COPERNICAN MISTAKES
  • introduction
  • introductionui
  • one way descent
  • Newton
  • 'orbital' motion
  • undoing inertia
  • balloon squeeze tides
  • Newtonian tides
  • Kepler's second law/rotation rates
  • speculation
  • backwards calendar
university people dishonest
​mistake about the universe every particle in the universe
institutional first world fib
opposite directions
prof

​
don't smash the subscribe bottom like
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
the sin moves 
the hard task of saying every professor is wrong.
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
​desire 
possibly would have been to explain the mistake in universal gravitation first. decision was made to first give a pointer to what the copernican revolution as it stands is hiding.


anticipate success.  morality of professors  and intelligence of politicians newtons word rule 1
motion of galaxy solar systm pendulm
smaller gravity field contained within a larger one. space is particulate
venus mercury stars slow down
moon speed changes
calculated the speed of the sun
gravity field s in motion at speeds superior to speeds caused by descent. 
tides
​english democracy
pi
​speech impediment more video

​
dedication
genesis
right answers  descent a relative motion animations   newtons third law
professors politicians
how the world feels about its self
should be enough there.  duty bound if you say the copernican revolution
whether or not dealing with the emotions of the world felt like it
method of calculating the speed of the sun relative to the centre of the galaxy
stars slow down as they aproach galactic arms 
60 km/sec  can't see how the earths inverse square law supplies the moon with its galactic speed change
moon go one side or the other.
​reason the universe.
celestial announcement Aristarchus respect for good scholars
doorway into newton's mistake and understanding the tides same thing
newton third law
​dark matter.
​
f someone else is doing this best. apple attracting the earth
​
his law of gravity clever alternation of direction of fall mistake 
true law of gravity a prop to m/d2 
constant  cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed
second law
second law twice
​F = Gm(M/d2)  M(m/d2)
​mutual umiversal 
​like earth fixed in the centre of the universe
in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration
​10 kilos of mass
​

introduction
​

creation of mass
Picture
creation of mass
Law of acceleration (Newton's second law)  The rate of acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the force causing the acceleration and inversely proportional to the massiveness of the body.

First Newton first law correction note. Within an accelerated mass there is an inspired internal weighting acting in the opposite direction to the acceleration. This is where the force that caused the acceleration dissipates.  The Galilean/Newtonian mistake was assessing that this oppositely directed weighting is born in or inherent of mass.  It does not exist in any form prior to a force that causes the acceleration.
​
Second Newton first law correction note. The conservation of the momentum of a free travelling body and uniform motion are one and the same.

Law of acceleration weight note. Weight is the potential acceleration or potential relative acceleration of mass.

​Force Law (Newton's third law) To every force there is an equal and opposite force.

nfl false correction of aristotle
correct correction momentum and ntl
newtons second law to measure weight
inertia horizonta plane weight
one type of mass
rolling ball
weightlessness
​prove that history is correct with its invention of two types of mass
scalar quantity vector mass
momentum not inertia
continuation of newton's third law not his first explains a résistance to a change of of motion
newton's second law to measure weight
jerrys anumations
inertial mass gravitational mass
weightlessness
stationary/rolling ball
einsteins rocket
​newton rule 1
problem false correction Aristotle motion force
correct answer momentum. if addition a truth conservation of momentum
tied in with a resistance to a change of uniform motion
Newtons second law problem   balls car
two types of mass
equivalent einstein called this a law
measurement of mass types. 
weighlessness
scalar quantity science decide how many types of mass there are
stationary ball no horistontal force
particles of a rolling ball follow a the rhthym of a penulum
some of momentum parts being conserved up causes the dowm etc
einsteins rocket implies that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same thing
newtons first rule of resoning law of gravity next motive






summary   
ristance to change of motion does not exist prior to the force that causes the change
the conservation of momentum is aritjmetically explained
​
gravity aside, two problems with Newtonian physics.
The first is the idea that a resistance to a change of a state of momentum is inherent of matter. 
Resistance to momentum change does not exist prior to the force that causes the change. 
other problem is a lack of reasoning or statement about why momentum is conserved.
Colliding bodies conservation underlying truth free travelling body. 
​ball rolling across the table demonstration of the conservation of momentum

rocket/elevator
aristotole
momentum conservation is momentum conserved by inertial mass or through definition
momentum preceded copernican revolution
mass is a scalar quantity surreptitious
why the ball is stationary 
why a ball rolls weight transfer across a centre
is the ball rolling because its momentum is being conserved
weightless during descent reflection that we use the inverse square law to measure mass when it is resting on the earth's surface
different masses fall at the same rate
​mass is a scalar quantity  motive

To a certain extent planetary motion and satellitic suspension is academic. what does it matter in the main we live our lives as if the earth was fixed in space as the ancients believe and knowledge of the motion of the earth does not greatly change that.  Untruth about the tides though are a little more impactful.  Will address existing ideas about the far side high tide later.  The first on to undertsnad in the one under the moon.  It is a simple mathematical reasoning  that any school kid should be able to follow and the make a judgement about. It doesnt begin  vastly different to the Newtonian approach. The moon;s inverse square law acts is in one direction.  The earth's inverse square law acts in the opposite direction.  Tou had the two together and if you have a high  tide. Where it changes and the new direction commences is this is seen as having a right angled relative impact on the earth's  
Picture
if someone else is doing this best. apple attracting the earth
​
his law of gravity clever alternation of direction of fall mistake 
true law of gravity a prop to m/d2 
constant  cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed
second law
second law twice
​F = Gm(M/d2)  M(m/d2)
​mutual umiversal 
​like earth fixed in the centre of the universe
in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration
​10 kilos of mass

Picture
super throne ego
base problem  smaller mass does bigger
True law of gravity a = m/d2 consnt of that. cavenish experiment
newton's second law


Picture
peer review covid  Mass existing in two forms needs a solid peer review.
each mass measured through second law diagram
gravitational mass.  Newton did not know.  every particle mistake, vector away
inertial mass history born out of aristotle.  
​
mass is a scalar quantity
stationary ball.  absence of external force and or plus inertia
Newton's first rule of reasoning
weightless during descent because mass is weightless
all things fall at the same rate because mass is weightless



​
off shoot of mass = why ball does not roll
​
fair go motive mathematical physics not giving the world a fair go
​einstein ball stationary in the horizontal plane because of its quantity. non einstein ball stationary in the h p because of the absence of an external force in the h p..
Einstein  ball continues rolling because of its quantity.  non einstein continues rolling because of a a formual of mathematicla physics  That formula being mometum.  m x v 
Einstein a resistance to increased or decreased velocity in the h p is inherent of the ball at all times.  Non einstein reistance is the equal and opposite reaction to the foce causing the change and manifests as a measurable weight direct in the opposite to change of motion.  The important non einstein point is the resistance is not inherent of matter.  It does not exist prior to the force that is causing the change.
whatever weight is in the einstein world, in the non einstein world is the potential acceleration of mass.
In the einstein world every mass consists of  two types of mass.  One type of mass within mass is gravitational mass. That type of mass is what causes mass to attact all other masses and be attracted by all other masses.  The other type of mass that mass consists of is inertial mass. Inertial mass is the mass type that makes all those motion attributes be.
In non einstin world there is only the mass type of mass. In the non einstein world, even though it knows the differenc, the einstein world is confusing weight and mass.  This is done when attibute what we call gravity and motion to mass.  Gravity may be a correct attrbute of mass.  But placing the adjective of gravitational in front of mass does explain how mass causes gravity. deal with that in ugravitat.  


​
uniform motion is the conservation of free momentum.   What is regarded as inertial mass causing  resistance to acceleration is accelerated mass instantaneously weighted within in the opposite direction to that acceleration. Not inherent.
Weight, whether due to an absence of descent in an inverse square law or due to an instantaneous resistance to acceleration, is the potential acceleration of mass.
That weightlessness during descent and the reason all quantiles of mass descend at the same rate is due to fact that mass is weightless.  
​mass is a scalar quantity
mathematical ps get scientific. not so mathematical. universe never be solved thru equations.
uniform motion = 

scalar quantite and vector quantities
mass scalar becomes a vector through adjectives.
a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force
first part is the conservation of momentum  not negotaiable greatest motion 
​resistance is weighting of mass  in the opposite direction to an acceleration

A little reflection will show that the law of the equality of the inertial and gravitational mass is equivalent to the assertion that the acceleration imparted to a body by a gravitational field is independent of the nature of the body. For Newton's equation of motion in a gravitational field, written out in full, it is:
(Inertial mass) . (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) . (Gravitational mass).It is only when there is numerical equality between the inertial and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body.
Picture
prepared to be bored.  The maintenance of the foundation of Einsteins theories requires a simple demonstration that weightless mass also exists as inertial mass and gravitational mass. 

Our only
The first step to writing physics is stating that mass is a scalar quantity. 
A scalar quantity is a quantity measured by its magnitude.  In contrast a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be quantified. 
The history of a differentiation between vector and scalar quantities seems to predate the Copernican revolution. Possibly can be traced back to the B.C period. 
If scholarship had an intellectual rigour about the difference, we would not have lived through either of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.
mass is a scalar

galileos mistake family etc
​satellites
calculate size of inverse square law
​animations  
1/ planet future
2/ rotation rates Einstein not get there
3/ previous animation other animations no beef with Einstein
4/ predictions corruptions Neptune light bending
​mass scalar only the mass type of mass
5/ Aristotle obsession with motion buriand 
6/ Newton's first law misunderstands both motion and a resistance to a change of motion
7/ Measuring mass is done through newtons second law.  0/0
8/ define weight.  
​9/ only one kind of mass
10/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law.  2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that resistance  is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration.  4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
​12/ first newton's law gravity
0/ planet future
1/ rotation rates einstein not get there

2/ previous animation other animations no beef with einstien
3/ predictions corruptions neptune light bending
4/   how many types of mass can be mass be vector no no measuring each
5/ newton's law first is two laws strngth from galileos descrp of planetary motion
6/ weight is potential momentum  
7/ resistance to a change of motion not inherent  0/0
8/ inertia is a weighting of mass in the opp direction to accel 
9/ rolling ball
10/ mass in weightless
11 aristotle. newtons philoso[hy 
12/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law.  2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that inertia is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration.  4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
​13/ first newton's law ogravity

census?
animation
two types of mass come on weak minded
being dependent on acceleration to measure inertial mass leaves the concept of inertial mass maintaining uniform motion to be an unknown. means resistance to a change of motion originates with the force causing the change 
each is measured calibrated by the inverses square standard mass
newton's first law of motion law of inertia     weight is potential momentum
predictions
​rotation rates
newton's law of gravity
Picture
lifting force required newton's cannon ball satellites society

descent is a relative motion   ignoring 2 metre  0.6 second 20 km relative to sun
​apple story
​

Galleo Einstein Newton
historically the law of inertia
defining inertial mass through 2nd law is a contradiction of terms 
does motion perservere as a mathematical fact or because of an untraceable property of matter
define weight.  weight is relative to a chosen stanadrd   that is 50 to 100
inertial mass measuring the equal and opposite acceleration to a weight. that is using the known rate of acceleration due to an inverse square law to measure the weight of one object relative to another.
principle of equivalence.  gravitational mass using 2nd law to measure weight.  thus when same object is measures as gravitational mass and then inertial mass it means that the mass of the object has not altered between measurements and general relativity is just a complex way of saying 1 = 1
Resistance to a change of motion is a weighting of a mass in the opposite direction to the force causing the change.  Neither the reistance or the change causing force exist proior to the existence of the other.
Descent in an inverse square law. ristance in the inverse square law

 We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.
a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.
​inertial mass is mass etc
​essentially correcting aristotle
uniform motion is explained through aritmetic not physics.
 contradictions       only the mass type of mass.
why objects fall at same rate 
resistance to change of motion 
why a wheel rolls
definition of weight
principle of equivalencea property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55SaeTvXT8

all measurements of mass are a calibration against an acceleration rate.
Picture
Picture
This is just stupid.  This is embarrassing.  
if you don't believe that every particle in the universe is attracting every other particle in the universe, there is a not lot more to add.  The second high tide being explained as the equal and opposite reaction across the centre of the earth and not through either a rotation around a joint earth moon centre of gravity inside the earth or a reduction in lunar inverse square law magnitude across the diameter of the earth or some combination of the two is the message of intent.  Has burnt inside for over thrirty years by now.  Coupled with the earth falling towards a moving point and not from its own motion towards a fixed point, that is basic information everyone should have.

There is to add a few things that are less definite but more significant if right.  They are the probability that there is direct relationship between inverse square law rotation rate.  That probabilty would be staring the plaent in the face is it wasn't for two laws of physics that simply shouldbnt be in the school books The first of those laws in Newtons laws of gravity.  
​
We all look and sound like we do I guess. This is 2021. The first photo say 1967. The second definitely 1971.  Between the two photos something scholastically unusal had happened. Physics classes were left in disbelief.  The teacher of the time was delivering untenable explanations of both the tides of the earth and the motions of the planets around the sun. So, if you can bear with what some one looks and sounds like, the world may be able to move from fixed sun to moving sun scholarship.  And just as importantly move on from a harebrained concept about every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.  

Satellites. The earth is round.  Us adults believe satellites orbit the earth because the earth is round.  This allows a satellite to beat the earth's gravity. To be believing and teaching something as quaint as this we also say it is ultra important to know where a satellite would go if the earth's gravity field could be turned off.
Reasonably obviously the correct answer to the suspension and orbit of a satellite is the earth and its gravity field move at a speed much greater than a speed achieved during a descent.  When we get to know this we don't or won't have say and teach that roundness of the earth is beating the earth's gravity for an orbiting stellite and schoolteachers we also be able to leave the earth's gravity field turned on at all times..
The world got its understanding of gravity and satellites messed up by a man named Sir Isaac Newton. At this later hour it is in our best interests to sort out the mistakes that Sir Isaac has bequeathed us.. 

the circle

​
the story so far
  • introduction
  • introductionui
  • one way descent
  • Newton
  • 'orbital' motion
  • undoing inertia
  • balloon squeeze tides
  • Newtonian tides
  • Kepler's second law/rotation rates
  • speculation
  • backwards calendar