WHY VENUS TURNS BACKWARDS

Looks like we as a solar system have worked out the reason of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))It's Newton's third law and the size of space.((⏱️=1000))More about that after we get through the mess that Sir Isaac himself left behind.((⏱️=1000))During his life he has been aware of a true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000))Unfortunately, in a confused state of mind, he has turned this truth into a lie.((⏱️=1000))Every particle in the universe is not by any measure attracting every other particle in the universe.((⏱️=1000))This planet may be too far gone to sort Sir Isaac's blunder about the universe out.((⏱️=500))Let's find out.

As awake as I will ever be. ((⏱️=1000)) And apologies for skipping over what you just explained.((⏱️=1000))That was quite remiss of me.((⏱️=1000)) An elephant would not even do that. ((⏱️=1000))With hope of the apology being accepted, anyone can see the situation as it is. ((⏱️=1000)) It's three hundred years after the life and times of Sir Isaac Newton and his admission of not knowing how gravity does its thing. ((⏱️=1000))The physics to support a drawing force being the result of the multiplication of the earth and an apple together has not arrived. ((⏱️=1000)) Want did arrive was the small minded idea of the earth and moon orbiting around a joint center of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This was taken as further proof of a multiplication of two masses being a joining force between those two masses. ((⏱️=1000))It is only an observation of the earth or the earth moon system varying its distance from the sun as the moon passes from the back to the front of the earth.((⏱️=1000))Of course you do not know that the earth has a front a back as yet. ((⏱️=1000)) But all gravity fields have a front and back. ((⏱️=1000))This because they are in motion. ((⏱️=1000))Unbeknownst to Sir Isaac and all of us at this stage, Sir Isaac's apple may have lost speed as it fell.((⏱️=1000))An apple falling against the earth's gravity field's direction of travel loses momentum as it falls. ((⏱️=1000))An apple falling in the same direction as the direction of travel of the earth's gravity field gains momentum as it falls. ((⏱️=1000))This does not directly explain away the small mindedness of joint centers of gravity.((⏱️=1000))But it is simple relativity and it is a beginning towards that end. ((⏱️=1000))We better get to Cavendish experiments.
At the very least, that so far absent physics would need to show its face and manage itself into intellectual life before it could joint centers of gravities could be said to exist. ((⏱️=1000))If this diagram here is the mathematical truth of the earth, moon and sun gravity fields, then the explanation of what you call Barry centers will, in all probability, be associated with the 14 day rhythm of the earth and moon alternatively passing each other as the solar system advances around the galaxy. ((⏱️=1000)) As Rachel alluded to, gravity is not simply mathematics everywhere.((⏱️=1000))Gravity fields are finite physical particles inside physical particles like smaller balloons inside a bigger balloon with the interior balloons all moving sinusoidally in the direction of the biggest local gravity field.((⏱️=3000)) If this finite gravity field diagram were to be wrong in some way or other, the multiplication of the earth by an apple to explain the force of Newton's law of gravity would still not be right. ((⏱️=1000)) If the diagram is the size truth of the earth and moon gravity fields, joint centers of gravity are not a mathematical possibility.

As awake as I will ever be. ((⏱️=1000)) And apologies for skipping over what you just explained.((⏱️=1000))That was quite remiss of me.((⏱️=1000)) Even an elephant would not do that. ((⏱️=1000))With hope of the apology being accepted, anyone can see the situation as it is. ((⏱️=1000)) It's three hundred years after the life and times of Sir Isaac Newton and his admission of not knowing how gravity does its thing of getting from one mass to another. ((⏱️=1000))The physics to support a drawing force being the result of the multiplication of the earth and an apple together has not arrived. ((⏱️=1000)) What has arrived is the fixed reference frame idea of the earth and moon orbiting around a joint center of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))There is an observation that is construable as such.((⏱️=1000)) You can see that observation on this fixed reference frame animation. ((⏱️=1000))The observation was taken as further or the needed proof of a multiplication of two masses together being a joining force between those two masses. ((⏱️=1000))Plus, as it would be, that multiplication being the creator of a joint center of gravity somewhere in between any two masses of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))Proof of multiplication being able to perform these magic feats is what you might call your pretend science. ((⏱️=1000))In reality, this animation is only an observation of the earth or the earth moon system varying its distance from the sun as the moon passes from the back to the front of the earth.((⏱️=1000))Since the days of Galileo if not before, celestial science has had the problem of fixing gravity fields in space to understand the universe. ((⏱️=1000))This maybe useful for mapping and predicting return events. ((⏱️=1000))If the goal is to understand the universe through gravity, fixed reference frames are only a debilitating obstruction. ((⏱️=1000)) Because of fixed reference frames, what you are not learning for your selves is all gravity fields have a front and a back. ((⏱️=1000))This is because of their motion. ((⏱️=1000))Unbeknownst to Sir Isaac, his apple may have lost momentum as it fell.((⏱️=1000))An apple falling against the earth's gravity field direction of travel loses momentum as it falls. ((⏱️=1000))Conversely an apple falling in the same direction as the direction of travel of the earth's gravity field is a momentum gainer. ((⏱️=1000))Notice how the apple on the front side of the earth is travelling slower than the earth while it falls. ((⏱️=1000))Or, on the Copernican revolution number of the earth travelling at 30 km/sec, the earth travels about 15 kilometers while the apple descends a meter from branch to ground. ((⏱️=1000)) Explaining this with a touch of graphicness, when I lift my tail for business reasons, on the Copernican number, the earth has travelled about 30 kilometers through space by the time my business hits the savannah below. ((⏱️=1000))The point being the main journey of my falling business is many fold greater than my leg length that fixed reference frame science has said it would be. ((⏱️=1000))This does not directly explain away fixed reference frame joint centers of gravity.((⏱️=1000))But it is simple relativity and it is a beginning towards doing that and also a beginning towards understanding planetary motion through post Galilean physics that do not require gravity to be intermittent. ((⏱️=1000))We better get to Cavendish experiments.((⏱️=1000))On the other hand, if that zebbrah crosses by again, she will probably rebuke my thoroughness or lack there of.((⏱️=1000))So perhaps we best first have a little more of a look at the earth and the moon and their cycle. ((⏱️=1000))What you need to learn is that descents in moving gravity fields have the makings of an absolute frame of reference.((⏱️=1000))As you begin to understand that, you have a better sense of relativity than your Albert Einstein and his thought experiments ever did.((⏱️=1000))Albert's problem was he was warned against questioning Newton and Galileo. ((⏱️=1000))If he wanted to make his mark in academia, he was instructed to add to the works of those fine European gentlemen. ((⏱️=1000))Which would be well and good if Galileo and Newton had not made a couple of consequential mistakes back in days of yon.((⏱️=1000))But blunders they managed and here we are on the savannah with or without flying pigs.

200 years later Albert Einstein made a suggestion of mass being a force applied to something he was calling space time. ((⏱️=1000))The point being the 200 year later Einstein advancement on Newton was suggesting that Newton has the force of gravity pointing the wrong way. ((⏱️=1500))It is now over 100 years since Einstein made that pointing the wrong way suggestion to you. ((⏱️=1000))Thus it would be getting to be an appropriate time for you to consider the physics of mass disturbing its surroundings to cause its gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))Albert's word's of physics were mass bends spacetime. ((⏱️=800))Nothing gets bent without the presence of force. ((⏱️=1500))Out here on the post Einstein savannah we have the force of mass being against the three dimensional nature of space, not space time and the equal and opposite force to this force being traceable to the mathematical end of the three dimensions..((⏱️=1000)) Best for you all to have a look at day length animations and the probability of gravity field turn rates being the arbiters of the day lengths of the planets before further considerations about space being naturally finite and the reason of a universe within.((⏱️=2000)) Herbert, are you awake? ((⏱️=1000))I am on my way to a crossing. ((⏱️=800))A zebrah crossing.

If the apple accelerates, Newton contends to himself it must be subject to one of his second law forces.((⏱️=1000)) As we will see directly, he does not know how such a force can be so. ((⏱️=1000))Next Sir Isaac considers the momentum change of his falling apple. ((⏱️=1000))As already mentioned, from his true law of gravity the acceleration rate of the apple is the mass of the earth divided by the square of the distance between the center of the earth and the apple. ((⏱️=1000))Which is large M divided by d squared on our simulation. ((⏱️=1000))When he multiplies this acceleration by the mass of the apple, his second law gives him the momentum change of his apple. ((⏱️=1000))He goes on to call this his law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac's problem of consequence is the momentum change of an apple is not a connecting force between the apple and the earth. ((⏱️=1000)) He skated right past this dilemma. ((⏱️=1000))We can only presume he was having a rush of blood.((⏱️=1000))He needed to eat the apple and entertain the universe some more before declaring momentum change to be universal gravitation.

Whether or not Newton's true law of gravity was Newton's original work may be historically debatable.((⏱️=1000)) It is what his untrue law of universal gravitation is built on. ((⏱️=1000))So he has definitely been aware of it. ((⏱️=1000))On the other hand, he only articulated an untrue law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1000))He did not write this true one down.((⏱️=1000))In Newton's error new science carried a great prestige.((⏱️=1000)) Great enough to echo into the future right up until today. ((⏱️=1000))With that sort of priority power at play, double dealing plagiarism was not unheard of((⏱️=1000)) Newton may have lifted his true law of gravity from a peer for all we know today. ((⏱️=1000))Another angle of consideration is this. ((⏱️=1000))If you were gravity orientated, it would not take a chance falling apple sighting to bring your focus to gravity. ((⏱️=1000))It is where your mind would be anyway. ((⏱️=1000))By the time he was telling the apple story, he had overwhelmed the academic world with pages and pages of mathematical advancement. ((⏱️=1000))On this account he was avoiding any skeptical discussions about an apple and the earth exerting an equal force on each other. ((⏱️=1000))Thus there is a reasonable chance he invented the apple story in his later life to hide the uncertainty he was carrying about his description of the tides and his law of universal gravitation((⏱️=1000))All this means there is a question mark about who first doodled down a rate of acceleration towards mass M is directly proportional to M and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of M that the acceleration is happening at. ((⏱️=2000))That true law in itself needs a little tidying up by now. ((⏱️=1000)) Today you know that the inverse square law breaks down beneath the surface of M.((⏱️=1000))Also the fact that the rate of acceleration increases during a descent means the universal constant is never exactly calculatable((⏱️=1000)) Now onto Newton's second law and the mayhem Newton has created in the minds of subsequent professors.

How gravity got from the earth to the apple or the apple to the earth, Sir Isaac did not know. ((⏱️=1000)) However he had arrived at his mutual gravitation formula, either wittingly or unwittingly, he was deciding the essence of gravity getting from one mass to another was several arithmetical operations. ((⏱️=1000))Those arithmetical operations being the division of the multiplication of the masses together by the square of the distance separating them. ((⏱️=1500))This played the role of shielding his dilemma about how gravity got from mass A to mass B from the unseen but simple problem that a multiplication of masses was creating. ((⏱️=1000))That hidden elementary dilemma being this. ((⏱️=1000)) If the drawing ability of matter was in proportion to its quantity as Sir Isaac was saying, multiplication is an unfixable disturbance of that considered proportion. ((⏱️=1500))Take 10 kilograms of mass. ((⏱️=1000))Divide it into portions and separate the portions. ((⏱️=1000)) One portion is 9 kilograms and the other is 1 kilogram. ((⏱️=1000))If Newton's formula is sensible, the two masses are drawn together by a force factor of nine. ((⏱️=1000))Next time split the 10 kilograms into portions of 6 and 4 kilograms. ((⏱️=1000))Under Newton's formula, the drawing power of that the 10 kilograms of mass is now able to produce has moved up to a factor of 24.((⏱️=1000)) How could that have ever been so?((⏱️=2000))More graphically, when men go to the moon, that is a transfer of mass from the earth to the moon. ((⏱️=1000))From a larger mass to a smaller mass. ((⏱️=1000))According to Newtonian gravity science, when men are on the moon, the mutual attraction between the earth and the moon has increased. ((⏱️=1000))If this was so, an explanation of how would be required for the formula to be ethically taught to your next generation.((⏱️=1000))It is bad form to teach things that are not <emphasis level="reduced">true to adolescents.</emphasis>

Next, during your process of calculating the gravity constant, you set Newton's second law equal to Newton's universal gravitation formula. ((⏱️=1000)) When you do this the smaller masses are procedurally cancelled out from one side of your equation to the other. ((⏱️=1000))All the presence of the smaller masses are doing is allowing for your measurement of the gravity strength of the larger masses. ((⏱️=1000))Nothing <emphasis level="reduced">more. </emphasis>((⏱️=1000)) The important point or understanding is the cancelling out of the smaller masses across the equation returns this three hundred year old ill considered law of universal gravitation to what it always was.((⏱️=1000)) That being Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000)) But now unencumbered by a quaint English story about the earth absurdly falling towards falling fruit. ((⏱️=1000))This point about the small masses being immaterial to any estimate of the constant of Newton's true law of gravity could do with<emphasis level="reduced"> good and proper recognition</emphasis>.((⏱️=1000)) It's important to setting current and future custodians of your Copernican revolution on the straight<emphasis level="reduced">and narrow</emphasis>.

I am not meaning to be rude but thank you. ((⏱️=800))You have moved a little too quickly past this typical universal gravitation diagram. ((⏱️=1000))To everyone else, I am Rachel the <emphasis level="strong">passing Zebera.</emphasis> ((⏱️=1000))F 1 and F 2 on the diagram are typically taken as Newton second law forces manifesting as an equal and opposite force pair of Newton's third law. ((⏱️=1000))What I have interrupted Herbert to say is this. ((⏱️=800))Forces are directional. ((⏱️=800))In contrast, mass is directionless. ((⏱️=1000))The only way equal and opposite force directions can be construed into the product of two masses divided by their distance of separation squared is by allowing the distance of separation between the masses to be directional((⏱️=1000)) or, as it would be in this situation, directed two ways with those several directions opposing each other. ((⏱️=1000))While in terms of gravity the D maybe directional, Sir Isaac is flagrantly disrespectful of the inverse of distance squared representing a direction of fall one way or the other. ((⏱️=2000))The D squared you see in this formula is the inverse square law of each individual mass moulded into one non descript inverse square law. ((⏱️=1000))This has caused a loss of direction for each.((⏱️=1000)) That is a problem of mathematical science that you have had since the inception of this diagram into your popular thinking.((⏱️=1000)) If that problem could be resolved, the magnitude of the inverse of d squared varies from M1 to M 2. ((⏱️=1000))This is because the inverse of D squared represents a rate of acceleration towards an individual mass. ((⏱️=1000))Not simply the distance between two masses squared. ((⏱️=800))Meaning that Newton's universal gravitation formula in totality is unable to cope with how the formula engineers the direction of his universal force into his formula and thus has always been a significantly senseless law of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))It is only when you use the large mass in isolation and disregard the small mass that it becomes a sensibly useful tool of said universe.((⏱️=1000)) It should be mentioned that this is not inconsistent with a force being involved with the acceleration of Sir Isaac's apple from branch to earth.((⏱️=2000))Before returning to Herbert, will you allow me to get a little historic with you.((⏱️=800)) If you will, it is to have a little deeper look into this matter of the direction of the force relevant to the the acceleration of Sir Isaac Newton's falling apple.((⏱️=3000)) it is 300 years since Newton announced universal gravitation with his stated caveat of don't ask me how force gets from the earth to the apple or the apple to the earth.

Now in this half of Newton's confusion between a momentum gain and a force joining two masses together, you will notice that large M and small m are in reversed positions. ((⏱️=500))This time the large Mass represents mass and the small mass represents the cause of the acceleration of the large mass((⏱️=1000))When Newton was considering the momentum gain of the apple, it was the other way around.((⏱️=1000))So, ((⏱️=1000))or whether or not a failing apple stem causes the earth to suddenly move towards an apple, in both cases all he was looking at was momentum change as described by his second law. ((⏱️=1000))He was not looking at a mutual force that joined the earth and the apple together for as long as each existed.((⏱️=1000))This was a bit of bad luck for all concerned.

I hereby announce universal gravitation to the world as the law of the universe. ((⏱️=800))If I am wrong, at least I tried((⏱️=800))Now the time has come to tell some apple stories ((⏱️=800))<emphasis level="reduced">Thank you for your considerations of my summation of the universe.</emphasis>((⏱️=1000))

Thank you. ((⏱️=800))To everyone else, I am Rachel the <emphasis level="strong">passing Zebera.</emphasis> ((⏱️=1000))Herbert you have moved too quickly past this typical universal gravitation diagram that you snared off their internet. ((⏱️=1000))F 1 and F 2 on the diagram are typically taken as Newton second law forces manifesting as an equal and opposite force pair of Newton's third law. ((⏱️=1000))What I have interrupted Herbert to say is this. ((⏱️=800))Forces are directional. ((⏱️=800))In contrast, mass is directionless. ((⏱️=1000))The only way equal and opposite force directions can be construed into the product of two masses divided by their distance of separation squared is by allowing the distance of separation between the masses to be directional((⏱️=1000)) or, as it would be in this situation, directed two ways with those several directions opposing each other. ((⏱️=1000))While in terms of gravity the D maybe directional, Sir Isaac is flagrantly disrespectful of the inverse of distance squared representing a direction of fall one way or the other. ((⏱️=2000))The D squared you see is the inverse square law of each individual mass moulded into one. ((⏱️=1000))This has caused a loss of direction for each.((⏱️=1000)) In Newton's universal gravitation d squared is absolutely directionless.((⏱️=1000)) So that is a problem of mathematical science that you have had since the inception of this diagram into your popular thinking.((⏱️=1000)) If that problem could be overcome, the magnitude of d squared varies from M1 to M 2. ((⏱️=1000))This is because D squared represents a rate of acceleration towards an individual mass. ((⏱️=1000))Not simply the distance between two masses squared. ((⏱️=800))Meaning that Newton's universal gravitation formula in totality is unable to cope with how the formula engineers the direction of his universal force into his formula and thus has always been a significantly senseless law of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))It is only when you use the large mass in isolation and disregard the small mass that it becomes a sensibly useful tool of said universe.((⏱️=1000)) It should be mentioned that this is not inconsistent with a force being involved with the acceleration of Sir Isaac's apple from branch to earth.((⏱️=2000))Before returning to Herbert, will you allow me to get a little historic with you.((⏱️=800)) If you will, it is to have a little deeper look into this matter of the direction of the force relevant to the the acceleration of Sir Isaac Newton's falling apple.((⏱️=1000)) it is 300 years since Newton announced universal gravitation with his stated caveat of don't ask me how force gets from the earth to the apple or the apple to the earth.

200 years later an Albert Einstein made a vague suggestion of mass being a force applied to something he was calling space time. ((⏱️=1000))The point being the 200 year later Einstein advancement on Newton was suggesting that Newton has the force of gravity pointing the wrong way. ((⏱️=1500))It is now over 100 years since Einstein made that pointing the wrong way suggestion to you. ((⏱️=1000))Thus it would be getting to be an appropriate time to move your reckonings about gravity on again. ((⏱️=1500))Out here on the post Einstein savannah we have the force of mass being against the three dimensional nature of space, not space time and the equal and opposite force to this force being traceable to the mathematical end of the three dimensions..((⏱️=1000)) Best for you all to have a look at day length animations and the probability of gravity field turn rates being the arbiters of the day lengths of the planets before further considerations about space being naturally finite and the reason of a universe within.((⏱️=1000)) Back to you Herbert.((⏱️=1000)) Sorry for the interruption and watch out for that pair of lions behind the grassy knoll.((⏱️=1000))They are snoozing at the moment.

Next, during your process of setting Newton's second law equal to Newton's universal gravitation formula to calculate the constant, the smaller masses are procedurally cancelled out from one side of your equation to the other. ((⏱️=1000))All the presence of the small masses are doing is allowing for the measurement of the gravity strength of the larger masses. ((⏱️=1000))Nothing <emphasis level="reduced">more. </emphasis>((⏱️=1000)) The cancelling out of the small masses across the equation returns this three hundred year old ill considered law of universal gravitation to what it always was.((⏱️=1000)) That being Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000)) But now unencumbered by a quaint English story about the earth absurdly falling towards an apple. ((⏱️=1000))At least <emphasis level="reduced">the dinosaurs seem happy.</emphasis>. ((⏱️=1000))And that's good.((⏱️=1000))They

Herbert could I interrupt for a few minutes. ((⏱️=1500))Thank you. ((⏱️=800))To everyone else, I am Rachel the <emphasis level="strong">passing Zebera.</emphasis> ((⏱️=1000))Herbert you have moved too quickly past this typical universal gravitation diagram that you snared off their internet. ((⏱️=1000))F 1 and F 2 on the diagram are typically taken as Newton second law forces manifesting as an equal and opposite force pair of Newton's third law. ((⏱️=1000))What I have interrupted Herbert to say is this. ((⏱️=800))Forces are directional. ((⏱️=800))In contrast, mass is directionless. ((⏱️=1000))The only way equal and opposite force directions can be construed into the product of two masses divided by their distance of separation squared is by allowing the distance of separation between the masses to be directional((⏱️=1000)) or, as it would be in this situation, directed two ways with those several directions opposing each other. ((⏱️=1000))While in terms of gravity the D maybe directional, Sir Isaac is flagrantly disrespectful of the inverse of distance squared being of that terms. ((⏱️=2000))The D squared you see is the inverse square law of each individual mass moulded into one. ((⏱️=1000))This has caused a loss of direction for each.((⏱️=1000)) In Newton's universal gravitation d squared is absolutely directionless.((⏱️=1000)) So that is a problem of mathematical science that you have had since the inception of this diagram into your popular thinking.((⏱️=1000)) If that problem could be overcome, the magnitude of d squared varies from M1 to M 2. ((⏱️=1000))This is because D squared represents a rate of acceleration towards an individual mass. ((⏱️=1000))Not simply the distance between two masses squared. ((⏱️=800))Meaning that Newton's universal gravitation formula in totality is unable to cope with how the formula engineers the direction of his universal force into his formula and thus has always been a significantly senseless law of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))It is only when you use the large mass in isolation and disregard the small mass that it becomes a sensibly useful tool of said universe.((⏱️=1000)) This is not denying that if what is called gravity causes an acceleration that there is not a force involved in some way or other. ((⏱️=4000))Before returning to Herbert, will you allow me to get a little historic with you.((⏱️=800)) If you will, it is 300 years since Newton announced universal gravitation with his stated caveat of don't ask me how force gets from the earth to the apple or the apple to the earth. ((⏱️=1000))200 years later an Albert Einstein made a vague suggestion of mass being a force applied to something he was calling space time. ((⏱️=1000))The point being the 200 year later Einstein advancement on Newton was suggesting that Newton has the force of gravity pointing the wrong way. ((⏱️=1500))It is now over 100 years since Einstein made that pointing the wrong way suggestion to you. ((⏱️=1000))Thus it would be getting to be an appropriate time to move your reckonings about gravity on again. ((⏱️=1500))Out here on the post Einstein savannah we have the force of mass being against space, not space time and the equal and opposite force to this force being traceable to the mathematical end of space.((⏱️=1000)) Best for you all to have a look at day length animations and the probability of gravity field turn rates being the arbiters of the day lengths of the planets before further considerations about space being naturally finite and the reason of a universe within.((⏱️=1000)) Back to you Herbert.((⏱️=1000)) Sorry for the interruption and watch out for that pair of lions behind the grassy knoll.((⏱️=1000))They are snoozing at the moment.

If you are a lady or gentleman relaxing in the idea of Newton's third law making Newton's universal gravitation formula the truth, steady on please. You are presuming the Newtonian forces are towards mass. You are not considering that the force is an action against what surrounds mass. Albert Einstein suggested this with his idea of mass causing a curvature in what surrounds mass. If Albert is a little bit on the right track, the opposite action is going to be traceable to the end of space. For now and without explanation of how so, you are relying on a multiplication of two masses divided by the square of their distance apart producing two forces that are oppositely directed towards separate masses. As you know, mass is a scalar quantity. Distance as in Newton's formula until it is split in half, is also a scalar quantity. How can the multiplication of three scalar quantities together produce a force or a vector quantity? You may need to be admitting to yourselves that Newton's universal formula was always an unfortunate overcooking of his true law of gravity. Then you can restart your thinking about the universe. That frsh start may include considering the force being

If you are one those rascals relaxing in the idea of Newton's third law making Newton's universal gravitation the truth, steady on please. Consider your self not right and consider your self not wrong. For the uninitiated, Newton's third law is the one that says to every force there is an equal and opposite force. Of course, if you are familiar with the semi diurnal tides of the earth, thanks to the moon, you are now in a position to cherish Newton's third law as the answer to those tides. Now what you have been scientifically referring to as gravity for the last five hundred years is an observable cause of acceleration towards the mass of the earth or an observable cause of weight if that acceleration is obstructed from further accelerating. Some three hundred Newton moved the situation to include every mass of the universe. But, as we are pointing out, overstepped the mark when he said therefore every mass in the universe is attracting every other mass in the universe.
If gravity causes acceleration or a potential to accelerate, gravity must be a force directed towards the centre of mass. This is going to be a long story to explain. Fortunately or unfortunately, it must touch on the most probable reason of the universe.
To begin, without anybody really recognizing as much, Albert Einstein began an idea of reversing the force that we call gravity to being away from mass. He did this when he began saying gravity is really mass causing a curvature in what he was calling space time. For this to be so, the force would be away from mass. For those not so familiar with how Albert began, it was by saying gravity at speed and that speed was the speed of light. His idea was if the sun hypothetically stopped its existence, it would be 8 minutes later that the earth would be aware that both the sun's light and the sun's gravity no longer existed. As well he had a mentor who had entered the term space time into scientific lexicon. Time is an agreed method of counting cycles. Like seemingly most everybody else, Albert was seeing time as a cause of events. Not as a manifestation of an intelligence that can count cycles. Naturally and no matter how useful Albert's equations are to pinpointing celestial events, if time is simply an ability of an intelligence to count and consider the continuation of events, it is not part of the cause of Sir Isaac's falling apple. Bringing a force relationship between mass and space into focus was Albert's step forward when it came to gravity. This may or may not disturb a rascal relaxing in the virtue of Newton's third law. There has to be an opposite force to any force that the earth's mass exerts of space. That opposite force would trace to the end of space. According to what we learnt at giraffe university, infinite three dimensional distance is impossible. Each of the three dimensions divides the other two into sections and any distance comprised of sections is itself finite. If this is so we have an original set of equal and opposite forces. One being the expansion of space towards being infinite space. The opposite being the absence of space.

is where the current intellect of the world is. LetThat is where we are at and it is not a wrong place to be. Your wonderful Albert Einstein was more mathematics than physics. Within his persona he did surreptitiously suggest that Sir Isaac had the force of gravity pointing the wrong way. In passing we should mention that Albert involving time in the cause of gravity was not particularly intelligent. He began that part of his overall notion with a consideration of the speed of gravity being that of light. His mentor was entering the term space time into scientific lexicon. So Albert said to himself without further ado that space time is gravity. The first base mistake Albert was making was accepting or seeing time as what makes a clock function. The cause of ageing to be the passing of time. Alas time is an agreed method of counting returns to nigh or original positions. Ageing is caused by wear and tear forces acting upon matter. Not counting this cycle or that cycle. Space, though was a fine entry into the gravity vocabulary. This was a genuine advancement beyond Sir Isaac's stating gravity could only absurdly get from the earth to an apple. So, if we leave time out of Albert's gravity, we have mass exerting a force upon space and hence a vector relating gravity to or connecting mass and gravity.
Albert was, of course, putting force in the opposite direction to Newtonian gravity and allowing you rascals to continue to relax in the beauty of Newton's third law. The opposite force to the force that the earth exerts on space would be, in giraffe language, the end of space. Whether or not an end of space is reality you can spend decide. On current mathematical and geometric intuition about infinity or infinite distance, an end of space is reality. Each or three dimensions divides the other two into sections. Therefore if length, width and breadth exist they exist as a finite and a spherical shape with the nothing of religious intrigue lying beyond the end of space.
So in searching for why an apple falls we can find ourselves on the track to why something exists and that's not too bad, The ancients discovered that the ratio of a circumference to a diameter is an inexact finite never ending number and that's the basic reason. 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 58209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679 82148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128 48111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 44288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091 45648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273 72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436 78925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094 33057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548 07446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912 98336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798 60943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132 00056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872 14684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235 42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960 51870721134999999837297804995105973173281609631859 50244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881 71010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303 59825349042875546873115956286388235378759375195778 18577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989 etcetera. It never ends and we all lived happily forever after except for earthquakes and other calamities. Every point of space potentially is a point is what gravity means. But Newton's third law gets in the way and creates a never ending universe of those potentially infinite points. Those points are the basis of matter would be what all those numbers are trying to say to all of us. Length width and breadth creating the periodic table of elements out of that restricted potentiality and the periodic table of elements being responsible for us and our souls, could that have given rise to elephants, the wind was blowing in the right direction, aren't we lucky. The point being it's not conclusive but the force of gravity could be away from mass. Not towards it. And Newton's third law is not violated by this reckoning of gravity. The day length table that the telescope has procured fits best with this particular non violation. If that is so the moon has already left the earth's gravity field and the universal gravitation formula was never part of the computating its relative mass anyway.

In general, universal gravitation is taught without explanation of how Sir Isaac derived it. Any accounts of its derivation that are hidden away are vague and somewhat incoherent. ((⏱️=1000)) They suggest that he used his second law and casually his third law in some way or other to do the job. ((⏱️=1000))The point is this. However he may or may not have employed his other laws in the exercise, if it wasn't the way demonstrated here, all it can ever have been is a variation or manipulation of those other laws. ((⏱️=1000))It could never have been a law of physics that joined an apple and the earth together with a force. The benefit of attributing the formulation to be the way shown here is this.((⏱️=1000)) It brings his or the true law of gravity into a solid educational focus. Teach that law and the discovery of the motion of the sun, throw in the planetary day length table and your Copernican revolution starts again. ((⏱️=1000))This time from a coherent and logical foundation. The following string of convoluted words is where Sir Isaac forewent his right to claim a knowledgeable understanding of the gravity of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))He suspects he is over stepping the mark.((⏱️=1000))But has gone ahead anyway and ended up telling an apple story while having a cup of tea. At least that is what he has done according to Mister Stookley.

Next, during your process of setting Newton's second law equal to Newton's universal gravitation formula to calculate the constant, the smaller masses are pr<emphasis level="reduced">aren't professors.</emphasis>ocedurally cancelled out from one side of your equation to the other. ((⏱️=1000))All the presence of the small masses are doing is allowing for the measurement of the gravity strength of the larger masses. ((⏱️=1000))Nothing <emphasis level="reduced">more. </emphasis>((⏱️=1000)) The cancelling out of the small masses across the equation returns this three hundred year old ill considered law of universal gravitation to what it always was.((⏱️=1000)) That being Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000)) But now unencumbered by a quaint English story about the earth impossibly falling towards an apple. ((⏱️=1000))At least <emphasis level="reduced">the dinosaurs seem happy.</emphasis>. ((⏱️=1000))And that's good.((⏱️=1000))They

How gravity got from the earth to the apple or the apple to the earth, Sir Isaac did not know. ((⏱️=1000)) However he arrived at his mutual gravitation formula, either wittingly or unwittingly, he was deciding the essence of gravity getting from one mass to another was several arithmetical operations. ((⏱️=1000))Those arithmetical operations being dividing the multiplication of the masses together by the square of the distance separating them. ((⏱️=1500))This played the role of shielding his dilemma about how gravity got from mass A to mass B from the unseen dilemma that a multiplication of masses was creating. ((⏱️=1000))That quandary being this.((⏱️=1000)) If the drawing ability of matter was in proportion to its quantity as Sir Isaac was saying, multiplication is an unfixable disturbance of that considered proportion. ((⏱️=1500))Take 10 kilograms of mass. ((⏱️=1000))Divide it into portions and separate the portions. ((⏱️=1000)) One portion is 1 kilogram and the other is 9 kilograms. ((⏱️=1000))If Newton's formula is sensible, the two masses are drawn together by a force factor of nine. ((⏱️=1000))Next time split the 10 kilograms into portions of 6 and 4 kilograms. Under Newton's formula, the drawing power of that the 10 kilograms of mass is now able to produce has moved up to a factor of 24.((⏱️=1000)) How could that have ever been so? More graphically, when men go to the moon, that is a transfer of mass from the earth to the moon. From a larger mass to a smaller mass. ((⏱️=1000))According to Newtonian gravity science, when men are on the moon, the mutual attraction between the earth and the moon has increased. ((⏱️=1000))If this was so, an explanation of how would be required for the formula to be ethically taught to your next generation.((⏱️=1000))It is bad form to teach things that are not <emphasis level="reduced">true to adolescents.</emphasis>

From the moment the apple leaves the branch, right up until its impact with the earth, the apple gains momentum. ((⏱️=1000))Newton has reasoned that a force has caused that momentum gain. ((⏱️=1000))To evaluate that momentum gain he goes to his second law and gets small m multiplied by a.((⏱️=1000)) From there he says to himself that the momentum change of the apple will be a measure of the force that has caused the apple to fall in the first place. ((⏱️=1000))According to the following Newtonian anecdote, this has perplexed Sir Isaac.((⏱️=1000)) He cannot see how the mass of the earth is able to apply this force to the apple that has just resulted in the momentum gain of the apple. ((⏱️=1000))But he knows that the force is there.

Now, mister or misses professor, with heavy hearts for the last three hundred years of believing in a false law of universal gravitation, we best get onto the realization of what the universal constant really is. ((⏱️=1000)) What you refer to as the universal gravitation constant is really the constant of Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000))This is simple, undeniable and earth changing if you have the honest education of the world in your hearts.((⏱️=1000))You call your method of calculating the constant a Cavendish experiment. ((⏱️=1000))In these experiments the larger masses are always fixed.((⏱️=1000))Scientifically this mean that the presumed drawing powers of the smaller masses are being categorically ignored. ((⏱️=1000))The larger masses do not move towards the smaller masses in the manner that Newton presumed the earth moved towards his falling apple. ((⏱️=1000))Meaning only <emphasis level="reduced">half</emphasis> of Newton's law of universal gravitation is being employed in your calculation of the constant.((⏱️=1000))The whole law in its taught form is not<emphasis level="reduced"> being used.</emphasis>

Now in this half of Newton's confusion between momentum and a force joining two masses together, you will notice that large M and small m are in reversed positions. ((⏱️=500))This time the large Mass represents mass and the small mass represents the cause of the acceleration of the large mass((⏱️=1000))When Newton was considering the momentum gain of the apple, it was the other way around.((⏱️=1000))So, ((⏱️=1000))or whether or not a failing apple stem causes the earth to suddenly move towards an apple, in both cases all he was looking at was momentum change as described by his second law. ((⏱️=1000))He was not looking at a mutual force that joined the earth and the apple together for as long as each existed.((⏱️=1000))This was a bit of bad luck for all concerned.

In general, universal gravitation is taught without explanation of how Sir Isaac derived it. ((⏱️=1000))Any accounts of its derivation that are hidden away are vague and somewhat incoherent. ((⏱️=1000)) They suggest that he used his second law and casually his third law in some way or other to do the job. ((⏱️=1000))The point is this. ((⏱️=1000)) However he may or may not have employed his other laws in the exercise, if it wasn't the way demonstrated here, all it can ever have been is a variation or manipulation of those other laws. ((⏱️=1000))It could never have been a law of physics that joined an apple and the earth together with a force. ((⏱️=1000))The benefit of attributing the formulation to be the way shown here is this.((⏱️=1000)) It brings his or the true law of gravity into a solid educational focus. ((⏱️=1000))Teach that law and the discovery of the motion of the sun, throw in the planetary day length table and your Copernican revolution starts again. ((⏱️=1000))This time from a coherent and logical foundation. ((⏱️=1000))The following string of convoluted words is where Sir Isaac forewent his right to claim a knowledgeable understanding of the gravity of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))He suspects he is over stepping the mark.((⏱️=1000))But has gone ahead anyway and ended up telling an apple story while having a cup of tea.((⏱️=1000)) At least that is what he has done according to Mister Stookley.

So we get to a simulation. ((⏱️=800))It is of Newton's falling apple story and the most probable or realistic way Sir Isaac devised his errant law of universal gravitation that way too many of you falsely believe to be the truth of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))Through his true law of gravity he assesses that the acceleration rate of the plummeting apple is large M divided by d squared. ((⏱️=1000))Large M is the mass of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))D is the distance between the center of the apple and the center of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))As has been mentioned in the original discussion of his true law of gravity, the acceleration rate of the apple, is never precisely knowable.((⏱️=1000)) That acceleration <emphasis level="strong">is A</emphasis> in this simulation.

As this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law here in it's full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=800)) You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun multiplied by itself and then multiplied by the planet's average distance from the sun produces a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system. ((⏱️=1500))Moving away from the sun, the first column contains those planets.((⏱️=800)) Mercury, Venus etcetera. ((⏱️=800)) The next column is vee. The average velocity of a planet relative to the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The one after is Vee multiplied by vee or vee squared. ((⏱️=1000))Then dee, the average distance of the planet from the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The final column is vee squared multiplied by dee. ((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the changing positions of the planets that had been written down by a Danish man who had his nose cut half off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1500)) Tycho Bra was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000)) Bra's night time recordings stand as the best naked eye observations of the planets against the background stars ever.((⏱️=1000))Pity about his scnoz. ((⏱️=1000))As the table completes you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle tune of diminishment of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others. ((⏱️=800))How about<emphasis level="reduced"> that?</emphasis>((⏱️=800))And, of course, pigs do not fly. ((⏱️=1500)) Next we will be going to Newton's true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This law is the only law of gravity that is ever used on this planet. ((⏱️=1000))The problem everyone on earth has is Sir Isaac over cooked it into a false universal truth about the universe.((⏱️=1000))Please come along for the ride.((⏱️=1000))An apple attracting the earth <emphasis level="reduced">simply is not possible.</emphasis>.((⏱️=800)) In the realm of the earth being fixed in the center of the universe, that apple story is another academic delusion that the intelligence of the earth is living through.

Now in this half of the way Newton has been out in his own particular fairyland deriving his fairyland formula, you will notice that large M and small m are in reversed positions. ((⏱️=500))This time the large Mass represents mass and the small mass represents the cause of the acceleration of the large mass((⏱️=1000))When Newton was considering the momentum gain of the apple, it was the other way around.((⏱️=1000))So, or whether or not a failing apple stem causes the earth to suddenly move towards an apple, in both cases all he was looking at was momentum change as described by his second law. ((⏱️=1000))He was not looking at a mutual force that joins the earth and the apple together.((⏱️=1000))Bad luck world.((⏱️=1000))Better luck <emphasis level="reduced">next time.</emphasis>

The notion of the apple drawing the earth was not tethered to reality. ((⏱️=1000))As the moon has pointed out, Sir Isaac's fundamental oversight was in not determining that a smaller gravity field is contained within a larger gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))A smaller gravity field may induce a tidal effect within a larger one. ((⏱️=1000))But a smaller mass drawing a larger mass is not bound to any mathematical truth.((⏱️=1000)) Given Sir Isaac's stated belief in the apple drawing the earth, what he has done next is applied his true law of gravity to the earth from an errant perspective about the apple causing the earth to experience a momentum gain in the direction of the apple. ((⏱️=1500))This gives him a second law mirror image momentum change to that of the apple.((⏱️=1000)) Watch for the earth movement as the apple falls.(((⏱️=5000))That imagined earth movement that you saw is where all the university people on earth are, to some extent or other, living out in fairyland. ((⏱️=1000))It is why professors are still doing guess work in their attempts to understand the tides of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))You can only wonder why your Albert Einstein has gone along with this Newtonian charade about a smaller mass drawing a larger mass.((⏱️=1000))A mathematical genius like Einstein should have picked up this false view of the universe that was doing the world a great intellectual harm. ((⏱️=1000))But he didn't.((⏱️=1000))He only <emphasis level="reduced">added to the mess.</emphasis>((⏱️=1000))

One of the most reputed accounts of Newton and the apple is in William Stukely's Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's Life. ((⏱️=1000))Stukely was a good friend of Newton's and a scholar of archaeology. ((⏱️=1000))He recalled, 'After dinner, the weather being warm, we went into the garden, and drank tea under the shade of some apple trees, only he, and myself. ((⏱️=1000))Amidst other discourse, he told me, he was just in the same situation, as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into his mind. ((⏱️=1000))"Why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground," thought he to himself: ((⏱️=1000))Occasion'd by the fall of an apple, as he sat in a contemplative mood:((⏱️=1000)) "Why should it not go sideways, or upwards? But constantly to the earths centre?((⏱️=1000)) Assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it.((⏱️=1000)) There must be a drawing power in matter. ((⏱️=1000))And, the sum of the drawing power in the matter of the earth must be in the earth’s center, not in any side of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))Therefore dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the center.((⏱️=1000)) If matter thus draws matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. ((⏱️=1000))Therefore the apple draws the earth, as well as the earth draws the apple."

If the apple accelerates, Newton contends to himself it must be subject to one of his second law forces.((⏱️=1000)) As we will see directly, he does not know how such a force can be so. ((⏱️=1000))Next Sir Isaac considers the momentum change of his falling apple. ((⏱️=1000))From his true law of gravity, the acceleration rate of the apple is the mass of the earth divided by the square of the distance between the center of the earth and the apple. ((⏱️=1000))Which is large M divided by d squared on our simulation. ((⏱️=1000))When he multiplies this acceleration by the mass of the apple, his second law gives him the momentum change of his apple. ((⏱️=1000))He goes on to call this his law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac's problem of consequence is the momentum change of an apple is not a connecting force between the apple and the earth. ((⏱️=1000)) He skated right past this dilemma. ((⏱️=1000))We can only presume he was having a rush of blood.((⏱️=1000))He needed to eat the apple and entertain the universe some more before declaring momentum change to be universal gravitation.

So we get to a simulation. ((⏱️=800))It is of Newton's falling apple rhetoric and the only realistic way Sir Isaac devised his errant law of universal gravitation that way too many of you falsely believe to be the truth of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))Through his true law of gravity he assesses that the acceleration rate of the plummeting apple is large M divided by d squared. ((⏱️=1000))Large M is the mass of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))D is the distance between the center of the apple and the center of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))As has been mentioned in the original discussion of his true law of gravity, the acceleration rate of the apple, is never precisely knowable.((⏱️=1000)) That acceleration <emphasis level="strong">is A</emphasis> in this simulation.

Something like the way a billiard ball does, this green ball will be shown to accelerate when the force of a cue is applied to it.((⏱️=800)) Newton's second law describes a relationship between the force applied to a body and the acceleration that the applied force causes the body to experience. ((⏱️=1000))The greater the applied force, proportionally the greater the acceleration rate of the body.((⏱️=1000)) Conversely, the greater the mass magnitude of the body being accelerated, proportionally the less the rate of the acceleration of the body.((⏱️=1000)) Or, in symbol form, F is proportional to the product of m and A. ((⏱️=1000)) F is the applied force, M is the mass magnitude of the body the force is being applied to. ((⏱️=1000)) A is the rate of acceleration the body experiences.((⏱️=1000)) Less any external resistance to the acceleration, <emphasis level="reduced">of course.</emphasis> ((⏱️=1000))When investigating the method Newton used to convert his second law into a mistaken mutual attraction between the earth and an apple, resistance to an applied force is not a concern. ((⏱️=1000))But this relationship between force and acceleration is Newton's second law.

It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, ((⏱️=800))without the mediation of something else which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact, as it must be, ((⏱️=800))if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus, be essential and inherent in it. ((⏱️=1500))And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe innate gravity to me.((⏱️=1500)) That gravity should be innate,((⏱️=500)) inherent,((⏱️=800)) and essential to matter, ((⏱️=800))so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, ((⏱️=800))without the mediation of anything else, ((⏱️=800))by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, ((⏱️=800))is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. ((⏱️=1500))Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; ((⏱️=1000))but whether this agent be material or immaterial, ((⏱️=800))I have left open to the consideration of my readers.

Now. ((⏱️=1000))Professors. ((⏱️=1000))You are quite possibly familiar with this convoluted written quote from Sir Isaac. ((⏱️=1000))Back in his day, Sir Isaac has brought himself to the point of saying the physics of his universal law of gravitation have him completely beat. ((⏱️=1000))He concludes by saying no sane person will ever understand it.((⏱️=1000))Only a giraffe ever will.((⏱️=1000))The giraffe bit is a joke.((⏱️=500))<emphasis level="reduced">Ha ha ha.</emphasis> ((⏱️=500))Separate from his failure to mathematically deal with the opposite directions of fall along the axis that runs between adjacent masses, his further problem seems to have been less than a full appreciation that his apple was not falling with a constant momentum gain. ((⏱️=1000)). As far as the measuring abilities of his day went, the apple's momentum gain was indeed constant.((⏱️=1000))A proper awareness of the inverse square law says this isn't true at all.((⏱️=1000)) Puzzlement about the increasing rate of acceleration of his falling apple would have been good for the future.((⏱️=800))In lieu of that, we are all still stuck back in this shocking intellectual mess that Newton knew <emphasis level="reduced">he was i<emphasis level="reduced">Please.</emphasis>n.</emphasis>((⏱️=1000))Can we get out of it.((⏱️=800))

Thanks Lenny.((⏱️=1000)) That was Lenny the extinct lizard.((⏱️=1000)) Our objective can only be to make this mess of a diagram of the same nature. ((⏱️=1000))The moon has pointed out the first base mathematical problem with the arrangement you see in front of your eyes. ((⏱️=1000))Mathematically the gravity field of m two is contained within the gravity field of m one. ((⏱️=1000))The message is a smaller mass may tidally influence a larger mass. ((⏱️=1000))But the larger mass itself is not subject to an acceleration towards the smaller mass whatsoever. ((⏱️=1000))So how did Sir Isaac come up with the array of words that led to this diagram that was trying to say the whole universe is a completed attraction of itself to itself. ((⏱️=1000))We have had a look at his true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))So why don't we relax down and have a gander at Newton's second law.

So here we have our satellite view of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))The growing circle you see around the earth is a depiction of its gravity field.((⏱️=1000)) The size of the diminishing arrows is a representation of the rate of fall towards the earth that the gravity field is causing at the distance of the arrow from the earth. ((⏱️=1000))As you can see that rate is decreasing as a direct proportion of the area increase of the gravity field.((⏱️=1500)) Strictly the area increase is not a two dimensional circle. ((⏱️=800))It is the three dimensional curved surface area of a spherical shape around the earth.

Whether or not Newton's true law of gravity was Newton's original work may be historically debatable.((⏱️=1000)) It is what his untrue law of universal gravitation is built on. ((⏱️=1000))So he has definitely been aware of it. ((⏱️=1000))On the other hand, he only articulated an untrue law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1000))He did not write this true one down.((⏱️=1000))In Newton's error new science carried a great prestige.((⏱️=1000)) Great enough to echo into the future right up until today. ((⏱️=1000))With that sort of priority power at play, double dealing plagiarism was not unheard of((⏱️=1000)) Newton may have plundered his true law of gravity from a peer for all we know today. ((⏱️=1000))Another angle of consideration is this. ((⏱️=1000))If you were gravity orientated, it would not take a chance fruit falling sighting to bring your focus to gravity. ((⏱️=1000))It is where your mind would be anyway. ((⏱️=1000))By the time he was telling the apple story, he had overwhelmed the academic world with pages and pages of mathematical advancement. ((⏱️=1000))On this account no one was being skeptical about his strange idea deeming an apple and the earth to exert an equal force on each other. ((⏱️=1000))Thus there is a reasonable chance he invented the apple story in his later life to hide the uncertainty he was carrying about his description of the tides and his hope it was right law of universal gravitation((⏱️=1000))All this means there is a question mark about who first doodled down a rate of acceleration towards mass M is directly proportional to M and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of M that the acceleration is happening at. ((⏱️=1000))That true law in itself needs a little tidying up by now. ((⏱️=1000)) Today you know that the inverse square law breaks down beneath the surface of M.((⏱️=1000))Also the fact that the rate of acceleration increases during a descent carries the meaning of the universal constant never being exactly calculatable((⏱️=1000)) Now onto Newton's second law and the mayhem Newton has created in the minds of subsequent professors

This is a diagram of that untrue law. ((⏱️=800))In simple terms it says the earth and the apple exerted equivalent forces on each other. ((⏱️=1000))If you have sufficient common sense to say this is not going to be correct.((⏱️=800)) The earth is a bit bigger than that apple, you could choose to continue with what you were otherwise doing.((⏱️=1000)) As you wander off, that is not to say that your average professor maintaining this earth apple educational absurdity does not have a modicum of common sense. ((⏱️=1000))Most of them can tie shoe laces.((⏱️=1000))Which is much more than what<emphasis level="reduced"> I can do.</emphasis> ((⏱️=1000))In word form Newton's untrue law of universal gravitation states

As this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law here in it's full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=800)) You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun multiplied by itself and then multiplied by the planet's average distance from the sun produces a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system. ((⏱️=1500))Moving away from the sun, the first column contains those planets.((⏱️=800)) The next column is vee. The average velocity of a planet relative to the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The one after is Vee multiplied by vee or vee squared. ((⏱️=1000))Then dee, the average distance of the planet from the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The final column is vee squared multiplied by dee. ((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the remarkable stellar records of a Danish man who had his nose cut half off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1500)) Tycho Bra was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000)) He seems to have been a bit of a drunk but his night time stellar observations stand as the best naked eye observations ever.((⏱️=1000))As the table completes you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle mathematical tune of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others. ((⏱️=800))How about<emphasis level="reduced"> that?</emphasis>((⏱️=800))And, of course, pigs do not fly. ((⏱️=1500)) Next we will be going to Newton's true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This law is the only law of gravity that is ever used on this planet. ((⏱️=1000))The problem everyone on earth has is Sir Isaac over cooked it into a false universal truth about the universe.((⏱️=1000))Please come along for the ride.((⏱️=1000))It's going to be<emphasis level="reduced"> fun.</emphasis>

We will need to be discussing in verse square law fall rate diminishment. Whether you are a professor in charge of the science of the planet or a bystander, the inverse square law should
be the right and proper place to begin.
We will need to be discussing in verse square faul rate diminishment.((⏱️=1500)) Whether you are a professor in charge of the science of the planet or a bystander, the in verse square law should be the right and proper plAs this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law in it's full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=800)) You will see the average relative velocity of a planet squared multiplied by a planet's average distance from the sun producing a nigh constant for all the planets of the solar system. ((⏱️=1000))The average relative velocity is denoted by the letter Vee. ((⏱️=1000))Dee represents the average distance of a planet from the sun. ((⏱️=1000)) As the table completes you have both Kepler's third law and the origin of your original understanding of the quaint mathematical tune of fall rate diminishment with distance in a gravity field. ((⏱️=800))How about <emphasis level="reduced">that?</emphasis>and, of course, pigs don't fly.ace to begin this particular discussion.
As this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law here in it's full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=800)) You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun squared multiplied by that planet's average distance from the sun producing a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system. ((⏱️=1500)) The first column, vee, is that average velocity. ((⏱️=1000))The next, Vee squared, is vee multiplied by vee. ((⏱️=1000))Then dee, the average distance of the planet from the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The final column is vee squared multiplied by dee. ((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the remarkable stellar observations and records of a Danish man who had his nose cut half off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1500)) Tycho Bra was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000)) His night time stellar observations stand as the best non telescope assisted observations ever.((⏱️=1000)) As the table completes you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle mathematical tune of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others. ((⏱️=800))How about<emphasis level="reduced"> that?</emphasis>((⏱️=800))And, of course, pigs do not fly. ((⏱️=1500)) Next we will be going to Newton's true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This law is the only law of gravity that is ever used on this planet. ((⏱️=1000))The problem everyone on earth has is Sir Isaac over cooked it into a false universal truth ((⏱️=1000))Please come along for the ride.((⏱️=1000))It's going to be<emphasis level="reduced"> fun.</emphasis>
As this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law here in it's full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=800)) You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun squared multiplied by that planet's average distance from the sun producing a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system. ((⏱️=1500)) The first column, vee, is that average velocity. ((⏱️=1000))The next, Vee squared, is vee multiplied by vee. ((⏱️=1000))Then dee, the average distance of the planet from the sun. ((⏱️=1000))The final column is vee squared multiplied by dee. ((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the remarkable stellar observations and records of a Danish man who had his nose cut half off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1500)) Tycho Bra was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000)) His night time stellar observations stand as the best non telescope assisted observations ever.((⏱️=1000)) As the table completes you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle mathematical tune of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others. ((⏱️=800))How about<emphasis level="reduced"> that?</emphasis>((⏱️=800))And, of course, pigs do not fly. ((⏱️=1500)) Next we will be going to Newton's true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This law is the only law of gravity that is ever used on this planet. ((⏱️=1000))The problem everyone on earth has is Sir Isaac over cooked it into a false universal truth ((⏱️=1000))Please come along for the ride.((⏱️=1000))It's going to be<emphasis level="reduced"> fun.</emphasis>

We will now go to Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=2000)) In it's Newtonian word form it states that the rate of acceleration towards a mass of magnitude M is directly proportional to M and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of M that the acceleration is happening at. ((⏱️=2000))This law is a known truth and is the law of gravity that is used to calculate the mass magnitudes of other celestial bodies.((⏱️=1000))Believing that Newton's complex law of universal gravitation is necessary for this task is a high order and shameful academic charade. ((⏱️=1000))In its own best interest, the world needs to get past this universal gravitation pantomime.
Whether or not Sir Isaac was the original champion of this law of gravity is debatable. ((⏱️=1000))In Newton's era new science carried prestige. ((⏱️=1000))In an unpleasant way this was causing narcissistic plagiarism to at times happen. ((⏱️=800))So Newton may have taken it from one of his peers. ((⏱️=1500))What we do know is this law of gravity is contained within and where his mistaken law of universal gravitation begins before going awry. ((⏱️=1500))So Newton has definitely been aware of it. ((⏱️=2000))Beyond that origin question mark you can see that the inverse square law of fall rate diminishment is in this true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This true law incorporates mass or quantity and the inverse square law into one consummate law. ((⏱️=1500))Whoever originally put this true law of gravity together, there is a touch of genius to it. ((⏱️=2000))There is a constant to this law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))Currently this constant is mistakenly attributed to Newton's erroneous law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1500))As well the true law as stated in this Newtonian form does not deal with the rate of fall decreasing beneath the surface of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))It does not recognize the fact that a measured rate of acceleration in an inverse square law can never be an exact measurement((⏱️=1000)) This is because the rate of acceleration is increasing during the measurement.((⏱️=1500)) Next we will go to how Sir Isaac has confused the momentum change of a falling apple with a mutual attraction between the earth and that falling apple. ((⏱️=1000))This was a careless mistake on Newton's part. ((⏱️=1500))Hopefully the explanation will be putting the whole world back on the sane savannah.
Yes. I am here. ((⏱️=800))And yes I can explain to you how Sir Isaac Newton confused himself into believing in a universal gravitation and I can do it for free. ((⏱️=2000))First please let me skirt past these felines. ((⏱️=2000))Then we will discuss inverse square fall rate diminishment.((⏱️=1500)) Whether you are a professor or a bystander of this running amok planet, the inverse square law should be the proper place to begin.
So here we have our satellite view of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))The growing circle you see around the earth is a depiction of its gravity field.((⏱️=1000)) The size of the diminishing arrows is a representation of the rate of fall towards the earth that the gravity field is causing at the distance of the arrow from the earth. ((⏱️=1000))As you can see that rate decreases as a direct proportion of the area increase of the gravity field.((⏱️=1500)) Strictly the area increase is not a two dimensional circle. It is the three dimensional curved surface of a spherical shape around the earth.
If you have earned the right to enter a university you should have already learnt this. ((⏱️=1500))Unfortunately many leave their universities without this basic understanding. ((⏱️=1500))Historically and in an ad hoc way, this gravity field truth was deduced from what is known as Kepler's third law. ((⏱️=1000))Johannes Kepler was a German born in fifteen seventy one.((⏱️=800)) His mother was accused of having made a pact with the devil.((⏱️=1000)) Of being a witch.((⏱️=800))Anyway he took to lawyering and eventually got her off. ((⏱️=800)) Afterwards Johannes returned to his fixed sun planetary motion work.((⏱️=800))With all due respect to Johannes and his innocent mother, educationally, it is rather good to now know that the sun is moving around a galaxy.
((⏱️=5000))This is Kepler's third law here.((⏱️=1500)) In its most succinct form it says the average orbital velocity, denoted here with the letter Vee, of a planet relative to the sun squared multiplied by a planet's average distance from the sun is a nigh constant for all the planets of the solar system.((⏱️=1000)) This distance from the sun is represented here with the letter Dee. ((⏱️=3000))For each planet you can see the square of a planet's speed relative to the sun is decreasing as the sun is moved away from.((⏱️=1500)) That is where a relationship between the curved surface area surrounding a gravity field and the fall rate the gravity field imparts were originally seen to be universally connected. ((⏱️=1500))The seemingly unrecognized implication of Kepler's third law is the sun's gravity directly causes a planet's velocity relative to the sun. ((⏱️=1000))Perhaps some speedy gazelle or other can explain this implication to you later.((⏱️=1500))At this stage, basically the more students learning the way the fall rate of a gravity field diminishes with area increase, the better the future of the world. ((⏱️=3000))We will now go to Newton's true law of gravity.

If you have earned the right to enter a university you should have already learnt this. ((⏱️=1500))Unfortunately many leave their universities without this basic understanding. ((⏱️=1500))Historically and in an ad hoc way, this gravity field truth was deduced from what is known as Kepler's third law. ((⏱️=2000))Johannes Kepler was a German born in fifteen seventy one.((⏱️=800)) His mother was accused of witchcraft. ((⏱️=800))He eventually got her off. ((⏱️=800)) She wasn't a witch after all ((⏱️=5000))This is Kepler's third law here. You can see the square of a planet's speed relative to the sun is decreasing as the sun is moved away from.((⏱️=1500)) That is where a relationship between the curved surface area of a gravity field and the fall rate the gravity field imparts were originally seen to be universally connected. ((⏱️=1500))The seemingly unrecognized implication of this is the sun's gravity directly causes a planet's speed relative to the sun. Perhaps some speedy gazelle or other can explain this to you later.((⏱️=1500))At this stage, basically the more students learning the way the fall rate of a gravity field diminishes with area increase, the better the future of the world. ((⏱️=3000))We will now go to Newton's true law of gravity.

We will now go to Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=2000)) In it's Newtonian form it states that the rate of acceleration towards a mass of magnitude M is directly proportional to that magnitude and inversely proportion to the square of the distance from the center of M that that the acceleration is happening at. This law is true and, as we will discuss, is the law of gravity that is used to calculate the mass magnitudes of other celestial bodies.((⏱️=10000))Whether or not Sir Isaac was the original expounder of this law of gravity is debatable. ((⏱️=1000))In Newton's era original science carried prestige. ((⏱️=1000))In an unpleasant way, this was causing narcissistic plagiarism to at times happen. ((⏱️=1000))So Newton may have taken it from one of his peers. ((⏱️=1000))What we do know is this law of gravity is contained within and is what Newton's untrue law of gravity begins with before going awry. ((⏱️=1500))So Newton has definitely been aware of it.((⏱️=1500))Beyond that origin question mark you can see the inverse square law of fall rate diminishment in this true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This true law incorporates mass or quantity and the inverse square law into one consummate law.((⏱️=1000))Whether or not it was Newton's original deduction, there is a touch of new science genius to Newton's true law of gravity.((⏱️=1000))For all the loony tunes nature of universal gravitation, the world as a particle of the universe can be proud of arriving at this fundamental law of the nature of the universe that it is a part of.

As the centuries have ensued after Sir Isaac wrote this paragraph clearly stating that he felt out of his depth when it came to understanding the gravity of the universe, no educated person on earth has stepped forward and explained how Sir Isaac came up with his universal gravitation formula.((⏱️=1000)) This is a real weakness in the earth's understanding of the universe.((⏱️=1000))Beyond the moon having already said it's just his second law twice, this is what we say here on the savannah. ((⏱️=1000))Whether or not the falling apple story that Sir Isaac began saying in his later life is true, let's assume it is true. ((⏱️=1000))However it is more likely that, in his younger days, the falling apple has, if effect, been the moon and his presumed drawing of an earth ocean towards the moon. ((⏱️=1000))The moon has already explained the inordinate problem with that postulate. ((⏱️=1000))But let's just say the falling apple story is true.((⏱️=1000))

Whether or not Sir Isaac was the original champion of this law of gravity is debatable. ((⏱️=1000))In Newton's era new science carried prestige. ((⏱️=1000))In an unpleasant way this was causing narcissistic plagiarism to at times happen. ((⏱️=800))So Newton may have taken it from one of his peers. ((⏱️=1500))What we do know is this law of gravity is contained within and where his mistaken law of universal gravitation begins before going awry. ((⏱️=1500))So Newton has definitely been aware of it. ((⏱️=2000))Beyond that origin question mark you can see that the inverse square law of fall rate diminishment is in this true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))This true law incorporates mass or quantity and the inverse square law into one consummate law. ((⏱️=1500))Whoever originally put this true law of gravity together, there is a touch of genius to it. ((⏱️=2000))There is a constant to this law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))Currently this constant is mistakenly attributed to Newton's erroneous law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1500))As well the true law as stated in this Newtonian form does not deal with the rate of fall decreasing beneath the surface of the earth. ((⏱️=1000))It does not recognize the fact that a measured rate of acceleration in an inverse square law can never be an exact measurement((⏱️=1000)) This is because the rate of acceleration is increasing during the measurement.((⏱️=1500)) Next we will go to how Sir Isaac has confused the momentum change of a falling apple with a mutual attraction between the earth and that falling apple. ((⏱️=1000))This was a careless mistake on Newton's part. ((⏱️=1500))To understand Sir Isaac's negligence we will first become familiar with Newton's second law.

Yes. I am here. ((⏱️=800))And yes I can explain to you how Sir Isaac Newton confused himself into believing in a universal gravitation and I can do it for free. ((⏱️=2000))First please let me skirt past these felines. ((⏱️=2000))Then we will discuss inverse square fall rate diminishment.((⏱️=1500)) Whether you are a professor in charge of the science of the planet or a bystander, the inverse square law should be the proper place to begin.

Sir Isaac Newton is having trouble in his spaceship. ((⏱️=800))He can not return to earth to explain the error of his ways. ((⏱️=800))But Herbert the giraffe should be able to elucidate what the moon meant when he said Newton's universal gravitation is Newton's second law twice. ((⏱️=800))Herbert has a long neck and thus the best upper level view of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))Herbert. ((⏱️=1500))Are <emphasis level="strong">you there?.</emphasis> Professors needs you.

Sir Isaac Newton is having trouble in his spaceship. ((⏱️=800))He can not return to earth to explain the error of his ways. ((⏱️=800))But Herbert the giraffe should be able to elucidate what the moon meant when he said Newton's universal gravitation is Newton's second law twice. ((⏱️=800))Herbert has a long neck and thus the best upper level view of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))Herbert. ((⏱️=1500))Are <emphasis level="strong">you there?.</emphasis> Professors needs you.

When you are too shy, <emphasis level="strong">nondescript</emphasis> and old to lead the world what do you do.((⏱=2000)) As a general rule, this is what you do do. ((⏱=500))You usher the world away from Sir Isaac Newton's apple story.((⏱=1500)) Then hope for the best for all and sundry.((⏱️=2500)) The lead away is the earth sun tidal axis has entered the Venus orbit of the sun. ((⏱️=1500))That is why Venus is turning backwards in sync with the earth's orbital period.((⏱=1500))If this is correct, in this first video you can see a very unlikely world escort service squeezing a ball.((⏱️=800))For better or worse, the escorting will include movements away from <emphasis level="strong">God and into the fundamentals of length, width and breadth. </emphasis>((⏱️=1500))Enjoy this fresh knowledge and also planet earth for as long as it lasts.
Well the people of the world are unlikely to believe that their <emphasis level="strong">moon can even </emphasis>torque.((⏱️=1000))Let alone anything about Sir Isaac Newton making a mistake in his younger days. ((⏱️=1000)) Never the less. thank u. ((⏱️=1000))Thank u for being such a darling orbiter in these times of confusion of human purpose. ((⏱️=1000))Naturally if your words are truth we are eternally grateful to you for doing this clarifying of both of our high tides. ((⏱️=2000))Now ((⏱️=1500))Universal gravitation is Newton's second law twice you say? ((⏱️=1000))That is very interesting. ((⏱️=800))It may mean that professors at large need to do a bunch of fresh thought about all of the stuff their previous celestial beliefs have been cooking up for us as we go about our daily lives. ((⏱️=1500))With that said, picturing professors clambering to be accountable for a tidal mistake that they are perpetuating is a hard task to undertake.((⏱️=1000)) They are all so completely lost in Newton's apple story being the secret to the universe. ((⏱️=1000)) Honestly they really are not going to be of much yuse when it comes to the tides being the equal and opposite forces of the earth. ((⏱️=1000)) Moon I love you <emphasis level="strong">dearly</emphasis> anyway.
Hello. How are you. The world needed leading away from Sir Isaac Newton's untrue law of the universe. This errant every particle law from the past was still holding successive generations separate from understanding data of the solar system that telescopes were procuring. ((⏱️=1500))At least that was the opinion of a man who had seen through the fabrication of the law when he was younger and had been squeezing balls to understand or explain why we observe like tides on direct opposite sides of the earth for several decades now. ((⏱️=2000))Religion and mathematical physics were in charge of what adults were teaching children to be the truth of the universe. But neither of these doctrines were able to explain why Venus is turning backwards in sync with the orbital period of the earth. The ball squeezing man thought he could. So here it went. The beginning of leading the world away from Sir Isaac Newton's untrue law of the universe.

This video is not as heavy going as these introductory words. ((⏱️=1000))When swivel point of history is said, the criteria is two fold. ((⏱️=800))The first is a celestial discovery. ((⏱️=800))Sometime last century, the superior motion of the sun around the milky way galaxy came to light. ((⏱️=1000))At a young age we are pointedly taught that the earth was originally believed to be fixed in the centre of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))After a few thousand years this didn't seem to fit with the paths other planets were observed to be following through the night time sky. ((⏱️=800))So then it was decided that it is the sun and not the earth that was fixed in the centre of the universe. ((⏱️=1000))We now know that this also isn't true. ((⏱️=1000))The sun is moving around a galaxy at a superior speed again. ((⏱️=800))This has never been corrected at the lower school learning level.((⏱️=1000)) At a young age we are given an impression of a sun fixed in space.((⏱️=800)) This in turn creates an impression of gravity fields also being fixed in space. ((⏱️=1500)) The motion of the sun's gravity field is in fact the base reason the planets are able to orbit the sun. ((⏱️=1000))At this stage we are taught through false mathematical physics reasoning that the velocity of a planet counteracts an acceleration towards the sun and a planet stays up here where we are. ((⏱️=800))In honest physics only an acceleration can counteract another acceleration.((⏱️=1500))
The other turning point for planet earth is something that it is not likely that anyone else on the planet is working on. ((⏱️=1000))And that is why we experience 24 hours in a day. ((⏱️=1000))Or, more specifically, why the coincidences of the day length table of the planets appear as they do. ((⏱️=1000))From this the probability is the day lengths that the planets experience is a direct factor of the turn rates of their tidally interlocked gravity fields. ((⏱️=1000))When the basic known facts of the turn rates of the planets become part of junior school education the world should change for the better. ((⏱️=1000))Young people will be making up their own minds about why we have 24 hours in a day as they move into their positions of deciding the future of the world that they are a part of. ((⏱️=1000))
Both of these potential swivel points of history are introduced at the end of this video and both need their own video. ((⏱️=1500))This particular video is primarily a door opening to Sir Isaac Newton having done something abnormal.((⏱️=1000)) He hasn't considered the mathematical impact of opposite directions of gravity along the axis that runs between adjacent celestial bodies. ((⏱️=1000))Whilst he has come up with a true law of gravity during his day, this true law only pertains to one celestial body in isolation. ((⏱️=1000))Not to the way two celestial bodies are mutually attracting each other as we are taught at school. ((⏱️=1500))When space agencies and professional calculators of the universal gravitation constant get honest about what they do and what they know, they will only be able to admit that all they ever use is his true law of gravity. ((⏱️=800))Which is a rate of acceleration towards celestial mass M is directly proportional to the magnitude of M and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the centre of M that the acceleration is happening at. ((⏱️=1000))That too needs its own video. ((⏱️=1000)) A few other things do as well.((⏱️=1500))
In March 2023 a physics professor, the Head of the Melbin university physics department, was confronted with Sir Isaac Newton's mutual mistake. The second Russian invasion of Ukraine was a year old and the democratic world definitely needed a wake up call.((⏱️=1000)) The state of the world has deteriorated since then. In keeping with the professor's encouragement, this video is his requested publication. ((⏱️=1500))
If these history swivel points come to be, they mean that the predictive world of Albert Einstein has always been a human charade. Useful through chance. Ridiculous in essence.((⏱️=1500)) The likely origin or reason of life is the centre of the absolute biggest circle.((⏱️=1000)) Space is mathematically demonstratable as being finite is the break through of logic. ((⏱️=1000)) Pie doing an advancing sophistication of its own calculation is most probably what the universe is and who knows where that ends. ((⏱️=1500))If I get far enough, I can add a little more reasoning to that Pi rationale. ((⏱️=1500))Also there is no reason associated with the universe being pi calculating its self that says that our consciousness does not survive our bodies. ((⏱️=2000))The attitude is while we have the world we might as well make the most of it. ((⏱️=1000))And until we get the discovery of the motion of the sun and the planetary day length table into popular consciousness young people are not going to be making the most of their lives. ((⏱️=1000))They are still going to be fighting wars against each other when they grow older.((⏱️=800))The true voice you can hear briefly next.((⏱️=1000))The making of a blog about the luxury trip around Australia didn't last long. ((⏱️=800))Sorry.((⏱️=800)) Put on 10 kilograms during the trip. ((⏱️=800)) On the positive side a conclusion that a true academic was driving the car happened. ((⏱️=2000))Meaning I am comfortable leading the world on the outlined academic terms.((⏱️=800)) The inference being everyone on earth needs to be putting a question mark against the virtue of current academia. ((⏱️=800))When that question mark begins, the goodness of humanity can begin to rise and overcome and free Russia from its self. ((⏱️=1000)) If you or the world do not like this kind of leadership, all the best.

Another worthwhile place to set a question mark is against the sanity of veto power and super majorities. Both allow a minority to have power over the majority. If the EU, the USA and the United Nations did not employ these ill conceived methods, the world would be a better place.((⏱️=800)) Every country on earth should be aiming for a simply majority democratic constitution.

With knowledge of the superior motion of the sun around the galaxy and also a rationale of why Venus turns backwards relative to the earth, the world can move beyond its olden day Copernican revolution. ((⏱️=1500))
The video you about to see was made prior to a two thousand and twenty five drive around Australia. ((⏱️=500))Towards the end of the trip, the notion of being a true academic was sitting comfortably. ((⏱️=1500))The making of the trip blog didn't last long. ((⏱️=800))But the first days are there to give you an idea of who your true academic is,((⏱️=1500))The overall idea is for governments to make the most of the miracle that the earth is while we can. ((⏱️=1500))First and foremost academia has to wake up to its discovery of the superior motion of the sun. And also properly respect the planetary day length accuracies that it has more recently procured. ((⏱️=1000))Then start thinking afresh and more logically about the solar system from there. ((⏱️=1500))The true academic maker is now in his seventies.((⏱️=1500)) If you are young, he says the world belongs to you. Also the universe is the inexact relationship between the absolute biggest circle and its diameter. Please enjoy the rest of your life. The message is we probably survive our bodies. ((⏱️=1000)) All space is matter and Albert Einstein was stupid.

With knowledge of the superior motion of the sun around the galaxy and also a rationale of why Venus turns backwards relative to the earth, the world can move beyond its olden day Copernican revolution. ((⏱️=1500))
The video you about to see was made prior to a two thousand and twenty five drive around Australia. ((⏱️=500))The making of the trip blog didn't last long. (

Didn't speak into the phone much from
here. AI can read a script to you. Sounds
better than me anyway. So went for a
drive around Australia on the
aforementioned schedule.
Knew I wasn't a hero or a genius
before we left. It did cross my mind
towards the end, though, that what I
am is a true academic. If I was going
to lead the world by delivering Sir Isaac
Newton's simple mistakes, that was
comfortable.

Geraldton was put on the breathalyzer. The cop said magnificent. Puzzling. I had
had two beers. A quick look at the Sydney memorial and onto Carnarvon. Then
Exmouth for a few days and more second world war education. Karratha for a
few more days. Gas. Port Headland and Marble Bar. Road trains.
Broome. Give me Broome or give me death. Love it there. Derby, Fitzroy Crossing
and Halls Creek. Good see what these names on the map were. Kununurra. That
worked too. Katherine, where we had been before. Tennant Creek not too bad and
then Mt isa. Had the car serviced. The Ks were mounting up. As were the waistline
kilograms. Longreach. The stockman's hall of fame annoyed me. Could have just
been the mood I was in. Fond memory of a little place called Alpha on the way to
Emerald. Emerald itself was an awareness of being on the other side of the country.
Then Yeppoon for six days. That was real holiday. Hervey bay for another six. Too
much holiday. Then on to Brisbane for Essendon Brisbane game. Entertaining
but a loss for the Bombers. Ipswich next day for the the reserves game.
Then down the coast staying at Coffs Harbor, Gosford, Bates man bay and Lakes
Entrance. Tarwin Lower to drop off a the prize to the winner of last years footy
tipping. I keep coming last. Watch Essendon too much. Did win it one year.
Melbourne Cricket Ground for the Essendon Carlton for the monarchy birthday eve
game and the footy trip was done, Carlton was easily.
Then home to Stawell and the grave of our son. In a seemingly unique emotional
turmoil, he had taken his own life six years earlier. I blame myself big time. But
the trip, well it lessened that a little. Love you Abraham. Your parents were out of
their depth. Probably shouldn't have been.
At this point of time the first step to fixing up the world would be taking care of
Obama derangement syndrome. A Nobel peace prize for Donald Trump as often
as required should start that going. To settle the deal Barrack Obama handing his
back would be neat. Why would awards be the way to peace anyway.
This is the 2023 email. The one the Australian government used to turn world
leadership over to an old man. This the publication they asked for. At that stage
Ukraine had made me say to myself Australian academia must lead the world
against this Russian problem. I will insert Dmitri Mendeleev's name here but most
won't understand what the reason for that is. If you don't like this academic
leadership blame Australian voters and Captain Cook. I would rather the
government in charge doing their job. You can't stand by like a professor might
when young men are dying for democracy and Moscow missiles are slaughtering
children on a daily basis. The world may not be gong to survive long term anyway.
But it definitely won't with an English dude leading us out into the universe in
the manner that he currently is and I don't mean Captain Cook.
Thus you are commended to start thinking about the weight of the centre of the
planet you are on. That is where world peace can begin. If you agree that it is
weightless, our descendants will probably be considering this planet to be the
miracle that it is. What is meant by a true academic is someone who only believes
what academia already says is the truth when it makes sense. Neither the way the
tides or planetary motion made much sense the way they were taught. On a
personal note, you can get sick of knowing Sir Isaac newton made mistakes.
But anyway. That's my problem. Not yours. Hope to get as far as relative motions
of gravity fields. I know you love Albert Einstein but he was a naughty boy cult
leader.
Thanks AI voice for talking for me. Jake Broe you inspire me. Barry thanks for
the editing advice.

Went for a drive around Australia. Knew I wasn't a hero or a genius before I left. It crossed my mind towards the end of the trip that what I am is a true academic. If I was going to lead the world by delivering Sir Isaac Newton's simple mistakes, that was comfortable. The trip, it was more or less a footy one. First stop was Adelaide for Gather round. Across the Nullabor for West Coast and Essendon. A couple of wins for the bombers. Geraldton was put on the breathalyzer. The cop said magnificent. Puzzling. I had had two beers. A quick look at the Sydney memorial and onto Carnarvon. Then Exmouth for a few days and more second world education. Karratha for a few more days. Gas. Port Headland and Marble Bar. Broome. Give me Broome or give me death. Love it there. Derby, Fitzroy crossing and halls creek Good see what these names on the map were. Kununmarra. That worked to. Katherine, where we had been before. Tennant Creek not too bad and then Mt isa. Had the car serviced. The Ks were mounting up. As were the waistline kilograms. Longreach the stockmans hall of fame annoyed me. Could have just been the mood I was in. Fond memory of a little place called Alpha on the way to emaral. Emerald itself was an education. Then Yeppoon for six days. That was real holiday. Hervey bay for another six too much holiday. Then down to Brisbane for Essendon Brisbane game. Entertaining but a loss for the bombers. Ipswich next day for the the reserves game. Then down the coast staying at Coffs Harbour, Gosford, Batesman bay and Lakes Entrance. Tarwin Lower to drop off a the prize to thw winner of last years footy tipping. Essendon Carlton for the monarchy birthday eve game and it was done, Carlton was easily. Then home to Stawell and the grave of our son. In a seemingly unique emotional turmoil, he had taken his own life six years earlier. I blame myself big time. But the trip, well it lessened that a little. Love you Abraham. Your parents were out of their depth. Probably shouldn't have been. At this point of time the first step to fixing up the world would be taking care of Obama derangement syndrome. A Nobel peace prize for Donald Trump as often as required should start that going. To settle the deal Barrack Obama handing his back would be neat. Awards aren't the way to peace. This is the 2023 email. The one the Australian government used to turn world leadership over to an old man. At that stage Ukraine had made me say to myself Australian academia must lead the world against this Russian problem. I will insert dimiri Meendleevs name here but most won't understand what the reason for that is If you don't like this academic leadership blame Australian voters and Captain Cook. I would rather the government in charge doing their job. You ou can't stand by like a professor might when young men are dying for democracy and Moscow missiles are slaughtering children are being slaughtered on a daily basis. The world may not be gong to survive long term anyway But it definitely won't with an English dude leading us out into the universe in the manner he currently is. Thus you are commended to start thinking about the weight of the centre of the earth you are on. That is where world peace can begin. If you agree that it is weightless, our descendants will probably be considering this planet to be the miracle that it is. What is meant by a true academic is someone who only believes what academia already says is the truth when it makes sense. Neither the way the tides or planetary motion made much sense the way they were taught. On a personal note, you can get sick of knowing Sir Isaac newton made mistakes. But anyway. That's my problem. Not yours. Hope to get as far as relative motions of gravity fields.

Well the people of the world are unlikely to believe that their moon can talk. Let alone about Sir Isaac newton's youth. But thank you. Thank you for being such a darling orbiter in these times of confusion of human purpose. Naturally if your words are truth we are eternally grateful to you for clarifying both of our high tides. ((⏱️=2000))Now Newton's law of gravity is his second law twice you say? That is very interesting. It may mean that professors at large need to do a bunch of fresh thought about all of the stuff their previous celestial beliefs have been cooking up for us as we go about our daily lives. Are you good to pay the bill for the truth? I love you dearly anyway

In conclusion the institutionalized belief that the moon gravity can mathematically extend to an ocean of the earth to explain the high tide under the moon is critically wrong. ((⏱️=800))Thus the tidal situation throughout the course of scholarship has not been excellent. ((⏱️=1500))At least that is the assessment of our closest celestial neighbor. ((⏱️=1500))Our physics professors need to get just a little more serious about the tides of the planet that they are all on. ((⏱️=1500))Then a proper civilized multi national tuning in with the rest of the universe may eventuate. ((⏱️=1500))You would suspect that would be the first step towards a trusting total nuclear disarming of all nations on the planet that you are looking at. ((⏱️=1500)) No matter and quite obviously governments do need to find funds for scholarship to decide upon a clear junior school teaching about the high tide on the side of the earth away from the moon. ((⏱️=800))Teachers need to agree on its reason. ((⏱️=1000))But pretty much whoever you are, why do you assess that one high tide is observed to rise against a direction of fall towards the moon?((⏱️=1500)) In an apparent twist of irony, it looms that its needed Newton third law solution is being obscured by a romantic olden day story about Newton seeing an apple fall. ((⏱️=500)) Will it be fries with that?

On my behalf what you have been teaching your school children for over three hundred years is every particle in the universe is attracting every other particle in the universe. ((⏱️=1500))There is a mass multiplication formula that follows these introductory words of my so called law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1500))That formula purports to be the scientific connector of that preliminary prose about every particle of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))The mass multiplication formula has its own problems of logic. ((⏱️=1500))The pity of the world is my introductory words are based on a direction of fall being perfectly continuous. Having the potential to be cast an indefinite distance from any particle of the universe ((⏱️=2000))On account of all directions of fall being mathematically and easily demonstratable as finite extensions from there source particle, I sincerely apologize to the world for casting a malignant spell over your education systems for the last three and a half centuries. ((⏱️=2000))Here is hoping that all your nations can break free of my original misunderstanding of the entire universe that we are all a part of.

The delegates were turning to look around the room. Could this great planet that they were leading ((⏱️=500))somehow have become hexed into a state of disrepair after Sir Isaac Newton said he understood the universe when he had not at all ? ((⏱️=1500))A little off beat Sir Isaac went on to explain that mathematics itself was not the truth. 1 + 1 equals 2 was a useful tool of civilization he said. But it could never be proven as an absolute truth. He based this analysis on 1 being a unique circumstance. 1 + 1 equals 2 required a duplication of that unique circumstance to carry the truth of numbers it was expected to carry was his point. In the end a duplication of the unique is the work of unsound minds he stated. ((⏱️=500)) So, fundamentally, mathematics and reality were not and could never be connected by absolute truth. He went on to say there was the subconscious tendency of mathematicians to treat zero and infinity as digits even though they knew this was errant. All they knew was numbers. So they did not know how else to treat them. ((⏱️=500))Boringly he persisted with the sub truth nature of mathematics until finally getting to the fact that an alternation of direction of fall along an axis that ran between adjacent particles meant it was not rationally possible for every particle in the universe to be attracting every other particle in the universe.

Before explaining the hoodwink of my mass multiplication formula to you, the foundational irrationality of gravity having a mutually attractive nature is here. ((⏱️=3000))I at the time and no one since has supplied a rationale of how a particular direction of fall survives or persists through the region in space where ay direction of fall is alternating. ((⏱️=2000))The premise of mutual gravitation is that this opposite direction penetration must be happening throughout the universe.((⏱️=2000))At this juncture we either have to explain to ourselves how the coexistence of all opposite directions of fall throughout the universe is mathematically and scientifically truthful. ((⏱️=800))Or, alternatively, simply accept that the moon's tidal analysis is where our understanding of gravity should be beginning. ((⏱️=1500))The tides of the earth are explained by the fact that opposite directions of fall do not coexist within each other is the moon's point of view.((⏱️=1500)) Obviously until all your school teachers and professors are teaching one coherent reason to your children to explain the second high tide, the possibility that they are teaching false hoods to explain the tides is very real and very detrimental to the future of life on earth.

Delegates nodded their heads in a manner that suggested they wanted to hear more. Sir Isaac began to recite words from his book, principia. He was here to admit that a principle of mutual endowment between all the masses of the universe was only ever a guess. He was to say if he had of managed to mathematically assess that the high tide under the moon was simply a lesser weighting towards the earth and absolutely not a weighting towards the moon he would not have made such a bad guess about the universe.

Lastly, if it universally appears, by experiments and astronomical observations, that all bodies about the earth gravitate towards the earth, and that in proportion to the quantity of matter which they severally contain, that the moon likewise, according to the quantity of its matter, gravitates towards the earth; that, on the other hand, our sea gravitates towards the moon; and all the planets mutually one towards another; and the comets in like manner towards the sun; we must, in consequence of this rule, universally allow that all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle of mutual gravitation.

These are my words from all those years ago and I can only try and set the record straight. Universal and mutual need a differentiating between. If used with reference to gravity, gravity is universal of mass. If there is a mass, that mass has a gravity field. As far as we know this is true. And of course a gravity field is an acceleration field with the acceleration being towards the mass. Mutual, when referring to gravity is a mistaken or unthought through step that has been added to universal gravity.

The premise is every mass has gravity. The following premise or theory is every mass in the universe is therefore attracting every other mass in the universe. ((⏱️=1500))This may sound like a perfect logic to a school child. Unfortunately it is far from such.

The story so far. The moon has explained the high tides afresh. The explanation is simple and understandable. Every professor and school teacher on earth knew they now had to get beyond teaching the tides through unclear sleight of hand interpretations from the past. Being as truthful as they could with their students was their exemplary goal. ((⏱️=1000))Currently the scene is shifting to the United Nations building in New York. After some tense negotiations, Sir Isaac Newton has signed an unrestricted come clean deal. The negotiations were with the future of humanity. An honorable agreement has been reached. Unconditionally no blame will be attached to Sir Isaac forever. Now, above the general assembly his fully materialized torso would appear. He would explain why he had impulsively multiplied masses together in a law of gravity that had only become sensible when it was broken back down to an original and truthful insight. This was the point of his reluctant return to earth. When he heard the thunderous applause as he appeared, his somber mood of conscience changed and he considered displaying his genius once again and explaining the reason of the universe was going to be the finite and infinitely inexact relationship between the circumference and the diameter of a circle. Instead he stuck to his task of troubled conscience and began his address as the applause began to die down.
Representatives of the many exalted nations of the earth. [[break=1000]]Thankyou. [[break=1500]]As you know I died a genius in seventeen twenty seven. [[break=1000]] Almost three hundred years ago. [[break=1000]]The appearance of my torso now should tell you that life beyond the body is at least half true. [[break=2000]]You may ask would such survival after death be the full truth?[[break=1500]] Well of course it is. [[break=1500]]Embarrassingly, my pants are not on. In my haste to get here, I forgot them. [[break=1500]]
The United Nations assembly was taken back by this. In their view of the universe, no dead personage would do a disorganized earthly return. [[break=1000]] Could this be a vaudeville act? Among the murmurs of disbelief, an undeterred Sir Isaac was to go on. ((⏱️=1500))By his own account a little disrobed but , as they were to find out, his talk was fully clothed in a love of days gone bye.

It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The apples were falling, the birds were singing. Every day of the week, I was putting pants on. Our academy, the Royal Society, became aware of what you know of as the inverse square law of diminishing acceleration towards the celestial bodies of the universe. We did through an analysis of Kepler's third law of planetary motion.Yes. It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The apples were falling, the birds were singing. Pants were being put on by one and all. Our academy, the Royal Society, became aware of what you know of as the inverse square law of diminishing acceleration towards the celestial bodies of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))This awareness was developed through an analysis of Kepler's third law of planetary motion. ((⏱️=800))This law was an absolute beauty. Except it should have been presented like this. To explain the inverse square law to you

Sir Isaac became long windead and unnecessarily esoteric at this stage. In short he explained the way Kepler had presented his third law was through orbital time multiplied by its self and distance from the sun cubed. Distance cubed was understandable as a volume. Time squared was meaningless. [[break=1000]]Even though velocity multiplied by velocity was also not of meaning, when the law of planetary motion was presented like it was here, the relative velocity of a planet was easily mathematically detectable as a consequence of the magnitude of the curved surface area around the sun at that planet's distance from the sun.((⏱️=1000)) We pick Sir Isaac up again as he gets to the actual inverse square law.
This animation shows the curved surface area around a celestial mass in a manner that increases as the mass is moved away from. ((⏱️=1500))As the arrows towards the celestial mass indicate, in direct proportion the rate of acceleration towards the celestial mass is decreasing with the curved surface area increase around the celestial mass. ((⏱️=1500))That is the inverse square law of acceleration rate diminish that we derived from Kepler's third law of planetary motion all those years ago. ((⏱️=1500)) If the nations of the earth wish to understand what I began referring to as gravity, this is where you begin. We know the acceleration is towards the mass. Consideration needs to be given to the force that causes that acceleration being in the opposite direction to the actual acceleration.

This animation shows the curved surface area around a celestial mass in an increasing manner. [[break=1500]]As the arrows towards the celestial mass indicate, in direct proportion the rate of acceleration towards the celestial mass is decreasing with the area increase. [[break=1500]]That is the inverse square law of acceleration rate diminish that we derived from Kepler's third law of planetary motion all those years ago. [[break=1500]] If the nations of the earth wish to understand what I began referring to as gravity, this is where you begin. We know the acceleration is towards the mass. Consideration needs to be given to the force that causes that acceleration being in the opposite direction to the actual acceleration

Sir Isaac's statement about the force being in the opposite direction to the acceleration caused a ripple of murmurs to work it's way around the building. The delegates were all aware of the curious diagram that the moon had presented in an earlier video. This diagram had what were presumably force arrows pointing away from the earth. The arrows pointed through particulate space that fitted with an inverse square law design around the earth.((⏱️=2000))

As the murmurs subsided, Sir Isaac was seen looking at his phone. He had been hoping for a message from a Manhattan tailor about a new set of breeches. Instead the message was from the moon. It contained encouragement to hurry up. According to the moon, the next generation of school children was waiting for and in great need of what his mistake was secluding from them. Evidently the moon was sure there was a direct relationship between the turn rates of gravity fields and the turn rates or day lengths of the celestial body within that gravity field. ((⏱️=1500))Amidst the tensions between Nations, if this was true it would indeed be something new and intellectually helpful for the next generation of school children to be growing into and texting each other about as they took the world over from previous generations. ((⏱️=1500))For now, getting a text from the moon was reminding Sir Isaac that it was a moon shot calculation that made his law of gravity a mathematical impossibility at first base.

In brief the reason I multiplied masses together was this. In an inappropriate use of my second law twice I confused an acceleration and the cause of that acceleration. ((⏱️=2000))I will get back to that matter later. ((⏱️=2000))Relative to the earth, the same face of the moon is always towards the earth. According to the moon, the reason for this is the moon's rotation is locked to the rotation of its gravity field. ((⏱️=1500))Now, I have just received a message from the moon saying the uncovering of my mass multiplication mistake is going to cause an academic revolution here on earth. That revolution will need an anchor point. You have one waiting in the wings. Similar to the Kepler third law relative velocity table becoming the anchor point of what we call the Copernican academic revolution, the rotation rate table that the telescope has developed is the clear light on the other side of my mistake. ((⏱️=1500))What this means is you have prima facie evidence of the rotation rates of gravity fields being the key to the rotation rates of the planets. And also of a connection between the rotation rates of adjacent planets. ((⏱️=1500))Of course prima facie evidence is not proof. But it does give your academics direction to achieve an understanding of why there is twenty four hours in an earth day as they set about casting aside my mass multiplication mistake for the future good of the world.

Thanks to the telescope, the rotation rate table had become more and more accurate over the past one hundred years. The problem was the telescope didn't have a human personality.((⏱️=1000)) By and large telescope operators were government employees.((⏱️=1000)) Their state of consciousness was at a lower level than what the universe required. That is if its reason was going to be unfurled here on planet earth. Sir Isaac went on.

No sirens went off. The building emptied in under three minutes. Everyone present knew that high society sensibility was about to explode. The force couldn't possibly be in the opposite direction to the falling apple of their education systems.[[break=3000]] Around half an hour later it was understood that high society sensibilities had not exploded after all. [[break=1000]] As the members began filing back in, they saw Sir Isaac was gazing quizzically at the latest iPhone. [[break=1000]] His intention was to ring around Manhattan for a store that sold his style of breeches. ((⏱️=1500))As the members settled back down, he put this task to one side and moved his discourse into what he was to call the true law of gravity..

If you haven't heard, it was the best of times. It was the worst of times. The sun was shining, The birds were singing. Apples were falling. ((⏱️=1500))Yes there is a rate of acceleration towards a celestial mass. And that acceleration diminishes in accordance with the so described inverse square law. We, the Royal Society, proposed that the cause of that acceleration was the celestial mass its self. ((⏱️=2000))Modern humility prevents me from saying who of our academy first proposed that the rate of acceleration towards a celestial mass was directly proportional to the magnitude of the mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the centre of the mass that the acceleration was happening. ((⏱️=2000))Whether several caveats or provisos, that is the true law of gravity of the universe. ((⏱️=1500))I can only apologize for attempting to develop that truth into a false law of mutual gravitation from there.

The first proviso Sir Isaac spoke of, [[break=800]] the moon had already given a gold mine explanation to in a previous video. [[break=1000]]The rate of acceleration towards the centre of the earth is measured to be decreasing beneath the surface of the earth. [[break=1000]]As it should be according to standard mathematical reasoning. [[break=1000]]So this true law of gravity that Sir Isaac was highlighting in contrast to his mistaken mutual one was not true at all beneath the surface of the earth or the surface of any other celestial body. [[break=2000]]The other proviso was the rate of acceleration above the surface of a celestial body was never precise from the perspective of a falling body. This was because the rate of acceleration was increasing the further the body fell. [[break=1500]] With those provisos mentioned, Sir Isaac explained that this law of gravity was the law that carried what we know as the universal gravity constant. ((⏱️=1500))In what we were teaching as Cavendish experiments, the small masses were only used to measure an acceleration towards a larger mass. The actual magnitude of the smaller mass was irrelevant to the derivation of the constant. ((⏱️=2000))Now, in what seemed to be an irrelevancy to the topic at hand, Sir Isaac went on to explain what his second law is

If you were able to avoid the bubonic plague, of course it was the best of times. Unfortunately, the original abuser of Newton’s second law was an outstanding mathematical genius. In its purest form, my second law simply says the rate of acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the magnitude of the force causing the acceleration and inversely proportional to the mass magnitude being accelerated.