|
|
|
speculation
Before the microscope and the telescope, the idea of a supreme creator was interesting.
In more modern times the counter idea of equations creating a bang and hence the atomic structure emerged.
Currently there is a mistake in basic reasoning about what the fourth dimension is....
In more modern times the counter idea of equations creating a bang and hence the atomic structure emerged.
Currently there is a mistake in basic reasoning about what the fourth dimension is....
One infinite linear dimension is a theoretical distance that does not have a beginning or end.
Geometry begins with one infinite linear dimension not existing in isolation from two other infinite linear dimensions at a right angle to itself. Meaning, for these reasons, infinite space is an impossibility.
1/ Any distance that is part of the whole is finite .
2/ Any distance comprised of sections is also finite.
Geometry thus renders the religious question of how something can come from nothing a non question. Length, width and breadth is not nothing. It's a complexity of three dimensional particles.
The three alternatives are.....
1/ Space expanding towards an infinite size.
2/ Space has finished its expansion towards an infinite size and now exists at an exact finite size.
3/ Some order of a contraction of space.
3/ is not likely to be a genuine possibility.
This does not explain how or why the atomic structure has been generated out of a self limiting three dimensions. But it does allow space and particles to be known as one and the same. And is a step towards seeing solar system inverse square laws as galactic journey particles made of infinitesimal space particles.
1/ Space expanding towards an infinite size.
2/ Space has finished its expansion towards an infinite size and now exists at an exact finite size.
3/ Some order of a contraction of space.
3/ is not likely to be a genuine possibility.
This does not explain how or why the atomic structure has been generated out of a self limiting three dimensions. But it does allow space and particles to be known as one and the same. And is a step towards seeing solar system inverse square laws as galactic journey particles made of infinitesimal space particles.
The only question for religious devotees, mathematicians and others to address is the one of whether or not infinite three dimensional space is possible. If the answer is in the negative, the decision is between 1/, 2/, and 3/.
The gist of Einstein's space time mistake is time is not what makes a clock function.
A clock on earth running slow is caused by clock malfunction. Not a slowing of time. What Einstein's time dilation means is clocks in different physical environments have altered run rates. That's the equivalent of something being up with a clock on earth when it is running slow or fast.
The Einsteinian confusion is (apparently) assessing the cause of ageing to be time.
1/ Time is an agreed method of counting and causes nothing except the odd stupid mathematical physics theory.
2/ Ageing is caused by wear and tear. Forces. Not a unilateral method of counting.
The personal opinion of Einstein's theories is they are an ill conceived fermentation.
Life After Death?
A Pi explanation does not necessarily mean that we do not have a soul that survives our bodies. Night time dreams do not seem to occur on atomic matter. The answer to our soul maybe found in the reason a chromosome divides. A force system born out of chromosomes being perfect electronic configurations unable to eject an electron causes an over excited central oxygen atom to absorb its nucleus is what pushes a chromosome apart? etc if right. Whatever dreams witnessed while sleeping would be the doorway into knowledge about any life after mortality.
As in most cultures, death could be a door out into something that approximates eternal life. Someone like Jesus could exist in an afterlife as a shining image. His father, though, would be the calculation of Pi.
Cross Gender Evolution
Charles Darwin's survival of the fittest decree does not explain variation within a species. Fitter variations surviving where weaker variations perish does not explain why variations have come to be in the first place.
Variation within the human species as it stands is visibly caused by cross gender impact. That is a daughter is a variation of her mother caused by the impact of her father running through her mother. Vica versa for a son. Asexual cause of variation not so obvious from the outside. Examples of cross gender induced variations.
If chromosomes divide, must there be a force that pushes them apart? While we continue to breed, we are evolving somewhere or other. Plausibly to the completion of the human species. It could be suspected that the role of DNA is to do with the timing of a chromosome division, that cancer is the wrong chromosome dividing first, except for cells unique to the more elongated male of the species, that X chromosomes in the human cell divide first, (two divisions beginning a new cell (female) give a more rounded shape relative to one doing so (male)) etc if right... the life after human mortality question would be are we part of the fabric of the earth's inverse square law when we dream......or are we out of the three dimensions as we know them when we drift into a land of nod.............the opposite sex in asexual evolution, pollination plus whatever, etc if right....
If chromosomes divide, must there be a force that pushes them apart? While we continue to breed, we are evolving somewhere or other. Plausibly to the completion of the human species. It could be suspected that the role of DNA is to do with the timing of a chromosome division, that cancer is the wrong chromosome dividing first, except for cells unique to the more elongated male of the species, that X chromosomes in the human cell divide first, (two divisions beginning a new cell (female) give a more rounded shape relative to one doing so (male)) etc if right... the life after human mortality question would be are we part of the fabric of the earth's inverse square law when we dream......or are we out of the three dimensions as we know them when we drift into a land of nod.............the opposite sex in asexual evolution, pollination plus whatever, etc if right....
Sun In Motion Diagrams
Finding the answer to this diagram is something that should be of interest to everybody. The green earth vector represents a perpetual nigh straight line 0.512 km/sec/day speed change relative to the presumed uniform motion of the sun.
Unless calculations show otherwise, the moon's inverse square law has already left the earth's inverse square law.
Understanding the moon's galactic motion would be as important as getting a flag to the moon. The interest is which side the moon eventually departs. Will it become an inner planet like Venus and Mercury? Or a faster turning outer one like Mars and the earth? And what happens to adjacent planet pairs when it does?
Greenhouse
The clue to the mistake in current greenhouse calculations is cooling is immediate when a cloud passes over. When that happens the sun rays have been blocked from reaching the earth's surface. The immediate slowing of molecular movement beneath a passing cloud is a result of a (sudden) lack of incoming solar radiation. Not the immediate surge of outgoing terrestrial radiation that current greenhouse calculations are based upon.
1/ Joseph Fourier greenhouse logic is right and wrong.
An increase in terrestrial infrared radiation absorbed on the way from earth to space causes extra kinetic energy within the earth's atmosphere (causes a hotter lower atmosphere). That is the right part.
The impasse Fourier advocates face is the emission of terrestrial radiation is not observed to slow down molecular movement. Molecular absorption of incoming ultraviolet radiation is observed to simultaneously increase both infrared radiation and molecular movement. Current greenhouse calculations are based on the emission of infrared radiation being the reducer of molecular movement on earth (after it has arrived, the remover of the sun's energy from the earth).
2/ The way the atmosphere loses internal kinetic energy is work done against the earth's inverse square law.
For a rotating planet like the earth, this is observable with the atmosphere shrinking at night without the energy causing the expansion during the day appearing in another form as the cooling occurs.
With respect of the axiom about energy being immutable, the axiom has no detailed articulated account of potential energy. (the flag on the moon lost 5/6th of its potential energy between blast off from earth and being planted on the moon. Without a planned return trip, that lost limbo energy is unaccounted for.)
3/ Helium sinks in hydrogen. Indicates fusion leading to fission inside a star.
Stars burning out through emission of ultra violet light, they would not be expected to. The expectation would be radiation is the passage of an electron through space converting space into radiated particles as the electron advances. The expected birth point of the energy we receive on earth from the sun is about eight minutes ago. Fourier's mistake was presuming that the first law of thermodynamics applies to radiant energy.
1/ Joseph Fourier greenhouse logic is right and wrong.
An increase in terrestrial infrared radiation absorbed on the way from earth to space causes extra kinetic energy within the earth's atmosphere (causes a hotter lower atmosphere). That is the right part.
The impasse Fourier advocates face is the emission of terrestrial radiation is not observed to slow down molecular movement. Molecular absorption of incoming ultraviolet radiation is observed to simultaneously increase both infrared radiation and molecular movement. Current greenhouse calculations are based on the emission of infrared radiation being the reducer of molecular movement on earth (after it has arrived, the remover of the sun's energy from the earth).
2/ The way the atmosphere loses internal kinetic energy is work done against the earth's inverse square law.
For a rotating planet like the earth, this is observable with the atmosphere shrinking at night without the energy causing the expansion during the day appearing in another form as the cooling occurs.
With respect of the axiom about energy being immutable, the axiom has no detailed articulated account of potential energy. (the flag on the moon lost 5/6th of its potential energy between blast off from earth and being planted on the moon. Without a planned return trip, that lost limbo energy is unaccounted for.)
3/ Helium sinks in hydrogen. Indicates fusion leading to fission inside a star.
Stars burning out through emission of ultra violet light, they would not be expected to. The expectation would be radiation is the passage of an electron through space converting space into radiated particles as the electron advances. The expected birth point of the energy we receive on earth from the sun is about eight minutes ago. Fourier's mistake was presuming that the first law of thermodynamics applies to radiant energy.