I was going back to be  and was a bit worried about Abraham after his ordeal. I said good night Bram we woken you up. I was expected him to be adult but he was young and got up to do something Love you bram

I asked Abraham if he bore in life. When I looked at him there was a few tears in his eyes. Gee Bramm hope eveythhing is ok. Just love you forever/

Welcome to Tahiti.  We are here to do the high tides and also say academia is having its trouble disowning Sir Isaac Newton in favor of Albert Einstein.

Well, Professors have taken to saying  Newtonian gravity is a good approximation but Einstein's. That one is more exact.

When it comes to the high tide under the moon, that definitely is not the case. Einstein removes a Newtonian vector. The high tide under the moon  explanations of the two men are not an approximation of each other at all.

Yes Sir Isaac assessed that the moon is pulling the ocean towards the moon. This pull idea still predominates the class rooms of our great planet.

But Einstein gravity says the pull vector should not be there.  It does not exist. His space time gravity has objects simply moving along curves throughout the universe.  The high tide under the moon to Einstein is due to the earth and moon's combined warping of space time.. This results in a lesser ocean weight under the moon without the moon having a pull vector towards its self at all. Not in Albert's theory.

So, if Einstein has understood gravity, the Newtonian tidal pull diagrams for the high tide under the moon  are a class room lie.

 For the second high tide, the one on the other side of the earth, Einstein returns to Newton's line of thought.

In part at least. A decreasing moon influence across the diameter of the earth causes the ocean to rise away from the moon on that far side of the earth in both theories.  Einstein also adds in the convergence of the moon's space time curvature towards the moon is squeezing the earth a little bit. 

Here on Tahiti we give points to Einstein for seeing the high tide under the moon as a lesser weight without a pull vector in an opposite direction towards the moon. We take  many points away from him, though, for abandoning the inverse square law.

The inverse square law is a meeting of geometry and mathematics In the space that surrounds this great planet. It was a treason to throw it out for observer dependent space time logic that requires time to have several definitions.

Both men lose lots and lots of points for seeing either their inverse square laws or their effects of mass upon their space time fabric as being unimpeded influences that extend indefinitely through the universe from a particular mass.

To get the class room away from quasi infinite gravity extensions,   what our wonderful teachers and professors need to mathematically do is apply rigorous subtraction along the earth moon axis.

This serves dual purposes. Firstly it removes indefinite extensions. Secondly the subtracting explains why we observe a high tide under the moon. The termination of the earth and moon gravities along the axis is inducing a relativity effect in each other's gravity field.

The point of termination is not at a fixed distance from either body. It is where a moonshot will leave our earth gravity field and enter the moon gravity field.

On our side of the termination is the lesser ocean weight resting on an ocean floor under the moon that we call a high tide.

What's more, the ball squeezing demonstration that we have just seen does say is this. Through Newton's third law, the lesser weight is traceable right down to and ACROSS  the center of a round planet like ours is. That does give us the basis of why we observe like tides on direct opposite sides of the earth. When you are following Newton and Einstein and their concepts of the moon gravity actually existing within the earth gravity field, you are not at all in position to see the second high tide through Newton's third law. You are still theorizing..

With a hope and a prayer you go with what Sir Isaac came up with and doubted himself about a decreasing moony gravity strength causing a reversal vector in the earth's gravity field. Or perphaps you throw in joint centers of gravity, which Einstein didn't like much, and the earth system producing a centrifugal effect as it swings around a joint earth center of gravity.  The Newtonian pull vector breaks down with moon shot arithmetic. Einstein's theory fails to recognize gravity fields as separate entities entirely. 

[long pause]Sorry boys and girls. [thoughtful] Across the internet and in your class rooms you [sexily]will find many intonations that say the moon is actually pulling an ocean to form a high tide under the moon.[pause] In formula form this strictly traces back to Sir Isaac Newton mass multiplication [emphatic]explanation of the universe. [pause]In contrast and without being concise, Albert Einstein's explanation of the [alluring]high tide under the moon is it is a lesser [emphatic]weighting towards the earth without being a weighting towards the moon [smile]at all.[long pause]

Interestingly, you will also find that academics will describe Newtonian gravity as a good  approximation whereas Einsteinian gravity is the more exact one. Sometimes academics are not all that serious.  A lesser weight one way and  a pull the opposite way can not be written down as two gravity explanations being approximately the same.

Verbose and carrying time misconceptions as his equations go, Albert Einstein is the one with the technically right explanation of the high tide under then. This high tide is simply a lesser weight towards the earth without being a weighting towards the moon at all. When the internet and school teachers stop with the moon pulls an ocean, it will be a decent step forward for the whole wide world.

Not by following Einstein's muddles and entanglements and potentially infinite gravity extensions,  what our wonderful teachers and internet providers needs to mathematically do is apply rigorous subtraction along the earth moon axis.[pause] When this is done we clearly see [extremely sexily]that the tidal roles [short pause][sexily]of the moon and earth gravity fields are ones of subtracting fall rate magnitudes from each other.[pause][strong Polynesian accent]​This results in a mutual termination of both gravity fields in between the earth and the moon.[pause] 

The point of termination is not at a fixed distance from either body. [pause]It is where a moonshot will leave our earth gravity field and enter the moon gravity field. [pause]On our side of the termination is the lesser ocean weight resting on an ocean floor under the moon that we call a high tide. [pause][strong Polynesian accent]​What's more, the ball [highly sexily]squeezing demonstration that we have just seen does say [romantic]is this. Through Newton's third law, the lesser weight is traceable right down to and [emphasis][sexily][short pause]ACROSS [short pause] the center of a round planet like ours is. That does give us the basis of why we observe like tides on direct opposite sides of the earth. When you are following Newton and Einstein and their concepts of the moon gravity actually existing within the earth gravity field, you are not at all in position to see the second high tide through Newton's third law and that is the shame of the ages.

For the second high tide Einstein reverted to Newtonian logic of a decreasing moon influence across the diameter of the earth causing the ocean on the far side of the earth to ascend from the moon.  [pause]It must be stated that we are ignoring[short pause][very sexily] the sun's gravity for this simple gravity termination demonstration about why we observe a high tide [sexily]under the moon. [pause]Which, incidentally, we do not exactly observe here on Tahiti.[pause] [strong Polynesian accent]​

That is a story of ocean currents. [short pause]Not a story directly of the earth moon [excited]relationship. [pause]As you can see, the [romantically]Nasa Einstein based image has our earth and moon gravity fields as distinct separate and terminating entities. [pause]The Newtonian gravity extensions by multiplication are [seductively]nowhere to be seen and never ever will be [pause][sexily][strong Polynesian accent]​

If you can excuse us, figuratively we need to snorkel Sir Isaac and Albert explanations of the second high tide out of Pacific Island minds and figuratively do it before [seductively] Captain James Cook drops anchor [romantically, sexily]here for a Venus transit..[pause] [strong Polynesian accent]​If we were to see James in this day and age, we could tell James it looks like the impetus for the Venus inverse square law to turn backwards comes from the earth sun tidal axis passing through the Venus inverse square law during an alignment of the Venus, earth and sun  inverse square laws every five hundred and eighty five earth days. [long pause][long pause] must[I love you feeling] be quick. [long pause] edit off

Well hello. We now know that we are on a turning planet. What is going to be said here is  gravity field turn rates govern the turn rates and hence day lengths of  planets. If this is right a new world state of consciousness would be awaiting us.

Well, neither Sir Isaac Newton or Albert Einstein were on the gravity path towards  understanding much about why we have 24 hours in a day.  With Sir Isaac, he  freely articulated that he didn't know why or how gravity was doing its thing. What he did understand is the way the rate of fall above a mass is diminishing as the area around the mass is increasing. This rule is known as the inverse square law of gravity strength diminishment. Sir Isaac also had a realistic idea of a direct relationship between a mass magnitude and its gravity strength. 

What Sir Isaac had critically wrong  was every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.  What Albert Einstein at least arguably had understood was the implication or suggestion that the force responsible for gravity is an exertion of mass upon space.  What Albert categorically did in error  was denoting time as a fourth dimension. One that is  in a physical union with the three spatial dimensions of length, width and breadth. 

Albert was seeing a mass warping his unified time and space to cause a gravity field. Albert's main problem, though, was requiring equations for his understanding of gravity to exist.  Albert Einstein did not understand that equations explain relationships. Equations do not explain how or why.  One apple equally one apple does not explain the nature of an apple. Particularly as no two apples are ever  exactly the same. 

In this lead  in depiction of  the earth's gravity field turning backwards to produce our 24 hour in an earth day in direct  conjunction  with  Venus and Mars gravity fields also turning backwards, the first problem to address is Sir Isaac's errant idea of the multiplication of two masses together. Sir Isaac did this in his endeavor  to explain every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.

Like Newton, Einstein also had the reach range of acceleration towards a particular mass being potentially infinite. During the course of this video, it will become obvious  that adjacent gravity fields are limiting the extent of each other's reach.

It is simple moonshot arithmetic that tells us that gravity fields are quite finite. Meaning whatever successes that are being attributed to Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein to date, they have both missed seeing the limited nature of a the gravity fields they aspired to understand.  Also a greater travesty than Albert Einstein's space time are land mines, bombs and other uncivilized acts designed to destroy humanity.

Good luck Recently transferred from Weebly on your recommendation. Have been unable to transfer my domain name across. Recently got an email form Weebly saying my account will renew soon. If I terminate with Weebly will I lose my domain?  Also does not seem to be an undo redo option with Articulation as belowAm happy that I can use articulation on my phone. Sorry to be troubling you but help with this matters would be appreciated. Thanks George Kingston. riachella68@gmail.coworld. This is going to be pretty heavy. Will try and keep it as light as possible. By going against the inverse square law nature of a gravity field, Albert Einstein committed treason against the Copernican revolution.  His mitigating circumstance. Sir Isaac Newton had wrongly delivered the multiplication of two masses together to explain the gravity of the universe  several centuries earlier. Albert sensed Sir Isaac needed correcting. What he did though  was invent a nonsense that was to be called space time gravity. To begin we do what Albert should have done.  Which is address Sir Isaac's multiplication of masses mistake. During that process Albert's treason against the inverse square law should become apparent.   The head of a physics department has encouraged publication against the way gravity education is currently headed. The bottom line for anybody is the tides are our path out of  our garden of Eden untruth and into the universe.  Ukraine is currently teaching us that truth is a winner and Arguably a greater treason against humanity than Albert are landmines. So we begin with an image of the broken c

Good luck world. This is going to be pretty heavy. Will try and keep it as light as possible. By going against the inverse square law nature of a gravity field, Albert Einstein committed treason against  Copernican revolution.  His mitigating circumstance. Sir Isaac Newton had wrongly delivered the multiplication of two masses together to explain the gravity of the universe  several centuries earlier. Albert sensed Newton  needed a correction. What he did though  was invent  a nonsense that was to called space time gravity. The head of a physics department has encouraged publication against all this.  With a bit of luck highlighting the discovery of the motion of the sun and its gravity field will help things along. Then explaining the tides through moonshot arithmetic and Newton's third law should simplify the mystery of mathematical physics into the gobbledygook that it is.  After that these modern planetary rotation relationship tables brought into a finite rotating gravity field light should lead the Copernican revolution away from equations to explain the universe and back to common sense to do the same. 

[strong Polynesian accent]​hello[long pause] Sorry boys and girls. [short pause][seductively]When your teacher is wrong. [pause][smiling]About the tides. [pause]The good [sexily]news. [pause][highly sexily][emphatic]THIS OCEAN IS NOT WEIGHTED OR PULLED TOWARDS THE MOON AT ALL.[pause] [curious love]The moon only causes this ocean to be weighted [emphatic]LESS towards the center of our earth.[pause][emphatic][mildly

raised voice]WITHOUT BEING A WEIGHT TOWARDS THAT MOON AT ALL. [strong Polynesian accent]​[pause]When a teacher says the moon [emphasis]PULLS the earth, the teacher is having a counter factual class room moment. [pause]What our wonderful teachers need to mathematically do is apply rigorous subtraction along the earth moon axis.[pause] When this is done we clearly see [extremely sexily]that the tidal roles [short pause][sexily]of the moon and earth gravity fields are ones of subtracting fall rate magnitude from each other.[pause][strong Polynesian accent]​This results in a mutual termination of both gravity fields in between the earth and the moon.[pause] The point of termination is not at a fixed distance from either body. [pause]It is where a moonshot will leave our earth gravity field and enter the moon gravity field. [pause]On our side of the termination is the lesser ocean weight resting on an ocean floor under the moon that we call a high tide. [pause][strong Polynesian accent]​What's more, the ball [highly sexily]squeezing demonstration that we have just seen does say [romantic]the lesser weight is traceable right down to and [emphasis][sexily][short pause]ACROSS [short pause] the center of a round planet like ours is. [pause]It must be stated that we are ignoring[short pause][very sexily] the sun's gravity for this simple gravity termination demonstration about why we observe a high tide [sexily]under the moon. [pause]Which, incidentally, we do not exactly observe here on Tahiti.[pause] [strong Polynesian accent]​That is a story of ocean currents. [short pause]Not a story directly of the earth moon [excited]relationship. [pause]As you can see, the [romantically]Nasa image has our earth and moon gravity fields as distinct separate and terminating entities. [pause]The Newtonian gravity extensions by multiplication are [seductively]nowhere to be seen and never ever will be [pause][sexily][strong Polynesian accent]​ Albert Einstein's equations do not recognize moon shot arithmetic in their understanding of the high tide under the moon. [pause]Now that Albert's name has been mentioned, a head ache is coming on. [pause]If you can excuse me, figuratively I need to snorkel it away and do it before [seductively] Captain James Cook drops anchor [romantically, sexily]here for a Venus transit..[pause] [strong Polynesian accent]​If we were to see James in this day and age, we could be telling him to bypass Albert and that  man's strange  abandonment of the inverse square law.[pause][strong Polynesian accent]​We could tell James it looks like the impetus for the Venus inverse square law to turn backwards comes from the earth sun tidal axis passing through the Venus inverse square law during an alignment of the Venus, earth and sun  inverse square laws every five hundred and eighty five earth days. [long pause][long pause] must[I love you feeling] be quick. [long pause] edit off

This explaining of the tides and planetary motion afresh comes from a secondary school education. One that saw where the world of the Copernican revolution was wrong. After encouragement to publish by the head of a physics department, studying just what Einstein's theories became unavoidable. Right mathematics wrong physics is all that can be said about them. In the video it is suggested that it would be the Newton third law explanation of the second high that professor's encouragement stemmed from. That interpretation of proceedings may not be correct. The professor can explain his motivation for himself. Plausibly though his conscience was touched by this table. Anybody with a university background should be able to understand that Einstein's equation will never explain the day lengths of the planets. The table was there for the professor to see during and after the short meeting. With respect of Einstein's, the abandonment of the inverse square law is an act of treason against the world in general. A shameful thing to have done.Sir Isaac Newton and Sir Isaacs acceptance of the inverse square law. The word treason would not be applicable to Sir Isaacs multiplication of masses but it is in the area. Scholarship can keep any mathematical process p

ey say the center of the earth is underneath me. The world is round so that does make sense. Now, If you fell under the spell of Albert Einstein back in the day, to break the spell you may need what you call time dilation addressed.  First  Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein had various ways of dealing with gravity decreasing underneath the surface of the earth. It is measured to do so in  the various  mines that are being dug for the extraction of underground treasure. Newton's address of this or a weightless center of the earth never made sense at all. He relied on the pull of mass above the center off setting the pull of mass from the center. Under this rationale the world would fall apart. Albert believed he was eliminating force completely from gravity. He was just seeing gravity as an acceleration towards mass. He may have erred in theorizing that time was a part cause of this. Otherwise this is where Albert caused an advancement of gravity understanding beyond Sir Isaac. All we observe gravity to be  is an acceleration through space towards a mass. If the acceleration of a  mass is impeded, the result is that mass becomes forceful. It becomes weight. Under Einstein's rationale what holds the upper earth upon its weightless core is surface weight. Which is virtually a self evident truth. Albert's removal of pull from gravity was commendable. It didn't for Albert, but seeing gravity as the cause of weight makes the more  simple Newton third law explanation of the second high tide undeniable. At least it does if there is an equal and opposite force to every force.. Albert though wanted to explain that second high along the lines of Sir Isaac. By placing a relativity in the moon's inverse square law.  The only way a sense can be made of the that is if the the center of the earth is employed as a demarcation point of the effect of the moon's gravity upon the earth. On one side of the center the moon is causing a weight towards its self. On the other side the decreasing rate of fall towards the moon is causing a weight of the earth away from the moon. There is also an idea in some school books of the earth and moon swinging around a joint center of gravity that is inside the earth to cause that second high tide as a centrifugal force. Here in the Maldives we can see the logic of the Newton third law explanation of the second high tide. Without going into a post Newton Einstein theory of what gravity actually is at this stage, this explanation does explain why that second high tide is a slightly lesser one. Whether or not the moon has already left the earth's gravity field, the effect of the earth's gravity field extends  further from the center of the earth on one side of the earth than the other. If the moon has already left the earth's gravity, it means that the sun is the base reason of the tides but the moon is moving those solar inspired tides around the earth as it performs its 28 day cycle of the earthh. 

 There may be arguments about which religion first saw the circle as the reason of the universe. Here is laos we say it is Bhudism Of course the circle could be another wrong answer. The original nothing to a bhudist is length width and breath. space.  

[short pause] These hills are  not alive with Albert Einstein's diabolical union of space and time.[pause]That is for sure. [pause]Albert was born a few hours from here and, like most other Germans, lived and died in tidal ignorance. [pause]A few centuries before Albert was making his gravity mistakes, Sir Isaac Newton was setting in place the notion of  instantaneous gravity governed by an inverse square law.. [short pause]Sir Isaac was puzzled by how gravity could get from A to B at all let alone instantly, though. [short pause]He left that quandary as a challenge for future science with these words. [long pause]

"That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else... is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no [sigh]man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it."[long pause]

Sir Isaac's silent exclusion of [whispers]his opposite sex from falling into absurdity would be its own narrative but [sigh]the sad school book truth is Sir Isaac had no right stating every particle in the universe attracts every other particle in the universe as the law of the universe after this convoluted admission of gravity ignorance. [short pause]Albert Einstein saw Sir Isaac's words as an opportunity to display mathematical prowess those few centuries later. [short pause]Albert went and built an entire gravity theory on the idea of gravity  not being instantaneous. [short pause]He began with the knowledge that light takes 8 minutes to get from the sun to the earth. [pause]From there his reckoning became that gravity is restricted to the speed of light in its journeys between the A and Bees of the universe. [short pause]Then, in a strange gravity move, he replaced the inverse square law that we have been looking at with what he was to be calling space time.[short pause] [angry]To do this Einstein converted time into distance by multiplying time by the speed of light and joined space and time together from there. [short pause]The obvious Einstein problem his peers should have been pointing out to him is that time and distance are disparate entities. [short pause]Time is an agreed method of counting cycles. [short pause] Without numbers, time is a sensation of change.[short pause] In contrast, a conceptual existence of distance is not number dependent.[short pause]Converting time into a dimension akin to length, width and breadth was not really a possible thing for Einstein to do.[short pause]As you can see here, when any considered magnitude of time is multiplied by any velocity at all, time its self is cancelled out.[short pause]What is left is only distance.[short pause] A multiplication of time and velocity can not provide a basis for empirical space time as Einstein and the world since has been musing. [short pause]Whatever definition of time is being employed by a modern physicist, beyond the cancelling out, time is not taking any part in whatever space time is being considered to be or not be.[short pause] In reality what Einstein was attempting to build was four dimensional space, not space time. [short pause]Which is not all that bad an enterprise to undertake. [pause] Logically the fourth dimension is the end of the first three dimensions. [pause] Albert just confused time with the end of space after reading Sir Isaac's words about what a competent human being could or couldn't do. [long pause]Today any physicist or professor who uses Einstein's space time has some explaining to do to themselves and also to their students about what they see time as and about how time is actually  partaking in Einstein's space time. [smile][pause]Thank you for looking at this recognition of Albert  Einstein's problems from the [whispers]entertainment of the Bavarian alps.[long pause] edit off

Managed to get down here.((⏱️=800)) We are four kilometers underground in a deep South African gold mine. ((⏱️=1000))A good a place to  highlight the center of the Earth and the earth's gravity field in general.((⏱️=800))

In deep mines like this, our scientific instruments measure exactly what physical mathematics dictates they should.((⏱️=800)) Which is a decrease in the rate of fall towards the center of the planet. ((⏱️=800))Mathematically the earth's core is weightless and it is weight above the core that holds the overall earth upon that core.  ((⏱️=800))Unfortunately neither Albert Einstein and Newton had understood the tides through moonshot arithmetic and Newton's Third Law.  ((⏱️=800))They both had headed down uneducated paths when it came to understanding the nature of gravity.((⏱️=1000)) In essence Newton relied on instantaneous gravity.((⏱️=800)) He was deeply puzzled by how gravity could get from A to B.((⏱️=800)) He left that quandary as a challenge for future science with these words. ((⏱️=800))

"That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else... is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it."

((⏱️=800))The sad truth is he had no right stating every particle in the universe attracts every other particle in the universe after  that admission of gravity ignorance. ((⏱️=800))Anyway Albert Einstein saw these  challenging words as an opportunity to display mathematical prowess a few centuries later. ((⏱️=800))He built an entire gravity theory on the idea that gravity is not instantaneous. ((⏱️=800))It is restricted by the speed of light became his reckoning, ((⏱️=800))Then, in a strange gravity move, he replaced the inverse square law with what he was calling space time.((⏱️=800)) Einstein converted time into distance by multiplying time  by the speed of light and joined space and time together from there. ((⏱️=800))Time is best defined as an agreed method of counting cycles.((⏱️=800)) Time needs numbers to exist. ((⏱️=800)) Otherwise it is just a sensation of change.((⏱️=800)) Unlike time, distance is not subject to numbers  to conceptually exist. ((⏱️=800))Converting time into a dimension akin to length, width and breadth was peculiar and nonsensical mathematical approach to the universe. ((⏱️=800))When time is multiplied by any velocity at all, time its self is cancelled out.((⏱️=800)) What is left is algebraically left is distance.((⏱️=800)) Such a multiplication of time and velocity definitely does not provide a basis for empirical space time as Einstein mistakenly believed it did. ((⏱️=800))Whatever definition of time is being employed by a modern physicist, beyond the cancelling out, time is not is taking any part in whatever they are considering space time to be.((⏱️=800)) What Einstein was attempting to build was nothing more than four dimensional space, which, in itself, is a mad contradiction of terms.((⏱️=800)) Any physicist who has abandoned the inverse square law in favor of Einstein's space time has some explaining to do about what they see as time and about how time is actually present in Einstein's space time.((⏱️=800)) 

Got down here. We are four kilometers underground in a deep South African gold mine. A good a place as any to be to  highlight the center of the Earth and the earth's gravity field in general.

In deep mines like this, our scientific instruments measure exactly what physical mathematics dictates they should. Which is a decrease in the rate of fall towards the center of the planet. Mathematically the earth's core is weightless and it is weight above the core that holds the overall earth upon that core. 

Newton and Albert Einstein dealt with the center of a gravity field in different but equally problematic ways. Unfortunately neither had understood the tides through moonshot arithmetic and Newton's Third Law.  In essence Newton relied on instantaneous gravity. He was deeply puzzled by how gravity got from A to B. He left that quandary as a challenge for future science with these words. 

"That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else... is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it."

Einstein saw these  challenging words as a an opportunity to display mathematical prowess a few centuries later. He built an entire gravity theory on the idea that gravity is not instantaneous but restricted by the speed of light, that, in contrast to Newton, gravity takes time to get from A to B. Then, in a strange gravity move, he replaced the inverse square law with what he was calling space time. Einstein converted time into distance by multiplying time  by the speed of light and joined space and time together inside his head from there. Now time is best defined as an agreed method of counting cycles. It needs numbers to exist. Otherwise it is undefinable. Distance is not subject to numbers  to conceptually exist like that. Converting time into a dimension akin to length, width and breadth was indeed a peculiar and, on the face of it, a nonsensical mathematical approach to the universe. When time is multiplied by any velocity at all, time its self is cancelled out. What is left is distance. Such a multiplication of time and velocity definitely does not provide a basis for empirical space time as Einstein evidently has believed it did in early internal combustion engine Europe.. Whatever concept of time is being employed by a physicist, beyond the cancelling out, time is not taking is taking any part in whatever space time is being considered to be. What Einstein was attempting to build was nothing more than four dimensional space, which, in itself, is a contradiction of terms. Any physicist who has abandoned the inverse square law in favor of Einstein's space time has some explaining to do about what they see as time and about how time is actually present in Einstein's space time. Time for the world to resurface.

Well here we are, four kilometers underground in a deep South African mine. With the Vatican seemingly urgent to begin acknowledging moving-sun planetary motion mechanics, it's time we tidy up what is left of Sir Isaac Newton’s tidal mistake.

Being so far underground is a right and proper  place to consider the center of the Earth, and what lies above  the other side of its core relative to this side. In deep mines like this, our instruments measure exactly what physical mathematics dictates they should: a decrease in the rate of fall towards the center of the Earth. Mathematically the planet's core is weightless. The above mass inverse square law of a gravity field breaks down under the surface of mass—marking the beginning of the journey to a weightless  core.

Newton and Einstein dealt with this mechanical reality in flawed, entirely different ways. Unfortunately  neither understood the tides through moonshot arithmetic method and Newton's Third Law.  Both fundamentally were pursuing errant lines of thought when it came to the physics of the center of the earth.

Newton relied on instantaneous gravity. He was deeply puzzled by how gravity got from A to B, leaving it as a challenge for future science with these words.

Einstein saw the challenge as a mathematical opportunity a few centuries later. He built an entire gravity theory on the idea that gravity is restricted by the speed of light, that gravity takes time to get from A to B.

This brings us to a hesitant phone call another hundred years later and the subsequent email from a Professor Quinney in 2023.  Professor Quinney being the head of an Australian university physics department. After a meeting the professor wrote: If you think the world has been wrong since Newton, and you have the one true theory of gravity, then publishing is what you are encourage to do. At the time, the recipient of the email didn’t claim to have a grand theory of gravity He simply knew—since achieving near-perfect high school physics marks decades ago—that Newton made a fatal mistake multiplying masses, and that governments shouldn't teach mistakes to their adolescents. He had figured out the tides for himself over thirty years previously  using subtraction and Newton's Third Law, but nobody in the academic world took it seriously during that period. Spurred by global conflicts in 2022, he decided to try harder to set the academic world straight about its tides. These mulled over words might help towards that end.

Except for his mass multiplication, Sir Isaac was actually closer to the truth with his "instantaneous" gravity requirement than Einstein was with his time delay. Why? Because gravity does not take time to get from Point A to Point B.

Gravity is the path from A to B. Along the path the direction of fall physically changes—in the space between mass  A and mass B, and also directly across the internal centers of mass A and mass B. 

As Ingrid from Norway suggested earlier, the nature of this path is particulate size reduction to do with the force of mass against space. The base cause of the acceleration being the reduction. Newton definitely has the force towards mass. Einstein did have mass warping what he was calling space time. Which also suggests a force away from mass. At that level Einstein may have been closer to the truth than Newton. 

This finite, space structured view of a gravity field only makes sense if the universe itself is the physical calculation of a never-ending number. Specifically, Pi: the inexact, but finite, never ending ratio of a circumference to a diameter.

As our the quintessential American academic voice  pointed out in the introduction, both "zero space" and "infinite space" are geometric impossibilities. Therefore, something, rather than nothing, must exist. There is no need for a Big Bang or a Supreme Creator to begin the universe; mandatory geometric existence says the three dimensions are always a myriad of particles. The buzzing periodic table of elements that is the universe we see now maybe a surprise consequence of the fact of the dual impossibilities of both an absence of space and infinite. But length, with and breadth cannot be nothing. We may or may not possess a soul that is generated by and survives biology, but a universe itself exists as a simple fact of length, width and breadth.

Which brings us back to the mine, and Einstein's ultimate mathematical failure. When faced with the center of a mass, Einstein's and his followers cook the books. They reduce length, width, and breadth to geometric singularities—zero-dimensional points of infinite gravity. Such is geometrically sickening to a normal thinker. Down here in under the surface of the earth we know the inverse square law is breaking down. the thing to add is that the weight of the world is what holds it upon its weightless core.

If Einstein’s math is useful for navigating space probes, well and good. But as a philosophy of geometry and reality, it's time to leave the book cookers in an asylum for the clinically insane. That is being said with a smile to the world..

So here we are in South Africa 4 kilometers under the surface of the earth in a deep one. And the Vatican is seeming urgent. About making a start on moving sun planetary motion. So we better see if we can  tidy up what's left of Newton's tidal mistake.  Being down here is a good place to consider the center of the earth and what is on the other side of the center. In these underground mines what is measured is what should mathematically be measured. A decrease in the rate of fall towards the center of the earth. Mathematically and physically the core of the earth should be weightless. Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton deal with this in different ways. With Einstein,  If the correct way of understanding the tides of the earth is through moonshot arithmetic and Newton's third law, Einstein has definitely  barked up the wrong tree about gravity.  Going back to Newton, Sir Isaac  had instantaneous gravity. How that could be so completely puzzled Newton and caused him to put these challenging words out into the realm of future science.

So then Einstein came along and began his theory with the notion of the sun's gravity taking 8 minutes to get to the earth. Then we have an email from a Professor Quinney, the head of an Australian university physics department to an old Australian man saying  if you think the world has been  wrong since Newton and you have the one true theory of gravity, then publishing is what you should do. Now, at the time,  the old Australian man didn't really think he had a theory of gravity. He was just saying Newton made a mistake when he multiplied masses together and the Australian government shouldn't be teaching mistakes to adolescents. .  And you understand the tides through moonshot arithmetic in the first instance and then Newton's third law in the second instance. Before his life unfolded the way it did, the Australian government had been giving him near perfect marks in physics exams back at school. A few marks knocked off for leaving units off was about all. But he left school knowing that the grade the government was saying he was good for carried some conceptual mistakes when it came to the physics of Sir Isaac Newton. Now it  was well over thirty years since he had worked out the tides for him self through moon shot arithmetic and Newton's third law. And no one ever looked like taking him seriously when he said as much to family, friends  or the academic world. But in 2022 there was something about Ukraine that was making him say to himself I have to try harder. That culminated in the email from Professor Quinney in 2023.The old Australian man had no beef with Albert Einstein born from school days.  If Einstein had lived a life deficient of a true understanding of the tides, there was going to be an issue there somewhere, though. The best way of addressing this  issue now may be stating it like this.  Except for his multiplication of masses, Sir Isaac was closer to the truth of gravity with his instantaneous requirement than Einstein was with his need for gravity to be universally time restricted. Crystallizing the theory of gravity that the old Australian man has through that statement, gravity is not going to take time to get from A to B as Einstein proposed. Gravity is the path from A to B and the path changes direction, in terms of direction of fall, in between A and B and also across the centers of A and B.  A and B being adjacent or nigh adjacent masses. Ingrid from Norway put this diagram up to give a bit of a rudimentary idea of the nature of the path of gravity. The green arrows are force arrows. If they are real, current schoolbooks have the force of gravity pointing the wrong way. The force of mass is against particulate space and the acceleration is through particulate sizes related to distance from the center of the field. space towards mass.  This  only makes sense if the universe its self is the calculation of a never ending number. Which is, almost obviously,  Pi. The inexact, never ending and finite  ratio of circumference to a diameter. Our biology may generate a soul that survives our bodies, but part of the gravity path theory is there is no need for the universe to have a supreme creator or a bang as it maker. As the quintessential American academic  pointed out at the beginning of this video, both an absence of space and infinite space are geometric impossibilities. If that is a good sound logic, something exists without any need of a god to make that something up. That something developing into a buzzing periodic table of elements may be a bit of a surprise but something, not nothing, must exist  Anyway, as we edge a little further into this gravity is simply the nature of space theory,  the underground evidence is the earth's  inverse square law or gravity field breaks down under its surface as the beginning of the descent reversal on the other side of the center of the earth.. The Einstein approach to this is geometrically sickening in terms of an unreasoned reduction of length, width and breadth to not existing at all and is best, in the main  socially and academically forgotten. If there is useful procedures that help with space ventures well and good  but Einstein himself and his subsequent followers are book cookers when they confront things that contradict  time being a dimension akin to length, width and breadth and a few other things.  Let's see what is being said over at Tonga about the second high tide not being exactly equal to the moon close high tide

[pause]Hello[thoughtful] Well Iran wants to be part of the educational move.[pause] The one to understanding the second high tide through this planets equal and opposite forces meeting way down below all our feet. [pause]On this account the Ayatollah said I can wear [whispers]whatever I like. [chuckles] And the Ayatollah is indeed happy with the men of Teheran. [pause]Their endeavors to see through the center of the earth to Pitcairn Island in the Pacific Ocean are just extraordinary. [pause][whispers]And, of course, their acceptance of the equal and opposite forces down at our planetary core are second to none. [long pause] [thoughtful]Now as the Vatican spokeswoman suggests, the home of algebra is assessing centripetal force as another misnomer of Sir Isaac Newton. [pause]The diagram you now see is an analysis of the [thoughtful]basic forces of a spinning wheel. [pause]Every particle in a spinning wheel is subject to an instantaneous equal and opposite force system with a catch. [pause]As you see, the forces are not exactly aligned as opposites. [pause] [whispers]That is the catch. [pause]The result being a constant third force away from the center of a spinning wheel. [pause]As the wheel turns, [thoughtful]each particle applies a force to the next and so on around the circle. [pause] The nigh equal and opposite force system goes around the wheel in the same direction as the rotation. [pause] This creates the measurable third force away from the center of the wheel as the wheel turns. [pause]The one we refer to as centrifugal force. [pause]That is the theory. [long pause]Remember Newton's inward pushing centripetal force has also only ever been a theory. [pause]It has never been measured by a measuring device.[pause]So which theory would be right.[pause] Could Sir Isaac have been wrong once again. [pause] What the Vatican spokeswoman was getting at is Sir Isaac's theoretical centripetal force is part of his explanation of the earth and other planets being able to orbit a fixed in space sun that is not fixed in space at all. [pause]With a turning wheel, Sir Isaac's theory was the inward force is born from a resistance force inside mass compelling mass to constant straight line motion. [pause]That resistance force of compulsion  inside mass is the real [whispers]made up force.[pause] I love Iran and the gaze of our men at the center of the earth. [pause]But we must go back to Greece and tune into a time over 2000 years ago. [pause]Was it slaves pushing rocks that had Aristotle thinking that force is required for motion to exist at all. [pause]Non aligned equal and opposite forces equals the third force we call centrifugal force is the theory of a spinning wheel from down town Teheran. [pause][cheerful]Shopping to do. [pause]And, of course, cars to drive and the world to [whispers]hug..[long pause] edit off.

Well Iran wants to be part of the educational move. The one to understanding the second high tide through this planets  equal and opposite forces meeting way down below all our feet. So the ayatollah said I can wear whatever I like from now on. And the Ayatollah is indeed happy with the men of Teheran. Their endeavors to see through the center of the earth to Pitcairn Island in the Pacific Ocean are extraordinary. And, of course, their acceptance of the equal and opposite forces down at  our planetary core are second to none.  Look at them. Well, yes, as the Vatican spokeswoman suggests, Iran is assessing centripetal force as another  misnomer of Sir Isaac Newton. The  diagram you now see is an analysis of the  basic forces of a spinning wheel. Every particle in a spinning wheel is subject to an instantaneous equal and opposite force system with a catch. As you see, the forces  are not exactly aligned as  opposites. The result  being a constant third  force away from the center of a spinning wheel. As the wheel turns, each particle applies a force to the next in line around the circle so as the internal force goes around the wheel in the same direction as the rotation. Just theory. Remember Newton's inward pushing centripetal force has also only ever been a theory.  The outward, not inward, force of a spinning is the only measurable one. Which theory would be right. Could Sir Isaac have been wrong.  Again.   What the Vatican spokeswoman was getting at is Sir Isaac's theoretical centripetal force is part of his fixed sun gravity field explanation of the earth and other planets being able to orbit a fixed sun. With a turning wheel, Sir Isaac's theory was the inward force is born from a force inside mass compelling mass to constant straight line motion. That force inside mass is the real made up force. I love Iran and our men worshipping the center of the earth. But we must go back to Greece and tune into well over 2000 years ago. Was  it slaves pushing rocks that had Aristotle thinking that force is required for motion to exist at all. Non aligned equal and opposite forces equals the third force we call centrifugal force is the theory of a spinning wheel from down town Teheran. Shopping to do. And, of course, cars to drive.

[pause]The diagram you now see is an analysis of the [thoughtful]basic forces of a spinning wheel. [pause]Every particle in a spinning wheel is subject to an instantaneous equal and opposite force system with a catch. [pause]As you see, the forces are not exactly aligned as opposites. The result being a constant third force away from the center of a spinning wheel. [pause]As the wheel turns, [thoughtful]each particle applies a force to the next in line around the circle. [pause] The nigh equal and opposite force system goes around the wheel in the same direction as the rotation. [pause] This creates the measurable third force away from the center of the wheel as the wheel turns. [pause]That is the theory. [long pause]Remember Newton's inward pushing centripetal force has also only ever been a theory of centrifugal force. [pause]The [strong emphasis]outward, not [whispers]inward, force of a spinning wheel is the only measurable one. [pause]So which theory would be right.[pause] Could Sir Isaac have been wrong. [pause]Again. [short pause] What the Vatican spokeswoman was getting at is Sir Isaac's theoretical centripetal force is part of his explanation of the earth and other planets being able to orbit a fixed in space sun that is not fixed in space at all. [pause]With a turning wheel, Sir Isaac's theory was the inward force is born from a force inside mass compelling mass to constant straight line motion. [pause]That force of compulsion  inside mass is the real [whispers]made up force.[pause] I love Iran and the gaze of our men at the center of the earth. [pause]But we must go back to Greece and tune into a time over 2000 years ago. [pause]Was it slaves pushing rocks that had Aristotle thinking that force is required for motion to exist at all. [pause]Non aligned equal and opposite forces equals the third force we call centrifugal force is the theory of a spinning wheel from down town Teheran. [pause][cheerful]Shopping to do. [pause]And, of course, cars to drive and the world to [whispers]hug..[long pause] edit off.

These are taken as an equal and opposite force pair. This almost gets into the area of Newton's opposite directions of fall not being able to mathematically coexist in space. Categorically equal and opposite forces cannot coexist side by side in a turning wheel or anywhere else. Whether or not center fleeing force is the most appropriate descriptor, it is force we can measure. Swing a bucket of water around in a circle and the water becomes weighted against the bottom of the bucket. So where does this force come from. At the start of this journey we saw the symbolic  broken chair and yes we do unhealthily have both land and sea mines in Iran. Current school teachers may say the chair forces down on the ground and the ground forces back up onto the chair. The latter part of this is not true. Ground can not push up, well not unless an earthquake or something like that is taking place underneath. No the upward force that supports the chair is the downward force of the other side of the earth. The ground the chair is on cannot be weighted in two directions at once. A school teacher saying the ground pushes a weight  up to support the chair is inventing a force for convenient explanation to a class. That is a preamble to saying centrifugal force is a consequence imprecise equal and opposite forces that circular motion naturally generates. The result is a singular force directed away from the center of the turning body.   Using gravity as a lead in tool to show what I believe is going on within a turning wheel, you can see a force beginning to move around a circular path. The force is born when the first ball strikes and finished when the balls eventually become stationary through the reverse swing and the friction of the pivot. The semblance of the opposite force is the back swing. Which is not a spontaneous opposite force. If the balls are taken to be particles of a turning wheel. The 

As you may or may not know, a papal decree is take effect. It is of a higher order than either a papal bull or an encyclical. It pertains to the truth of the earth's relationship with the rest of the universe. Radio telescope astronomers last century affirmed William Herschel's 1783 reckoning about the sun's gravity field being in motion. [pause]Today that gravity field is known to have a rate of speed superior to that of the planets relative to the sun. [thoughtful] With modern astronomers being certain of the fixed sun mistake of the [emphasis]Copernican revolution and of that superior motion of the sun relative to the planets, all fixed sun and fixed gravity field interpretations of planetary motion, in particular interpretations of Johannes Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, are to be checked for truth in all Catholic schools and teachings.[long pause] So that's it. The holy father is insisting on truth being taught in all Catholic schools

Thankyou madam,  Catholic schools have been teaching fixed in space gravity fields for several centuries now. Has the holy father lost his mind.

[clears throat] Hello. You most likely have heard that there is an Apostolic constitution coming.[pause] I will now read it out. [long pause][deep breath] [emphasis]Radio telescope astronomers last century affirmed William Herschel's 1783 discernment about the sun's gravity field being in motion. [pause]Today that gravity field is known to have a rate of speed superior to that of the planets relative to the sun. [thoughtful] With modern astronomers being certain of the fixed sun mistake of the [emphasis]Copernican revolution and of that superior motion of the sun relative to the planets, all fixed sun and fixed gravity field interpretations of planetary motion, in particular interpretations of Johannes Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, are to be checked for truth in all Catholic schools and teachings.[long pause] So that's it. The holy father is insisting on truth being taught in all Catholic schools.[pause]

Thankyou madam,  Catholic schools have been teaching fixed in space gravity fields for several centuries now. Has the holy father lost his mind.

Quite the contrary. The holy father was always troubled by the attributing of a linear or straight line velocity to the earth and other planets to explain their ongoing suspensions above a fixed sun. Teachers and Physicists had been happily assuring the holy father that a planet would have linear velocity if the sun did not have any gravity. The holy father will be leaving it to school teachers and professors to make the correction. The sun always has its gravity. Any teachings dependent on a consideration of the sun not having its gravity will be in conflict with this latest Apostolic constitution..  If you are interested, On the holy father's analysis, all descents are curved paths through space and there in lies the true  clue to planetary motion.

Madam is the holy father saying that when Sir Isaac Newton saw an apple fall in the earth's gravity field  it was following a curved path through space in its descent from branch to English soil. Wow.

That's right. Once again, it's for school teachers and professor to sort out. With respect of that apple,  it did follow a curved path. The unknown  is whether or not the  lost or gained  momentum relative to the earth as it fell. If England was on the front of our rotating earth at the time of the apple's descent. the apple would have actually lost momentum as it fell. Then regained that lost momentum upon impact with English soil. For planetary motion, when the earth is behind the sun, it is gaining momentum. When the earth passes the sun it begins to lose that gained momentum in a pendulumlike manner.  Ingrid from Norway  has said as much. The Holy Father observed that Ingrid introduced  a two dimensional earth year. Not a three dimensional one. Never the less the holy father was indeed pleased with Norwegian womanhood. 

The holy father says it will only be at least a year before professional school teachers and professors accept the motion of the sun's gravity field as the reason the earth and us are suspended up here way above the sun. In the meantime, a pertinent so far unknown logic of the nature of the outward force generated by a turning body has become available in birth place of algebra. In fact Teheran may be able to help with the class room move away from fixed gravity field to moving gravity fields. Thank you for your attendance. They holy father wishes you and everybody peace and goodwill. Enjoy the Italian sun, moving as it is..

The Pope's Easter message to the world is this. Galileo was wrong. The sun is not  fixed in the center of the universe. The modern radio telescope has now assessed that, beyond any, doubt, the sun and its gravity field are travelling at speed superior to that of planets relative to sun around a galaxy;. That galactic speed of the whole solar system  is a biggest astronomical  breakthrough that planet earth has nan aged so far. The Pope is asking school teachers to fix Galileo's fixed sun mistake up. The pope says the physics of orbital motion that is taught currently has as it foundation where a planet, moon or satellite would go if the the central body would go if the gravity of that central body was non existence. As you can see on this daigram, if the earth was to follow the Galilean path, it would be ascending in the sun's gravity field. Moving away from the sun Tracing back to at least Aristotle in the B.C. period, through circumstance and power of scholastic personality, considered scholars have been known to make convincing arguments.  Lesser scholars fall under the spell of these arguments. The lesser scholars then teach the argument that has conviced them  as the truth to the next generation and so a logic based on the absence of something that is always ther becomes  ingrained in the intellect of the world. Sir Isaac easily married Galileo's ill founded idea into his  mass multiplication mistake . This happened when Sir Isaac decided that mass multiplication explained the elliptical orbits that the German , Johannes Kepler had discerned that contradicted the necessary circullar planetary motion of Galileo's idea of why the eartrhbwas not falling into the sun. Part of this was an equating of gravity that was allowing the planets to ascend with a force called a centripetal force. For discusion on why cntripetal force is another  misnomer of history, the Pope wishes us to go to Iran where a representaive of the Ayatollah will speak on the unaligned equal and opposite forces of a spinning wheel. At the moment the pope is taking on the onerouse task of deciding whether or not water can be turned into wine for the drunks. 

[clears throat] Hello. [long pause] So, if you are wondering, we are a cohort of models from around the world. (...)[long pause]Yes. [thoughtful] At first we were skeptical of the flagrant approach. [pause]We had been asked to appear in a video. [pause]By an old Australian man waving money around. [chuckles] All he said was he wasn't a video performer. [pause]Just needed some  [whispers]illustrious performers to make one. [pause]Pertaining to teaching the tides and planetary motion at secondary school. [long pause][seductive]He added day lengths of the planets.[happy] After it was all explained to us, we could only agree to do the request and [whispers]free of charge. [seductive]If we do make mistakes, we apologize. [pause]Our first intention is  explaining the second high tide through Newton's third law and not his law of mass multiplications. [pause] [long pause]​​(...)So, getting on with the chore, in basic mathematics, the order of importance of operations is considered to be this: [seductive]Addition first, then [seductive] subtraction, followed by multiplication, and lastly, division. [pause]The simple inverse square law terminations way of explaining the high tide under the moon  that we have been [whispers]demonstrating  has subtraction in space at its base. [pause]The current belief of the moon actually weighting or pulling the ocean towards the moon a little bit endeavors to explain this high tide through the lower ranked mathematical operation of [whispers]multiplication. [thoughtful] So the profession of mathematics [whispers]would naturally prefer the explanation employing the  higher order operation. [long pause]Beyond that, [whispers]the kicker is terminations says that not anything, including multiplication, propagates an inverse square law through all space. [pause]Where you are seeing the large [whispers]letter X on this diagram again, it says there is a zero rate of fall calculated towards the Earth. [pause]A mathematician  knows that the multiplication [whispers]operation itself is defunct when zero is part of the operation.[pause] What this means is the subtraction method of explaining the high tide under the moon says gravity is always a finitely limited spatial extension from a [whispers]source particle.[pause][seductive] No particular inverse square law, or any inverse square law at all, is able to multiply its way through all space to all other masses as Mister Newton proposed to the mathematicians of his day.[long pause] If that is being basically understood, the word is the Vatican may have  some breaking [seductive]news. [pause]To be said here or anywhere before we go.[pause] Russia may have a wish to continue with what [whispers]Mister Gorbachev inadvertently started a few decades ago, to disintegrate this relatively huge east to west land mass into smaller[whispers] autonomous parts.[seductive] Then we would need those super technology wizards from [whispers]Ukraine to come in and dismantle all our unneeded nuclear  weapons.[pause] Ukraine does have a lot on their plate, though. [pause]Fortunately their nation is shaping as being true humanity.[pause][wistful] So we can only hope.[sad] (...)[pause][sad][sigh]Down deep our current Russian leader knows he is a unfortunate relic of an unenlightened god fearing past.[pause]Any new states North East or south of Moscow would hopefully work hard to establish democratic constitutions, that is if separated autonomies come to be. [long pause][seductive][whispers]Even constitutions  better than what [challenges][whispers]Norway has. [smile]

2

Thank you ladies Gentleman. Now many of you believe that Sir Isaac Newton came up with mass multiplkication by equating the centripetal acceleration of a planet or a moon towards a center of gravity with centipretal acceleration. There are several things about this. Firstly the news coming out of Iran is centripetal acceleration does not exist. Only centrifugal acceleration does.

Click here to start customizing

[clears throat] Hello. You most likely have heard that there is an Apostolic constitution coming.[pause] I will now read it out. [long pause][deep breath] [emphasis]Radio telescope astronomers last century affirmed William Herschel's 1783 discernment about the sun's gravity field being in motion. [pause]Today that gravity field is known to have a rate of speed superior to that of the planets relative to the sun. [thoughtful] With modern astronomers being certain of the fixed sun mistake of the [emphasis]Copernican revolution and of that superior motion of the sun relative to the planets, all fixed sun and fixed gravity field interpretations of planetary motion, in particular interpretations of Johannes Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, are to be checked for truth in all Catholic schools and teachings.[long pause] So that's it. The holy father is insisting on truth being taught in all Catholic schools.[pause]

Thankyou madam,  Catholic schools have been teaching fixed in space gravity fields for several centuries now. Has the holy father lost his mind.

Quite the contrary. The holy father was always troubled by the attributing of a linear or straight line velocity to the earth and other planets to explain their ongoing suspensions above a fixed sun. Teachers and Physicists had been happily assuring the holy father that a planet would have linear velocity if the sun did not have any gravity. The holy father will be leaving it to school teachers and professors to make the correction. The sun always has its gravity. Any teachings dependent on a consideration of the sun not having its gravity will be in conflict with this latest Apostolic constitution..  If you are interested, On the holy father's analysis, all descents are curved paths through space and there in lies the true  clue to planetary motion.

Madam is the holy father saying that when Sir Isaac Newton saw an apple fall in the earth's gravity field  it was following a curved path through space in its descent from branch to English soil. Wow.

That's right. Once again, it's for school teachers and professor to sort out. With respect of that apple,  it did follow a curved path. The unknown  is whether or not the  lost or gained  momentum relative to the earth as it fell. If England was on the front of our rotating earth at the time of the apple's descent. the apple would have actually lost momentum as it fell. Then regained that lost momentum upon impact with English soil. For planetary motion, when the earth is behind the sun, it is gaining momentum. When the earth passes the sun it begins to lose that gained momentum in a pendulumlike manner.  Ingrid from Norway  has said as much. The Holy Father observed that Ingrid introduced  a two dimensional earth year. Not a three dimensional one. Never the less the holy father was indeed pleased with Norwegian womanhood. 

The holy father says it will only be at least a year before professional school teachers and professors accept the motion of the sun's gravity field as the reason the earth and us are suspended up here way above the sun. In the meantime, a pertinent so far unknown logic of the nature of the outward force generated by a turning body has become available in birth place of algebra. In fact Teheran may be able to help with the class room move away from fixed gravity field to moving gravity fields. Thank you for your attendance. They holy father wishes you and everybody peace and goodwill. Enjoy the Italian sun, moving as it is..

The Pope's Easter message to the world is this. Galileo was wrong. The sun is not  fixed in the center of the universe. The modern radio telescope has now assessed that, beyond any, doubt, the sun and its gravity field are travelling at speed superior to that of planets relative to sun around a galaxy;. That galactic speed of the whole solar system  is a biggest astronomical  breakthrough that planet earth has nan aged so far. The Pope is asking school teachers to fix Galileo's fixed sun mistake up. The pope says the physics of orbital motion that is taught currently has as it foundation where a planet, moon or satellite would go if the the central body would go if the gravity of that central body was non existence. As you can see on this daigram, if the earth was to follow the Galilean path, it would be ascending in the sun's gravity field. Moving away from the sun Tracing back to at least Aristotle in the B.C. period, through circumstance and power of scholastic personality, considered scholars have been known to make convincing arguments.  Lesser scholars fall under the spell of these arguments. The lesser scholars then teach the argument that has conviced them  as the truth to the next generation and so a logic based on the absence of something that is always ther becomes  ingrained in the intellect of the world. Sir Isaac easily married Galileo's ill founded idea into his  mass multiplication mistake . This happened when Sir Isaac decided that mass multiplication explained the elliptical orbits that the German , Johannes Kepler had discerned that contradicted the necessary circullar planetary motion of Galileo's idea of why the eartrhbwas not falling into the sun. Part of this was an equating of gravity that was allowing the planets to ascend with a force called a centripetal force. For discusion on why cntripetal force is another  misnomer of history, the Pope wishes us to go to Iran where a representaive of the Ayatollah will speak on the unaligned equal and opposite forces of a spinning wheel. At the moment the pope is taking on the onerouse task of deciding whether or not water can be turned into wine for the drunks. 

[clears throat] Hello. [long pause] So, if you are wondering, we are a cohort of models from around the world. (...)[long pause]Yes. [thoughtful] At first we were skeptical of the flagrant approach. [pause]We had been asked to appear in a video. [pause]By an old Australian man waving money around. [chuckles] All he said was he wasn't a video performer. [pause]Just needed some  [whispers]illustrious performers to make one. [pause]Pertaining to teaching the tides and planetary motion at secondary school. [long pause][seductive]He added day lengths of the planets.[happy] After it was all explained to us, we could only agree to do the request and [whispers]free of charge. [seductive]If we do make mistakes, we apologize. [pause]Our first intention is  explaining the second high tide through Newton's third law and not his law of mass multiplications. [pause] [long pause]​​(...)So, getting on with the chore, in basic mathematics, the order of importance of operations is considered to be this: [seductive]Addition first, then [seductive] subtraction, followed by multiplication, and lastly, division. [pause]The simple inverse square law terminations way of explaining the high tide under the moon  that we have been [whispers]demonstrating  has subtraction in space at its base. [pause]The current belief of the moon actually weighting or pulling the ocean towards the moon a little bit endeavors to explain this high tide through the lower ranked mathematical operation of [whispers]multiplication. [thoughtful] So the profession of mathematics [whispers]would naturally prefer the explanation employing the  higher order operation. [long pause]Beyond that, [whispers]the kicker is terminations says that not anything, including multiplication, propagates an inverse square law through all space. [pause]Where you are seeing the large [whispers]letter X on this diagram again, it says there is a zero rate of fall calculated towards the Earth. [pause]A mathematician  knows that the multiplication [whispers]operation itself is defunct when zero is part of the operation.[pause] What this means is the subtraction method of explaining the high tide under the moon says gravity is always a finitely limited spatial extension from a [whispers]source particle.[pause][seductive] No particular inverse square law, or any inverse square law at all, is able to multiply its way through all space to all other masses as Mister Newton proposed to the mathematicians of his day.[long pause] If that is being basically understood, the word is the Vatican may have  some breaking [seductive]news. [pause]To be said here or anywhere before we go.[pause] Russia may have a wish to continue with what [whispers]Mister Gorbachev inadvertently started a few decades ago, to disintegrate this relatively huge east to west land mass into smaller[whispers] autonomous parts.[seductive] Then we would need those super technology wizards from [whispers]Ukraine to come in and dismantle all our unneeded nuclear  weapons.[pause] Ukraine does have a lot on their plate, though. [pause]Fortunately their nation is shaping as being true humanity.[pause][wistful] So we can only hope.[sad] (...)[pause][sad][sigh]Down deep our current Russian leader knows he is a unfortunate relic of an unenlightened god fearing past.[pause]Any new states North East or south of Moscow would hopefully work hard to establish democratic constitutions, that is if separated autonomies come to be. [long pause][seductive][whispers]Even constitutions  better than what [challenges][whispers]Norway has. [smile]

2

Thank you ladies Gentleman. Now many of you believe that Sir Isaac Newton came up with mass multiplkication by equating the centripetal acceleration of a planet or a moon towards a center of gravity with centipretal acceleration. There are several things about this. Firstly the news coming out of Iran is centripetal acceleration does not exist. Only centrifugal acceleration does.