey of the moon to be sensible, unheard of but rational once you know the earth has an approximate straight line daily speed change of 0.512 km/sec. And can't cause a moon a like speed change without a system of alternating pushes between the earth and the moon, etc.
The wobble of the earth across its galactic path as the moon cycles the earth is not going to be caused by your constantly relocating joint centre of gravity nonsense. Most likely occurs as the push alternates.
Before to long be best to get on top something you haven't crunched up yet. And that is why a flywheel keeps turning or why a rolling wheel rolls.
For now it looks like there is to be something unexpected but simple about the sun-earth-moon relationship for you to work through. A push system between the earth and the moon for the galactic journey of the moon to be sensible, unheard of but rational once you know the earth has an approximate straight line daily speed change of 0.512 km/sec. And can't cause a moon a like speed change without a system of alternating pushes between the earth and the moon, etc.
The wobble of the earth across its galactic path as the moon cycles the earth is not going to be caused by your constantly relocating joint centre of gravity nonsense. Most likely occurs as the push alternates.
Before to long be best to get on top something you haven't crunched up yet. And that is why a flywheel keeps turning or why a rolling wheel rolls.
Every body perseveres in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by forces impressed.
Those words became what you have been relentlessly teaching as Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion. And contain what you have quite mindlessly been professing as Galileo's explanation of circular planetary motion. The planets would persevere in a straight line unless compelled otherwise.
The star's gravity is the otherwise compulsion that you have been teaching. So, in keeping with Galileo, you add the perseverance and the compulsion and you get an answer that may be going to be happily smiled at in all your universities right through to the next semester break.
Those words became what you have been relentlessly teaching as Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion. And contain what you have quite mindlessly been professing as Galileo's explanation of circular planetary motion. The planets would persevere in a straight line unless compelled otherwise.
The star's gravity is the otherwise compulsion that you have been teaching. So, in keeping with Galileo, you add the perseverance and the compulsion and you get an answer that may be going to be happily smiled at in all your universities right through to the next semester break.
So, a century or so after Galileo, Sir Isaac tells the visiting Edmond Halley the ellipse and mutual gravitation and his first law of motion would explain planetary motion in full. Sir Edmond gallops back to London to tell your Royal Society and this Royal Society says "wow". Whatever that story really was, your whole world is still saying "wow" to Galileo's original mistake. Your whole world should say at some stage "Sir Isaac planets can't ascend without the application of a lifting force".
Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion is two laws of motion in one. At least it is when your view is not impeded by professors strutting around a university campus releasing fixed sun farts all day long. If you ever move on from using errors of the past as knowledge of your today, you should see it isn't a fundamental law of anything. The first part is momentum = mass x velocity. That's your so called unchanging perseverance. The second part is Sir Isaac's second law. The administration of 'compulsion' from a force impressed.
One day you may get a clearer view of rolling wheels and the rudiments of the planets as pendulums of the sun's galactic journey. If you do you should be able to see that Sir Isaac's first law isn't a mechanical explanation of a resistance to a change of motion.
Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion is two laws of motion in one. At least it is when your view is not impeded by professors strutting around a university campus releasing fixed sun farts all day long. If you ever move on from using errors of the past as knowledge of your today, you should see it isn't a fundamental law of anything. The first part is momentum = mass x velocity. That's your so called unchanging perseverance. The second part is Sir Isaac's second law. The administration of 'compulsion' from a force impressed.
One day you may get a clearer view of rolling wheels and the rudiments of the planets as pendulums of the sun's galactic journey. If you do you should be able to see that Sir Isaac's first law isn't a mechanical explanation of a resistance to a change of motion.
The word 'perseverance' applied to a state of motion doesn't quantify a state of motion. But the belief that it does seems to happily consume you whatever us mountain tops sneakily embed in those of you putting those cannons on us. You now need to ask yourselves if a state of motion is maintained by the product of mass and velocity. Or mass its self. According to your own teaching, the answer can't be the latter. Mass is a scalar quantity. Not the vector quantity it would need to be if it was the reason of a state of motion. The vector quantity is the combination of mass and motion. Mass x velocity = uniform motion. Mass on its own = quantity.
In his off with my ever so perfect garden pixies principia tome, Sir Isaac Newton's rule one of reasoning in philosophy is : We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.
Mass is not the true cause of a state of motion. If you are a woken up professional professor, you need to think twice about teaching Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion as a fundamental law of the universe. Non motions, if there were such a thing, and all other motions are clearly and precisely defined as the product of mass and velocity. Not mass alone. Sir Isaac Newton's first law, as stated, is Sir Isaac Newton's second law reworded to include zero unbalanced force. The reading of innate force into Sir Isaac Newton's first law can only be done by those of ill will to themselves and mountain tops.
So professors, the only real purpose of Sir Isaac's first law of motion and his law of universal gravitation would be to enjoy the status of being the earth's high water myth mark.
This mark is encapsulated in full by your rarefied concept of mass existing in two forms that are the same. Belief that this equivalence is ultimate is seemingly the glue holding the euphoria of your professional farting in a very tight flying formation. For professors not so caught up in this wondrous pre-dawn fixed sun farting foray of mathematical physicists into their own lunch boxes, the two forms of mass are "inertial" mass and "gravitational" mass.
Inertial mass = gravitational mass = accurate Newton second law measurements of the same rock twice.
Not a rock simultaneously existing under two forms of mass that are identical except for a chosen word in front.
From the enduring field of vision of a mountain top, that sort of thing is very embarrassing for those of you with through the clouds intelligence to be farting out your backsides. When you measured 'inertial' mass and 'gravitational' mass to be equivalent, a scientific mind would have considered "Perhaps all we are doing is measuring the same quantity with different apparatus and getting the same answer both times. This might mean nothing except we are all rather good at measuring the same mass with different methods, our job is one of atonement for the on earth stupid academic mess Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton began with their public utterances about mass being the cause of the perseverance of motion".
Let's face it, professors. Exquisite fixed sun farters as you all undoubtedly are, you do all need to go back to school. To learn that the motions of the sun, earth and all other inverse square laws have been well and truly discovered. That both Sir Isaac's first law of motion and his mutual law of gravitation came to be in belief that the stars are fixed in space and are now the tail end of the misapprehensions of someone by the name of Aristotle. So professors, if you could pack a breath or two of moving sun fresh air, without further ado we will put you all in these cannons you have sitting on us and shoot you straight through to rotation rate school.
In his off with my ever so perfect garden pixies principia tome, Sir Isaac Newton's rule one of reasoning in philosophy is : We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.
Mass is not the true cause of a state of motion. If you are a woken up professional professor, you need to think twice about teaching Sir Isaac Newton's first law of motion as a fundamental law of the universe. Non motions, if there were such a thing, and all other motions are clearly and precisely defined as the product of mass and velocity. Not mass alone. Sir Isaac Newton's first law, as stated, is Sir Isaac Newton's second law reworded to include zero unbalanced force. The reading of innate force into Sir Isaac Newton's first law can only be done by those of ill will to themselves and mountain tops.
So professors, the only real purpose of Sir Isaac's first law of motion and his law of universal gravitation would be to enjoy the status of being the earth's high water myth mark.
This mark is encapsulated in full by your rarefied concept of mass existing in two forms that are the same. Belief that this equivalence is ultimate is seemingly the glue holding the euphoria of your professional farting in a very tight flying formation. For professors not so caught up in this wondrous pre-dawn fixed sun farting foray of mathematical physicists into their own lunch boxes, the two forms of mass are "inertial" mass and "gravitational" mass.
Inertial mass = gravitational mass = accurate Newton second law measurements of the same rock twice.
Not a rock simultaneously existing under two forms of mass that are identical except for a chosen word in front.
From the enduring field of vision of a mountain top, that sort of thing is very embarrassing for those of you with through the clouds intelligence to be farting out your backsides. When you measured 'inertial' mass and 'gravitational' mass to be equivalent, a scientific mind would have considered "Perhaps all we are doing is measuring the same quantity with different apparatus and getting the same answer both times. This might mean nothing except we are all rather good at measuring the same mass with different methods, our job is one of atonement for the on earth stupid academic mess Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton began with their public utterances about mass being the cause of the perseverance of motion".
Let's face it, professors. Exquisite fixed sun farters as you all undoubtedly are, you do all need to go back to school. To learn that the motions of the sun, earth and all other inverse square laws have been well and truly discovered. That both Sir Isaac's first law of motion and his mutual law of gravitation came to be in belief that the stars are fixed in space and are now the tail end of the misapprehensions of someone by the name of Aristotle. So professors, if you could pack a breath or two of moving sun fresh air, without further ado we will put you all in these cannons you have sitting on us and shoot you straight through to rotation rate school.
