****week 32 celestial advice for earth mathematicians
The example Martian was puffing hard during that climb. But, being only an example, he was able to do a pose when asked to by the guide. The Martain specimen had decided to see some Indonesia on the way to South Africa. The left Martian thong was to break in Namibia but that's another story that can get told on some other planet. The visit to the Sunda Strait was to do with your world war. But Martians like being in places on your planet where there is actually another country directly beneath. Except for Christmas Island, this Australia place is all North Atlantic Ocean directly below.
So, hopefully, the unhelpful earth smog of Sir Isaac can clear from your earth's semi diurnal tidal system.
Post universal gravitation, the earth thing to do would be to determine sizes of the inverse square laws of the solar system. Get onto their changing shapes as they move around the galaxy within the sun's inverse square law.
Coming directly from Mars to your neighbouring 24 hour a day planet, that's the take it or leave it celestial advice. Remembering that you can never get the locations exact, to find where a minor inverse square law ends and the major one begins, you find the equal and equal points on the far side of the minor inverse square law.
How the moon can be outside your earth's inverse square law but accelerating and decelerating as if it is within both the sun and earth inverse square laws is a mystery. If universal gravitation falls by the wayside and that mystery settles into place, earth professors have plenty to do.
When the moon was still in the earth's inverse square law, the earth-moon push system must have been well established and is still continuing in accordance with what it was when slipping out of the earth's inverse square law. It is gradually losing momentum relative to your earth but why the loss is still in accordance with the inverse square of distance from earth, moving inverse square law earth professors will work out. Probably does make sense until the moon leaves your earth but still seems a mystery.
From relative motions, the real speed of the sun maybe determinable. Ignoring the ellipses and in two dimensions, this gives interesting results. Then it may be determinable whether or not the earth is behind or in front of the sun at a given point of time. Without question, if our sun is moving, it is going to have a bow and a stern. Whether or not they are determinable is the question. If they are, then whether your moon is currently behind or in front of your earth would come next. And then a determination of when your moon is likely to leave the earth could begin. The interest will be whether or not it goes our side or Venus side. At this stage, the sun's inverse square law can't be uniquely established between the earth and the moon. You have to go to a few more decimal places to split the earth and sun inverse square law magnitudes.
All topics for new thinking if universal gravitation and fixed inverse square law physics get untangled from Aristotle's ideas. Personally would like to be forgetting the need to get all this to your world. Then your planet could be simply enjoyed right up until the count down to deportation. Importantly, your professors hopefully will find ways to stop teaching fixed sun planetary motion explanations. After all, an earth professor with a good human conscience is just an honest woman or man with an earth university degree. Might take a hundred years but it'll work out here.
So, hopefully, the unhelpful earth smog of Sir Isaac can clear from your earth's semi diurnal tidal system.
Post universal gravitation, the earth thing to do would be to determine sizes of the inverse square laws of the solar system. Get onto their changing shapes as they move around the galaxy within the sun's inverse square law.
Coming directly from Mars to your neighbouring 24 hour a day planet, that's the take it or leave it celestial advice. Remembering that you can never get the locations exact, to find where a minor inverse square law ends and the major one begins, you find the equal and equal points on the far side of the minor inverse square law.
How the moon can be outside your earth's inverse square law but accelerating and decelerating as if it is within both the sun and earth inverse square laws is a mystery. If universal gravitation falls by the wayside and that mystery settles into place, earth professors have plenty to do.
When the moon was still in the earth's inverse square law, the earth-moon push system must have been well established and is still continuing in accordance with what it was when slipping out of the earth's inverse square law. It is gradually losing momentum relative to your earth but why the loss is still in accordance with the inverse square of distance from earth, moving inverse square law earth professors will work out. Probably does make sense until the moon leaves your earth but still seems a mystery.
From relative motions, the real speed of the sun maybe determinable. Ignoring the ellipses and in two dimensions, this gives interesting results. Then it may be determinable whether or not the earth is behind or in front of the sun at a given point of time. Without question, if our sun is moving, it is going to have a bow and a stern. Whether or not they are determinable is the question. If they are, then whether your moon is currently behind or in front of your earth would come next. And then a determination of when your moon is likely to leave the earth could begin. The interest will be whether or not it goes our side or Venus side. At this stage, the sun's inverse square law can't be uniquely established between the earth and the moon. You have to go to a few more decimal places to split the earth and sun inverse square law magnitudes.
All topics for new thinking if universal gravitation and fixed inverse square law physics get untangled from Aristotle's ideas. Personally would like to be forgetting the need to get all this to your world. Then your planet could be simply enjoyed right up until the count down to deportation. Importantly, your professors hopefully will find ways to stop teaching fixed sun planetary motion explanations. After all, an earth professor with a good human conscience is just an honest woman or man with an earth university degree. Might take a hundred years but it'll work out here.
When the earth and moon galactic speed changes are animated together, it's hard to find other explanation than a system of pushes between them. That is, their relationship is not reasonably explained without them being held apart. Personally can't look at your moon at night and think otherwise. Or, if you aren't trying to add the motion of your earth when you look at this moon of yours, you aren't doing it right yet. Perhaps you need two moons to look at like back home on back home.