**introduction**

motivation apple no

true law of gravity a prop to m/d2

constant cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed

second law

second law twice

in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration

10 kilos of mass

true law of gravity a prop to m/d2

constant cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed

second law

second law twice

in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration

10 kilos of mass

super throne ego

base problem smaller mass does bigger

True law of gravity a = m/d2 consnt of that. cavenish experiment

newton's second law

base problem smaller mass does bigger

True law of gravity a = m/d2 consnt of that. cavenish experiment

newton's second law

peer review covid Mass existing in two forms needs a solid peer review.

each mass measured through second law diagram

gravitational mass. Newton did not know. every particle mistake, vector away

inertial mass history born out of aristotle.

mass is a scalar quantity

stationary ball. absence of external force and or plus inertia

Newton's first rule of reasoning

weightless during descent because mass is weightless

all things fall at the same rate because mass is weightless

off shoot of mass = why ball does not roll

fair go motive mathematical physics not giving the world a fair go

einstein ball stationary in the horizontal plane because of its quantity. non einstein ball stationary in the h p because of the absence of an external force in the h p..

Einstein ball continues rolling because of its quantity. non einstein continues rolling because of a a formual of mathematicla physics That formula being mometum. m x v

Einstein a resistance to increased or decreased velocity in the h p is inherent of the ball at all times. Non einstein reistance is the equal and opposite reaction to the foce causing the change and manifests as a measurable weight direct in the opposite to change of motion. The important non einstein point is the resistance is not inherent of matter. It does not exist prior to the force that is causing the change.

whatever weight is in the einstein world, in the non einstein world is the potential acceleration of mass.

In the einstein world every mass consists of two types of mass. One type of mass within mass is gravitational mass. That type of mass is what causes mass to attact all other masses and be attracted by all other masses. The other type of mass that mass consists of is inertial mass. Inertial mass is the mass type that makes all those motion attributes be.

In non einstin world there is only the mass type of mass. In the non einstein world, even though it knows the differenc, the einstein world is confusing weight and mass. This is done when attibute what we call gravity and motion to mass. Gravity may be a correct attrbute of mass. But placing the adjective of gravitational in front of mass does explain how mass causes gravity. deal with that in ugravitat.

each mass measured through second law diagram

gravitational mass. Newton did not know. every particle mistake, vector away

inertial mass history born out of aristotle.

mass is a scalar quantity

stationary ball. absence of external force and or plus inertia

Newton's first rule of reasoning

weightless during descent because mass is weightless

all things fall at the same rate because mass is weightless

off shoot of mass = why ball does not roll

fair go motive mathematical physics not giving the world a fair go

einstein ball stationary in the horizontal plane because of its quantity. non einstein ball stationary in the h p because of the absence of an external force in the h p..

Einstein ball continues rolling because of its quantity. non einstein continues rolling because of a a formual of mathematicla physics That formula being mometum. m x v

Einstein a resistance to increased or decreased velocity in the h p is inherent of the ball at all times. Non einstein reistance is the equal and opposite reaction to the foce causing the change and manifests as a measurable weight direct in the opposite to change of motion. The important non einstein point is the resistance is not inherent of matter. It does not exist prior to the force that is causing the change.

whatever weight is in the einstein world, in the non einstein world is the potential acceleration of mass.

In the einstein world every mass consists of two types of mass. One type of mass within mass is gravitational mass. That type of mass is what causes mass to attact all other masses and be attracted by all other masses. The other type of mass that mass consists of is inertial mass. Inertial mass is the mass type that makes all those motion attributes be.

In non einstin world there is only the mass type of mass. In the non einstein world, even though it knows the differenc, the einstein world is confusing weight and mass. This is done when attibute what we call gravity and motion to mass. Gravity may be a correct attrbute of mass. But placing the adjective of gravitational in front of mass does explain how mass causes gravity. deal with that in ugravitat.

uniform motion is the conservation of free momentum. What is regarded as inertial mass causing resistance to acceleration is accelerated mass instantaneously weighted within in the opposite direction to that acceleration. Not inherent.

Weight, whether due to an absence of descent in an inverse square law or due to an instantaneous resistance to acceleration, is the potential acceleration of mass.

That weightlessness during descent and the reason all quantiles of mass descend at the same rate is due to fact that mass is weightless.

mass is a scalar quantity

Weight, whether due to an absence of descent in an inverse square law or due to an instantaneous resistance to acceleration, is the potential acceleration of mass.

That weightlessness during descent and the reason all quantiles of mass descend at the same rate is due to fact that mass is weightless.

mass is a scalar quantity

mathematical ps get scientific. not so mathematical. universe never be solved thru equations.

uniform motion =

uniform motion =

scalar quantite and vector quantities

mass scalar becomes a vector through adjectives.

first part is the conservation of momentum not negotaiable greatest motion

resistance is weighting of mass in the opposite direction to an acceleration

mass scalar becomes a vector through adjectives.

**a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line**, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a forcefirst part is the conservation of momentum not negotaiable greatest motion

resistance is weighting of mass in the opposite direction to an acceleration

A little reflection will show that the law of the equality of the inertial and gravitational mass is equivalent to the assertion that the acceleration imparted to a body by a gravitational field is independent of the nature of the body. For Newton's equation of motion in a gravitational field, written out in full, it is:

(Inertial mass) . (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) . (Gravitational mass).It is only when there is numerical equality between the inertial and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body.

(Inertial mass) . (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) . (Gravitational mass).It is only when there is numerical equality between the inertial and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body.

prepared to be bored. The maintenance of the foundation of Einsteins theories requires a simple demonstration that weightless mass also exists as inertial mass and gravitational mass.

Our only

The first step to writing physics is stating that mass is a scalar quantity.

A scalar quantity is a quantity measured by its magnitude. In contrast a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be quantified.

The history of a differentiation between vector and scalar quantities seems to predate the Copernican revolution. Possibly can be traced back to the B.C period.

If scholarship had an intellectual rigour about the difference, we would not have lived through either of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.

mass is a scalar

Our only

The first step to writing physics is stating that mass is a scalar quantity.

A scalar quantity is a quantity measured by its magnitude. In contrast a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be quantified.

The history of a differentiation between vector and scalar quantities seems to predate the Copernican revolution. Possibly can be traced back to the B.C period.

If scholarship had an intellectual rigour about the difference, we would not have lived through either of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.

mass is a scalar

galileos mistake family etc

satellites

calculate size of inverse square law

animations

satellites

calculate size of inverse square law

animations

1/ planet future

2/ rotation rates Einstein not get there

3/ previous animation other animations no beef with Einstein

4/ predictions corruptions Neptune light bending

mass scalar only the mass type of mass

5/ Aristotle obsession with motion buriand

6/ Newton's first law misunderstands both motion and a resistance to a change of motion

7/ Measuring mass is done through newtons second law. 0/0

8/ define weight.

9/ only one kind of mass

10/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that resistance is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior

12/ first newton's law gravity

2/ rotation rates Einstein not get there

3/ previous animation other animations no beef with Einstein

4/ predictions corruptions Neptune light bending

mass scalar only the mass type of mass

5/ Aristotle obsession with motion buriand

6/ Newton's first law misunderstands both motion and a resistance to a change of motion

7/ Measuring mass is done through newtons second law. 0/0

8/ define weight.

9/ only one kind of mass

10/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that resistance is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior

12/ first newton's law gravity

0/ planet future

1/ rotation rates einstein not get there

2/ previous animation other animations no beef with einstien

3/ predictions corruptions neptune light bending

4/ how many types of mass can be mass be vector no no measuring each

5/ newton's law first is two laws strngth from galileos descrp of planetary motion

6/ weight is potential momentum

7/ resistance to a change of motion not inherent 0/0

8/ inertia is a weighting of mass in the opp direction to accel

9/ rolling ball

10/ mass in weightless

11 aristotle. newtons philoso[hy

12/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that inertia is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior

13/ first newton's law ogravity

1/ rotation rates einstein not get there

2/ previous animation other animations no beef with einstien

3/ predictions corruptions neptune light bending

4/ how many types of mass can be mass be vector no no measuring each

5/ newton's law first is two laws strngth from galileos descrp of planetary motion

6/ weight is potential momentum

7/ resistance to a change of motion not inherent 0/0

8/ inertia is a weighting of mass in the opp direction to accel

9/ rolling ball

10/ mass in weightless

11 aristotle. newtons philoso[hy

12/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that inertia is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior

13/ first newton's law ogravity

census?

animation

two types of mass come on weak minded

being dependent on acceleration to measure inertial mass leaves the concept of inertial mass maintaining uniform motion to be an unknown. means resistance to a change of motion originates with the force causing the change

each is measured calibrated by the inverses square standard mass

newton's first law of motion law of inertia weight is potential momentum

predictions

rotation rates

newton's law of gravity

animation

two types of mass come on weak minded

being dependent on acceleration to measure inertial mass leaves the concept of inertial mass maintaining uniform motion to be an unknown. means resistance to a change of motion originates with the force causing the change

each is measured calibrated by the inverses square standard mass

newton's first law of motion law of inertia weight is potential momentum

predictions

rotation rates

newton's law of gravity

lifting force required newton's cannon ball satellites society

descent is a relative motion ignoring 2 metre 0.6 second 20 km relative to sun

apple story

Galleo Einstein Newton

descent is a relative motion ignoring 2 metre 0.6 second 20 km relative to sun

apple story

Galleo Einstein Newton

historically the law of inertia

defining inertial mass through 2nd law is a contradiction of terms

does motion perservere as a mathematical fact or because of an untraceable property of matter

define weight. weight is relative to a chosen stanadrd that is 50 to 100

inertial mass measuring the equal and opposite acceleration to a weight. that is using the known rate of acceleration due to an inverse square law to measure the weight of one object relative to another.

principle of equivalence. gravitational mass using 2nd law to measure weight. thus when same object is measures as gravitational mass and then inertial mass it means that the mass of the object has not altered between measurements and general relativity is just a complex way of saying 1 = 1

Resistance to a change of motion is a weighting of a mass in the opposite direction to the force causing the change. Neither the reistance or the change causing force exist proior to the existence of the other.

Descent in an inverse square law. ristance in the inverse square law

defining inertial mass through 2nd law is a contradiction of terms

does motion perservere as a mathematical fact or because of an untraceable property of matter

define weight. weight is relative to a chosen stanadrd that is 50 to 100

inertial mass measuring the equal and opposite acceleration to a weight. that is using the known rate of acceleration due to an inverse square law to measure the weight of one object relative to another.

principle of equivalence. gravitational mass using 2nd law to measure weight. thus when same object is measures as gravitational mass and then inertial mass it means that the mass of the object has not altered between measurements and general relativity is just a complex way of saying 1 = 1

Resistance to a change of motion is a weighting of a mass in the opposite direction to the force causing the change. Neither the reistance or the change causing force exist proior to the existence of the other.

Descent in an inverse square law. ristance in the inverse square law

**We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.**

**a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.**

inertial mass is mass etc

essentially correcting aristotle

uniform motion is explained through aritmetic not physics.

contradictions only the mass type of mass.

why objects fall at same rate

resistance to change of motion

why a wheel rolls

definition of weight

principle of equivalencea property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55SaeTvXT8

all measurements of mass are a calibration against an acceleration rate.

This is just stupid. This is embarrassing.

if you don't believe that every particle in the universe is attracting every other particle in the universe, there is a not lot more to add. The second high tide being explained as the equal and opposite reaction across the centre of the earth and not through either a rotation around a joint earth moon centre of gravity inside the earth or a reduction in lunar inverse square law magnitude across the diameter of the earth or some combination of the two is the message of intent. Has burnt inside for over thrirty years by now. Coupled with the earth falling towards a moving point and not from its own motion towards a fixed point, that is basic information everyone should have.

There is to add a few things that are less definite but more significant if right. They are the probability that there is direct relationship between inverse square law rotation rate. That probabilty would be staring the plaent in the face is it wasn't for two laws of physics that simply shouldbnt be in the school books The first of those laws in Newtons laws of gravity.

There is to add a few things that are less definite but more significant if right. They are the probability that there is direct relationship between inverse square law rotation rate. That probabilty would be staring the plaent in the face is it wasn't for two laws of physics that simply shouldbnt be in the school books The first of those laws in Newtons laws of gravity.

We all look and sound like we do I guess. This is 2021. The first photo say 1967. The second definitely 1971. Between the two photos something scholastically unusal had happened. Physics classes were left in disbelief. The teacher of the time was delivering untenable explanations of both the tides of the earth and the motions of the planets around the sun. So, if you can bear with what some one looks and sounds like, the world may be able to move from fixed sun to moving sun scholarship. And just as importantly move on from a harebrained concept about every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.

Satellites. The earth is round. Us adults believe satellites orbit the earth because the earth is round. This allows a satellite to beat the earth's gravity. To be believing and teaching something as quaint as this we also say it is ultra important to know where a satellite would go if the earth's gravity field could be turned off.

Reasonably obviously the correct answer to the suspension and orbit of a satellite is the earth and its gravity field move at a speed much greater than a speed achieved during a descent. When we get to know this we don't or won't have say and teach that roundness of the earth is beating the earth's gravity for an orbiting stellite and schoolteachers we also be able to leave the earth's gravity field turned on at all times..

The world got its understanding of gravity and satellites messed up by a man named Sir Isaac Newton. At this later hour it is in our best interests to sort out the mistakes that Sir Isaac has bequeathed us..

the circle

We all look and sound like we do I guess. This is 2021. The first photo say 1967. The second definitely 1971. Between the two photos something scholastically unusal had happened. Physics classes were left in disbelief. The teacher of the time was delivering untenable explanations of both the tides of the earth and the motions of the planets around the sun. So, if you can bear with what some one looks and sounds like, the world may be able to move from fixed sun to moving sun scholarship. And just as importantly move on from a harebrained concept about every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.

Satellites. The earth is round. Us adults believe satellites orbit the earth because the earth is round. This allows a satellite to beat the earth's gravity. To be believing and teaching something as quaint as this we also say it is ultra important to know where a satellite would go if the earth's gravity field could be turned off.

Reasonably obviously the correct answer to the suspension and orbit of a satellite is the earth and its gravity field move at a speed much greater than a speed achieved during a descent. When we get to know this we don't or won't have say and teach that roundness of the earth is beating the earth's gravity for an orbiting stellite and schoolteachers we also be able to leave the earth's gravity field turned on at all times..

The world got its understanding of gravity and satellites messed up by a man named Sir Isaac Newton. At this later hour it is in our best interests to sort out the mistakes that Sir Isaac has bequeathed us..

the circle