On my behalf what you have been teaching your school children for over three hundred years is every particle in the universe is attracting every other particle in the universe. ((⏱️=1500))There is a mass multiplication formula that follows these introductory words of my so called law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1500))That formula purports to be the scientific connector of that preliminary prose about every particle of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))The mass multiplication formula has its own problems of logic. ((⏱️=1500))The pity of the world is my introductory words are based on a direction of fall being perfectly continuous. Having the potential to be cast an indefinite distance from any particle of the universe ((⏱️=2000))On account of all directions of fall being mathematically and easily demonstratable as finite extensions from there source particle, I sincerely apologize to the world for casting a malignant spell over your education systems for the last three and a half centuries. ((⏱️=2000))Here is hoping that all your nations can break free of my original misunderstanding of the entire universe that we are all a part of.
The delegates were turning to look around the room. Could this great planet that they were leading ((⏱️=500))somehow have become hexed into a state of disrepair after Sir Isaac Newton said he understood the universe when he had not at all ? ((⏱️=1500))A little off beat Sir Isaac went on to explain that mathematics itself was not the truth. 1 + 1 equals 2 was a useful tool of civilization he said. But it could never be proven as an absolute truth. He based this analysis on 1 being a unique circumstance. 1 + 1 equals 2 required a duplication of that unique circumstance to carry the truth of numbers it was expected to carry was his point. In the end a duplication of the unique is the work of unsound minds he stated. ((⏱️=500)) So, fundamentally, mathematics and reality were not and could never be connected by absolute truth. He went on to say there was the subconscious tendency of mathematicians to treat zero and infinity as digits even though they knew this was errant. All they knew was numbers. So they did not know how else to treat them. ((⏱️=500))Boringly he persisted with the sub truth nature of mathematics until finally getting to the fact that an alternation of direction of fall along an axis that ran between adjacent particles meant it was not rationally possible for every particle in the universe to be attracting every other particle in the universe.
Before explaining the hoodwink of my mass multiplication formula to you, the foundational irrationality of gravity having a mutually attractive nature is here. ((⏱️=3000))I at the time and no one since has supplied a rationale of how a particular direction of fall survives or persists through the region in space where ay direction of fall is alternating. ((⏱️=2000))The premise of mutual gravitation is that this opposite direction penetration must be happening throughout the universe.((⏱️=2000))At this juncture we either have to explain to ourselves how the coexistence of all opposite directions of fall throughout the universe is mathematically and scientifically truthful. ((⏱️=800))Or, alternatively, simply accept that the moon's tidal analysis is where our understanding of gravity should be beginning. ((⏱️=1500))The tides of the earth are explained by the fact that opposite directions of fall do not coexist within each other is the moon's point of view.((⏱️=1500)) Obviously until all your school teachers and professors are teaching one coherent reason to your children to explain the second high tide, the possibility that they are teaching false hoods to explain the tides is very real and very detrimental to the future of life on earth.
Delegates nodded their heads in a manner that suggested they wanted to hear more. Sir Isaac began to recite words from his book, principia. He was here to admit that a principle of mutual endowment between all the masses of the universe was only ever a guess. He was to say if he had of managed to mathematically assess that the high tide under the moon was simply a lesser weighting towards the earth and absolutely not a weighting towards the moon he would not have made such a bad guess about the universe.
Lastly, if it universally appears, by experiments and astronomical observations, that all bodies about the earth gravitate towards the earth, and that in proportion to the quantity of matter which they severally contain, that the moon likewise, according to the quantity of its matter, gravitates towards the earth; that, on the other hand, our sea gravitates towards the moon; and all the planets mutually one towards another; and the comets in like manner towards the sun; we must, in consequence of this rule, universally allow that all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle of mutual gravitation.
These are my words from all those years ago and I can only try and set the record straight. Universal and mutual need a differentiating between. If used with reference to gravity, gravity is universal of mass. If there is a mass, that mass has a gravity field. As far as I know this is true. And of course a gravity field is an acceleration field with the acceleration
The premise is every mass has gravity. The following premise or theory is every mass in the universe is therefore attracting every other mass in the universe. ((⏱️=1500))This may sound like a perfect logic to a school child. Unfortunately it is far from such.
The delegates were turning to look around the room. Could this great planet that they were leading ((⏱️=500))somehow have become hexed into a state of disrepair after Sir Isaac Newton said he understood the universe when he had not at all ? ((⏱️=1500))A little off beat Sir Isaac went on to explain that mathematics itself was not the truth. 1 + 1 equals 2 was a useful tool of civilization he said. But it could never be proven as an absolute truth. He based this analysis on 1 being a unique circumstance. 1 + 1 equals 2 required a duplication of that unique circumstance to carry the truth of numbers it was expected to carry was his point. In the end a duplication of the unique is the work of unsound minds he stated. ((⏱️=500)) So, fundamentally, mathematics and reality were not and could never be connected by absolute truth. He went on to say there was the subconscious tendency of mathematicians to treat zero and infinity as digits even though they knew this was errant. All they knew was numbers. So they did not know how else to treat them. ((⏱️=500))Boringly he persisted with the sub truth nature of mathematics until finally getting to the fact that an alternation of direction of fall along an axis that ran between adjacent particles meant it was not rationally possible for every particle in the universe to be attracting every other particle in the universe.
Before explaining the hoodwink of my mass multiplication formula to you, the foundational irrationality of gravity having a mutually attractive nature is here. ((⏱️=3000))I at the time and no one since has supplied a rationale of how a particular direction of fall survives or persists through the region in space where ay direction of fall is alternating. ((⏱️=2000))The premise of mutual gravitation is that this opposite direction penetration must be happening throughout the universe.((⏱️=2000))At this juncture we either have to explain to ourselves how the coexistence of all opposite directions of fall throughout the universe is mathematically and scientifically truthful. ((⏱️=800))Or, alternatively, simply accept that the moon's tidal analysis is where our understanding of gravity should be beginning. ((⏱️=1500))The tides of the earth are explained by the fact that opposite directions of fall do not coexist within each other is the moon's point of view.((⏱️=1500)) Obviously until all your school teachers and professors are teaching one coherent reason to your children to explain the second high tide, the possibility that they are teaching false hoods to explain the tides is very real and very detrimental to the future of life on earth.
Delegates nodded their heads in a manner that suggested they wanted to hear more. Sir Isaac began to recite words from his book, principia. He was here to admit that a principle of mutual endowment between all the masses of the universe was only ever a guess. He was to say if he had of managed to mathematically assess that the high tide under the moon was simply a lesser weighting towards the earth and absolutely not a weighting towards the moon he would not have made such a bad guess about the universe.
Lastly, if it universally appears, by experiments and astronomical observations, that all bodies about the earth gravitate towards the earth, and that in proportion to the quantity of matter which they severally contain, that the moon likewise, according to the quantity of its matter, gravitates towards the earth; that, on the other hand, our sea gravitates towards the moon; and all the planets mutually one towards another; and the comets in like manner towards the sun; we must, in consequence of this rule, universally allow that all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle of mutual gravitation.
These are my words from all those years ago and I can only try and set the record straight. Universal and mutual need a differentiating between. If used with reference to gravity, gravity is universal of mass. If there is a mass, that mass has a gravity field. As far as I know this is true. And of course a gravity field is an acceleration field with the acceleration
The premise is every mass has gravity. The following premise or theory is every mass in the universe is therefore attracting every other mass in the universe. ((⏱️=1500))This may sound like a perfect logic to a school child. Unfortunately it is far from such.
The story so far. The moon has explained the high tides afresh. The explanation is simple and understandable. Every professor and school teacher on earth knew they now had to get beyond teaching the tides through unclear sleight of hand interpretations from the past. Being as truthful as they could with their students was their exemplary goal. ((⏱️=1000))Currently the scene is shifting to the United Nations building in New York. After some tense negotiations, Sir Isaac Newton has signed an unrestricted come clean deal. The negotiations were with the future of humanity. An honorable agreement has been reached. Unconditionally no blame will be attached to Sir Isaac forever. Now, above the general assembly his fully materialized torso would appear. He would explain why he had impulsively multiplied masses together in a law of gravity that had only become sensible when it was broken back down to an original and truthful insight. This was the point of his reluctant return to earth. When he heard the thunderous applause as he appeared, his somber mood of conscience changed and he considered displaying his genius once again and explaining the reason of the universe was going to be the finite and infinitely inexact relationship between the circumference and the diameter of a circle. Instead he stuck to his task of troubled conscience and began his address as the applause began to die down.
Representatives of the many exalted nations of the earth. [[break=1000]]Thankyou. [[break=1500]]As you know I died a genius in seventeen twenty seven. [[break=1000]] Almost three hundred years ago. [[break=1000]]The appearance of my torso now should tell you that life beyond the body is at least half true. [[break=2000]]You may ask would such survival after death be the full truth?[[break=1500]] Well of course it is. [[break=1500]]Embarrassingly, my pants are not on. In my haste to get here, I forgot them. [[break=1500]]
The United Nations assembly was taken back by this. In their view of the universe, no dead personage would do a disorganized earthly return. [[break=1000]] Could this be a vaudeville act? Among the murmurs of disbelief, an undeterred Sir Isaac was to go on. ((⏱️=1500))By his own account a little disrobed but , as they were to find out, his talk was fully clothed in a love of days gone bye.
It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The apples were falling, the birds were singing. Every day of the week, I was putting pants on. Our academy, the Royal Society, became aware of what you know of as the inverse square law of diminishing acceleration towards the celestial bodies of the universe. We did through an analysis of Kepler's third law of planetary motion.Yes. It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The apples were falling, the birds were singing. Pants were being put on by one and all. Our academy, the Royal Society, became aware of what you know of as the inverse square law of diminishing acceleration towards the celestial bodies of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))This awareness was developed through an analysis of Kepler's third law of planetary motion. ((⏱️=800))This law was an absolute beauty. Except it should have been presented like this. To explain the inverse square law to you
Sir Isaac became long windead and unnecessarily esoteric at this stage. In short he explained the way Kepler had presented his third law was through orbital time multiplied by its self and distance from the sun cubed. Distance cubed was understandable as a volume. Time squared was meaningless. [[break=1000]]Even though velocity multiplied by velocity was also not of meaning, when the law of planetary motion was presented like it was here, the relative velocity of a planet was easily mathematically detectable as a consequence of the magnitude of the curved surface area around the sun at that planet's distance from the sun.((⏱️=1000)) We pick Sir Isaac up again as he gets to the actual inverse square law.
This animation shows the curved surface area around a celestial mass in a manner that increases as the mass is moved away from. ((⏱️=1500))As the arrows towards the celestial mass indicate, in direct proportion the rate of acceleration towards the celestial mass is decreasing with the curved surface area increase around the celestial mass. ((⏱️=1500))That is the inverse square law of acceleration rate diminish that we derived from Kepler's third law of planetary motion all those years ago. ((⏱️=1500)) If the nations of the earth wish to understand what I began referring to as gravity, this is where you begin. We know the acceleration is towards the mass. Consideration needs to be given to the force that causes that acceleration being in the opposite direction to the actual acceleration.
This animation shows the curved surface area around a celestial mass in an increasing manner. [[break=1500]]As the arrows towards the celestial mass indicate, in direct proportion the rate of acceleration towards the celestial mass is decreasing with the area increase. [[break=1500]]That is the inverse square law of acceleration rate diminish that we derived from Kepler's third law of planetary motion all those years ago. [[break=1500]] If the nations of the earth wish to understand what I began referring to as gravity, this is where you begin. We know the acceleration is towards the mass. Consideration needs to be given to the force that causes that acceleration being in the opposite direction to the actual acceleration
Sir Isaac's statement about the force being in the opposite direction to the acceleration caused a ripple of murmurs to work it's way around the building. The delegates were all aware of the curious diagram that the moon had presented in an earlier video. This diagram had what were presumably force arrows pointing away from the earth. The arrows pointed through particulate space that fitted with an inverse square law design around the earth.((⏱️=2000))
As the murmurs subsided, Sir Isaac was seen looking at his phone. He had been hoping for a message from a Manhattan tailor about a new set of breeches. Instead the message was from the moon. It contained encouragement to hurry up. According to the moon, the next generation of school children was waiting for and in great need of what his mistake was secluding from them. Evidently the moon was sure there was a direct relationship between the turn rates of gravity fields and the turn rates or day lengths of the celestial body within that gravity field. ((⏱️=1500))Amidst the tensions between Nations, if this was true it would indeed be something new and intellectually helpful for the next generation of school children to be growing into and texting each other about as they took the world over from previous generations. ((⏱️=1500))For now, getting a text from the moon was reminding Sir Isaac that it was a moon shot calculation that made his law of gravity a mathematical impossibility at first base.
In brief the reason I multiplied masses together was this. In an inappropriate use of my second law twice I confused an acceleration and the cause of that acceleration. ((⏱️=2000))I will get back to that matter later. ((⏱️=2000))Relative to the earth, the same face of the moon is always towards the earth. According to the moon, the reason for this is the moon's rotation is locked to the rotation of its gravity field. ((⏱️=1500))Now, I have just received a message from the moon saying the uncovering of my mass multiplication mistake is going to cause an academic revolution here on earth. That revolution will need an anchor point. You have one waiting in the wings. Similar to the Kepler third law relative velocity table becoming the anchor point of what we call the Copernican academic revolution, the rotation rate table that the telescope has developed is the clear light on the other side of my mistake. ((⏱️=1500))What this means is you have prima facie evidence of the rotation rates of gravity fields being the key to the rotation rates of the planets. And also of a connection between the rotation rates of adjacent planets. ((⏱️=1500))Of course prima facie evidence is not proof. But it does give your academics direction to achieve an understanding of why there is twenty four hours in an earth day as they set about casting aside my mass multiplication mistake for the future good of the world.
Thanks to the telescope, the rotation rate table had become more and more accurate over the past one hundred years. The problem was the telescope didn't have a human personality.((⏱️=1000)) By and large telescope operators were government employees.((⏱️=1000)) Their state of consciousness was at a lower level than what the universe required. That is if its reason was going to be unfurled here on planet earth. Sir Isaac went on.
No sirens went off. The building emptied in under three minutes. Everyone present knew that high society sensibility was about to explode. The force couldn't possibly be in the opposite direction to the falling apple of their education systems.[[break=3000]] Around half an hour later it was understood that high society sensibilities had not exploded after all. [[break=1000]] As the members began filing back in, they saw Sir Isaac was gazing quizzically at the latest iPhone. [[break=1000]] His intention was to ring around Manhattan for a store that sold his style of breeches. ((⏱️=1500))As the members settled back down, he put this task to one side and moved his discourse into what he was to call the true law of gravity..
If you haven't heard, it was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The sun was shining, The birds were singing. Apples were falling. ((⏱️=1500))Yes there is a rate of acceleration towards a celestial mass. And that acceleration diminishes in accordance with the so described inverse square law. We, the Royal Society, proposed that the cause of that acceleration was the celestial mass its self. ((⏱️=2000))Modern humility prevents me from saying who of our academy first proposed that the rate of acceleration towards a celestial mass was directly proportional to the magnitude of the mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the centre of the mass that the acceleration was happening. ((⏱️=2000))Whether several caveats or provisos, that is the true law of gravity of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))I can only apologize for attempting to develop that truth into a false law of mutual gravitation from there.
The first proviso Sir Isaac spoke of, [[break=800]] the moon had already given a gold mine explanation to in a previous video. [[break=1000]]The rate of acceleration towards the centre of the earth is measured to be decreasing beneath the surface of the earth. [[break=1000]]As it should be according to standard mathematical reasoning. [[break=1000]]So this true law of gravity that Sir Isaac was highlighting in contrast to his mistaken mutual one was not true at all beneath the surface of the earth or the surface of any other celestial body. [[break=2000]]The other proviso was the rate of acceleration above the surface of a celestial body was never precise from the perspective of a falling body. This was because the rate of acceleration was increasing the further the body fell. [[break=1500]] With those provisos mentioned, Sir Isaac explained that this law of gravity was the law that carried what we know as the universal gravity constant. ((⏱️=1500))In what we were teaching as Cavendish experiments, the small masses were only used to measure an acceleration towards a larger mass. The actual magnitude of the smaller mass was irrelevant to the derivation of the constant. ((⏱️=2000))Now, in what seemed to be an irrelevancy to the topic at hand, Sir Isaac went on to explain what his second law is
If you were able to avoid the bubonic plague, of course it was the best of times. Unfortunately, the original abuser of Newton’s second law was an outstanding mathematical genius. In its purest form, my second law simply says the rate of acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the magnitude of the force causing the acceleration and inversely proportional to the mass magnitude being accelerated.