Hello. Presuming the world is interested in itself, this is an important message. The tides of the earth are the equal and opposite forces of the earth. That's the message. If disenchantment with the production sets in that's fine. You have the message and movie maker or fame seeker is not the natural me.
An address to the Australian Prime Minister, the right honorable Anthony Albanese, the Governor General of Australia, General David Hurley and all other governors and members of Australian parliaments. Due to our education system, Australia is in a position to lead the world to better times. The world will be unlikely to be interested in the price of this. Academia in general and mathematical physicists in particular have the tides wrong. However, through Australia's sound lower school education in rural Australia back in the late 50s and 60s of last century, Australia is in as good a position as any to correct the fixed sun and mutual gravitation mistakes of the Copernican revolution that we get taught to align our lives with back at lower school levels of learning.
The basic Copernican educational correction is recognition of the superior motion of the sun around the milky way galaxy. Educationally, the revolution originally and wrongly switched an earth fixed in the centre of the universe for a sun fixed in the centre of the universe. As you would know the discovery of the superior motion of the sun has not become a basic fact of Australian primary school education as yet. The implications of that superior motion on the motions of the planets relative to the sun has not yet become a part of Australian secondary education reckonings. On the matter of the astronomical discovery of the motion of the whole solar system, Australian mathematical physicists and Australian academics in general are sound asleep at the wheel of Australian education. Descriptively snoring away in beds of government funded lifestyles, they need an awakening to the Copernican revolution mistakes that they continuously to endorse for the learning of those below them.
The other educational correction is a simple mathematical one concerning fall directions. A priority subtraction done by space agencies when they undertake a moonshot is missing from Australian tidal education. This calculation determines mutual terminations in both the earth and moon inverse square laws along the earth moon axis. That termination calculation is the doorway into an everyday scholarly understanding of why we observe high and low lunar tides in a quadrant pattern around this planet. Without the calculation becoming recognized for what it is, Australian junior school education is bereft of a singular tidal understanding. There are several explanations of the high tide on the other side of the earth to the moon in Australian secondary school education.
If you, as leaders of Australia, consider teaching the tides unquestioningly in plural and an unsound fashion to be in keeping with the establishment of the Australian constitution, this message ends here.
Allowing that you see the Australian constitution as a document in favour of teaching the motion of the sun and against the teaching of the tides through conflicting explanations, continue we shall. General Hurley you and I are and some others of this address are of the same vintage. A 1953 part of the post world war population boom . In modern popular opinion, us boomers are considered to be inappropriate members of Australian society. We are living rich and passing the problems of sustainability that we cause on for future generations to deal with. In the eyes of the awakening young, redemption we need.
Before explaining the high tide under the moon through moonshot arithmetic and a ball squeezing analogy, any correction of the Copernican revolution beginning on this land requires unfolding respect for those struggling with the latter day torment of terra nullius dispossession. Succinctly, if we are to be on a meaningful tidal journey to the centre of the earth, ideally the land the downward journey begins has its respect for humanity in order.
Where I am at is the 1967 referendum was an inferred constitutional rejection of terra nullius and the setting in motion of a slow burning question about Australia's legal relationship with the rest of the world. Personally can still remember the excitement of my parents when they piled in the car to go and vote. As a fourteen year old I still was trying to work out why the government would exclude Aborigines from the census. It just wouldn't be an accurate count.
Anyway the east coast of the land we call Australia was first accurately charted by Captain James Cook in 1770. This was done after he had provided safe scientific passage to Tahiti for an observation of a transit of Venus and also after circumnavigating virtually the entire New Zealand coastline. With European convicts, Aboriginal dispossession began in earnest some 18 years later in 1788. The legal basis for the dispossession was a European decree proclaiming this land belonged to no one except any European Kingdom dropping anchor, embarking and then claiming stood on territory for a European Kingdom. This decree is known as terra nullius. If there was registered ownership of the land on a world map, the land was vacant. If this decree had of been an appropriate one to apply to this land at the time, what has followed in most ways has been a reasonable or better representation of humanity. A free and fair system of elections have developed and section 128 of the Australian constitution makes it one of the better national governing constitutions on the planet today. Section 128 is the section that specifies the constitution can only be altered by a people's vote. With the caveat that such an alteration requirement only works if the original document provides a workable governing structure, there a certain deocratic beauty to section 128.
In 1992 the high court of Australia delivered a finding after considering a case challenging the original legitimacy of applying terra nullius to this land. The high court declared terra nullius null and void as a result. Most modern Australians had no trouble in accepting this. It didn't impact any land where there was no continuous indigenous connection and a past wrong was being recognized if not righted.
For whatever reason the 1992 high court judges did not realize that their ruling was reinstating terra nullius on land where original people had been completely removed between 1788 and 1992. To be over turned, the ruling had to apply to all land that terra nullius had originally claimed for the European Kingdom equally. Otherwise terra nullius was not overturned at all.
At the time I believed the logistical way through the issue was for the high court to refer the matter to the Australian parliament explaining to the parliament that an overturning of terra nullius would require a section 128 people's vote to decide whether or not this land was owned by Aborigines in 1788. Or was it vacant. The passing of thirty years has not changed that belief.
In terms of international borders, native title refers to the name the natives of an accepted nation of the world recognizes itself as. Currently the native title of this land is Australia. Post the convict era, there is several categories of natives here. Those of us born here and who can trace an origin on this land to before 1788. And those of us born here who but our heredity connection with the land post dates 1788. Begrudgingly or otherwise, Australia is what us natives of this land refer to this land as. Without terra nullius and with pre 1788 native title recognized, the title of this land remaining Australia makes a nonsense of the overturning.
Revolutionary thinking as this maybe, an alternative or appropriate native title suggestion for this land is Tiwi Islands. Tiwi meaning two, one island being the mainland and the other Tasmania. In terms of conciliation between natives, what a constitutional vote in favour of original native title means is the national identity of both future aboriginal and non aboriginal children is one that recognizes the pre 1788 people of this land. Bathurst and Melville Islands giving their approval, I would personally love to be a Tiwi Islander. Could be a better conciliatory native title for this land, though Descendants of pre 1788 Australia may have more applicable notions for what this nation should appear as on the world map. If you are an aborigine and human, adopting a title that means south or Europe is selling this land short.
The other connected matter is what you currently represent General Hurley. Over turning terra nullius would mean a revolutionary and complete separation from the European Kingdom. I personally voted against the 1999 separation model. It did not guarantee this nation a head of state. A parliament could not force itself to provide a 2/3's vote in a particular way. Plausibly a most favored candidate was the intention of the separation model but that wasn't what was put to the vote. A 2/3's vote requirement does nothing other than give veto power to a 1/3 of parliament. The actual sending of that idea to a section 128 vote was an insult to the more pure democracy of section 128.
The selection method I sent off to the convention back in 1998 had the states taking it turns to provide the Australian head of state. Meaning the head of state rotated through federation as an overseer of federation. The vice overseer came from the next state in the rotation. Personally and most definitely against becoming an anti monarchy republic or having a directly elected head of state. Would also like to get away from the appearance of high office collusion of a federal parliament choosing the onshore head of state and that head of state then appointing the prime minister post election. Separation of the two with equal respect for all states while maintaining an onshore head of state whose function is ceremonial and not instructive was the idea.
When Captain Cook's first voyage was observing the Venus transit in Tahiti in 1770, oral Aboriginal history says the fact that Venus orbits the sun was known. In particular by Torres strait islanders, a relationship between the tides and the moon was also recognized. At the time neither Europe or Australasia understood the why and how of that relationship. That void of intelligence on both sides of the world persists right up until today.
To explain the lunar tides, anything dropped on the surface of the earth accelerates towards the earth at a rate of 9.8 m/s/s. Except that the rate of acceleration itself increases marginally during the descent, this means that a falling object gains 9.8 m/s of velocity for every one second it falls. After 1 second of descent something dropped has a velocity of 9.8 m/s/s. After 2 seconds the speed has doubled and is 19.6 m/s etc. The moon is much smaller and the rate of fall on the surface of the moon is 1.6 m/s/s.
Along the earth moon axis these rates of fall towards each body are opposing. As mentioned these rates of fall increase during descent. Meaning that they decrease with an increase in altitude above each body. In Europe in the t7th century the rate of decrease was ascertained to be a mathematical/geometrical one. What this means is as the surface area of sphere around the earth increases, as a direct proportion the rate of fall towards the earth decreases. This is the earth's inverse square law of and the geometric mathematical nature of what we call the earth's gravity field. School teachers can explain it their classes with more clarity.
The moonshot calculation is working out where the direction fall reverses along the earth moon axis. The sun also has an inverse square law. The rate of fall towards the sun on the surface of the sun is 270 m/s/s. This figure does impact the location of the reversal. It does not, though, impact the fact of a change of direction of fall between the earth and the moon.
If you are not given to mathematics, worry not. These days I am not much either. The main thing to appreciate is there is opposite directions of fall along the earth moon axis. The distance between the earth and the moon varies over a 28 day period. The average distance between the earth and the moon is about 384,000 kilometres. When the earth and moon are at this distance apart in round figures the point where the a moonshot leaves the earth's inverse square law and enters the moon's inverse square law is 346,000 kilometres above the centre of the earth and 38,000 kilometres above the centre of the moon.
If it was not presence of each inverse square law, the rate of fall towards each body would be 0.0033 m/s/s. Not sure what space agencies do from there. They have determine where the moonshot ceases to need to be lifted from the earth and where it is falling towards the moon will begin.
The basic Copernican educational correction is recognition of the superior motion of the sun around the milky way galaxy. Educationally, the revolution originally and wrongly switched an earth fixed in the centre of the universe for a sun fixed in the centre of the universe. As you would know the discovery of the superior motion of the sun has not become a basic fact of Australian primary school education as yet. The implications of that superior motion on the motions of the planets relative to the sun has not yet become a part of Australian secondary education reckonings. On the matter of the astronomical discovery of the motion of the whole solar system, Australian mathematical physicists and Australian academics in general are sound asleep at the wheel of Australian education. Descriptively snoring away in beds of government funded lifestyles, they need an awakening to the Copernican revolution mistakes that they continuously to endorse for the learning of those below them.
The other educational correction is a simple mathematical one concerning fall directions. A priority subtraction done by space agencies when they undertake a moonshot is missing from Australian tidal education. This calculation determines mutual terminations in both the earth and moon inverse square laws along the earth moon axis. That termination calculation is the doorway into an everyday scholarly understanding of why we observe high and low lunar tides in a quadrant pattern around this planet. Without the calculation becoming recognized for what it is, Australian junior school education is bereft of a singular tidal understanding. There are several explanations of the high tide on the other side of the earth to the moon in Australian secondary school education.
If you, as leaders of Australia, consider teaching the tides unquestioningly in plural and an unsound fashion to be in keeping with the establishment of the Australian constitution, this message ends here.
Allowing that you see the Australian constitution as a document in favour of teaching the motion of the sun and against the teaching of the tides through conflicting explanations, continue we shall. General Hurley you and I are and some others of this address are of the same vintage. A 1953 part of the post world war population boom . In modern popular opinion, us boomers are considered to be inappropriate members of Australian society. We are living rich and passing the problems of sustainability that we cause on for future generations to deal with. In the eyes of the awakening young, redemption we need.
Before explaining the high tide under the moon through moonshot arithmetic and a ball squeezing analogy, any correction of the Copernican revolution beginning on this land requires unfolding respect for those struggling with the latter day torment of terra nullius dispossession. Succinctly, if we are to be on a meaningful tidal journey to the centre of the earth, ideally the land the downward journey begins has its respect for humanity in order.
Where I am at is the 1967 referendum was an inferred constitutional rejection of terra nullius and the setting in motion of a slow burning question about Australia's legal relationship with the rest of the world. Personally can still remember the excitement of my parents when they piled in the car to go and vote. As a fourteen year old I still was trying to work out why the government would exclude Aborigines from the census. It just wouldn't be an accurate count.
Anyway the east coast of the land we call Australia was first accurately charted by Captain James Cook in 1770. This was done after he had provided safe scientific passage to Tahiti for an observation of a transit of Venus and also after circumnavigating virtually the entire New Zealand coastline. With European convicts, Aboriginal dispossession began in earnest some 18 years later in 1788. The legal basis for the dispossession was a European decree proclaiming this land belonged to no one except any European Kingdom dropping anchor, embarking and then claiming stood on territory for a European Kingdom. This decree is known as terra nullius. If there was registered ownership of the land on a world map, the land was vacant. If this decree had of been an appropriate one to apply to this land at the time, what has followed in most ways has been a reasonable or better representation of humanity. A free and fair system of elections have developed and section 128 of the Australian constitution makes it one of the better national governing constitutions on the planet today. Section 128 is the section that specifies the constitution can only be altered by a people's vote. With the caveat that such an alteration requirement only works if the original document provides a workable governing structure, there a certain deocratic beauty to section 128.
In 1992 the high court of Australia delivered a finding after considering a case challenging the original legitimacy of applying terra nullius to this land. The high court declared terra nullius null and void as a result. Most modern Australians had no trouble in accepting this. It didn't impact any land where there was no continuous indigenous connection and a past wrong was being recognized if not righted.
For whatever reason the 1992 high court judges did not realize that their ruling was reinstating terra nullius on land where original people had been completely removed between 1788 and 1992. To be over turned, the ruling had to apply to all land that terra nullius had originally claimed for the European Kingdom equally. Otherwise terra nullius was not overturned at all.
At the time I believed the logistical way through the issue was for the high court to refer the matter to the Australian parliament explaining to the parliament that an overturning of terra nullius would require a section 128 people's vote to decide whether or not this land was owned by Aborigines in 1788. Or was it vacant. The passing of thirty years has not changed that belief.
In terms of international borders, native title refers to the name the natives of an accepted nation of the world recognizes itself as. Currently the native title of this land is Australia. Post the convict era, there is several categories of natives here. Those of us born here and who can trace an origin on this land to before 1788. And those of us born here who but our heredity connection with the land post dates 1788. Begrudgingly or otherwise, Australia is what us natives of this land refer to this land as. Without terra nullius and with pre 1788 native title recognized, the title of this land remaining Australia makes a nonsense of the overturning.
Revolutionary thinking as this maybe, an alternative or appropriate native title suggestion for this land is Tiwi Islands. Tiwi meaning two, one island being the mainland and the other Tasmania. In terms of conciliation between natives, what a constitutional vote in favour of original native title means is the national identity of both future aboriginal and non aboriginal children is one that recognizes the pre 1788 people of this land. Bathurst and Melville Islands giving their approval, I would personally love to be a Tiwi Islander. Could be a better conciliatory native title for this land, though Descendants of pre 1788 Australia may have more applicable notions for what this nation should appear as on the world map. If you are an aborigine and human, adopting a title that means south or Europe is selling this land short.
The other connected matter is what you currently represent General Hurley. Over turning terra nullius would mean a revolutionary and complete separation from the European Kingdom. I personally voted against the 1999 separation model. It did not guarantee this nation a head of state. A parliament could not force itself to provide a 2/3's vote in a particular way. Plausibly a most favored candidate was the intention of the separation model but that wasn't what was put to the vote. A 2/3's vote requirement does nothing other than give veto power to a 1/3 of parliament. The actual sending of that idea to a section 128 vote was an insult to the more pure democracy of section 128.
The selection method I sent off to the convention back in 1998 had the states taking it turns to provide the Australian head of state. Meaning the head of state rotated through federation as an overseer of federation. The vice overseer came from the next state in the rotation. Personally and most definitely against becoming an anti monarchy republic or having a directly elected head of state. Would also like to get away from the appearance of high office collusion of a federal parliament choosing the onshore head of state and that head of state then appointing the prime minister post election. Separation of the two with equal respect for all states while maintaining an onshore head of state whose function is ceremonial and not instructive was the idea.
When Captain Cook's first voyage was observing the Venus transit in Tahiti in 1770, oral Aboriginal history says the fact that Venus orbits the sun was known. In particular by Torres strait islanders, a relationship between the tides and the moon was also recognized. At the time neither Europe or Australasia understood the why and how of that relationship. That void of intelligence on both sides of the world persists right up until today.
To explain the lunar tides, anything dropped on the surface of the earth accelerates towards the earth at a rate of 9.8 m/s/s. Except that the rate of acceleration itself increases marginally during the descent, this means that a falling object gains 9.8 m/s of velocity for every one second it falls. After 1 second of descent something dropped has a velocity of 9.8 m/s/s. After 2 seconds the speed has doubled and is 19.6 m/s etc. The moon is much smaller and the rate of fall on the surface of the moon is 1.6 m/s/s.
Along the earth moon axis these rates of fall towards each body are opposing. As mentioned these rates of fall increase during descent. Meaning that they decrease with an increase in altitude above each body. In Europe in the t7th century the rate of decrease was ascertained to be a mathematical/geometrical one. What this means is as the surface area of sphere around the earth increases, as a direct proportion the rate of fall towards the earth decreases. This is the earth's inverse square law of and the geometric mathematical nature of what we call the earth's gravity field. School teachers can explain it their classes with more clarity.
The moonshot calculation is working out where the direction fall reverses along the earth moon axis. The sun also has an inverse square law. The rate of fall towards the sun on the surface of the sun is 270 m/s/s. This figure does impact the location of the reversal. It does not, though, impact the fact of a change of direction of fall between the earth and the moon.
If you are not given to mathematics, worry not. These days I am not much either. The main thing to appreciate is there is opposite directions of fall along the earth moon axis. The distance between the earth and the moon varies over a 28 day period. The average distance between the earth and the moon is about 384,000 kilometres. When the earth and moon are at this distance apart in round figures the point where the a moonshot leaves the earth's inverse square law and enters the moon's inverse square law is 346,000 kilometres above the centre of the earth and 38,000 kilometres above the centre of the moon.
If it was not presence of each inverse square law, the rate of fall towards each body would be 0.0033 m/s/s. Not sure what space agencies do from there. They have determine where the moonshot ceases to need to be lifted from the earth and where it is falling towards the moon will begin.
q1 ```````simple demo of tides entertained no put up with worthwile infp
big as the copernican revolution if the world can handle
existing tides
right subtraction
appeal to the Australian prime minister or governor general position to help the world iran waging a war against god due diligence job
motion of gravity field look forward to doing Ne 1st law
turn rates
pi better morality than god turns us to earth life after death
cross sexual evolution
climate change from the energy exiom dismissed
big as the copernican revolution if the world can handle
existing tides
right subtraction
appeal to the Australian prime minister or governor general position to help the world iran waging a war against god due diligence job
motion of gravity field look forward to doing Ne 1st law
turn rates
pi better morality than god turns us to earth life after death
cross sexual evolution
climate change from the energy exiom dismissed
Academically dishonest men and women would not have been entertained.
Those who wished for a better world could themselves.
Wherever the residence, there was a first step towards avoiding preventable planetary disaster. It was analyzing the tides at the centre of the earth.
This short video was a dramatic correcting of a mistake Sir Isaac Newton had made some centuries before. The mistake had been about the relationship between the earth and moon gravities.
Old professors not prepared to countenance their ingrained untruth were the order of the day.
In the shadow of that dishonesty, the rest were celebrating God and the end of days.
Those who wished for a better world could themselves.
Wherever the residence, there was a first step towards avoiding preventable planetary disaster. It was analyzing the tides at the centre of the earth.
This short video was a dramatic correcting of a mistake Sir Isaac Newton had made some centuries before. The mistake had been about the relationship between the earth and moon gravities.
Old professors not prepared to countenance their ingrained untruth were the order of the day.
In the shadow of that dishonesty, the rest were celebrating God and the end of days.
health 7200
rates 2600
gas 2500
electricity 500
regos 1500
car service 1200
petrol/diesel 100
water rates 1000
university people dishonest
mistake about the universe every particle in the universe
institutional first world fib
opposite directions
prof
mistake about the universe every particle in the universe
institutional first world fib
opposite directions
prof
don't smash the subscribe bottom like
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
the sin moves
the hard task of saying every professor is wrong.
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
desire
possibly would have been to explain the mistake in universal gravitation first. decision was made to first give a pointer to what the copernican revolution as it stands is hiding.
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
the sin moves
the hard task of saying every professor is wrong.
apologies standard speech impediment no infectious personality
desire
possibly would have been to explain the mistake in universal gravitation first. decision was made to first give a pointer to what the copernican revolution as it stands is hiding.
anticipate success. morality of professors and intelligence of politicians newtons word rule 1
motion of galaxy solar systm pendulm
smaller gravity field contained within a larger one. space is particulate
venus mercury stars slow down
moon speed changes
calculated the speed of the sun
gravity field s in motion at speeds superior to speeds caused by descent.
tides
english democracy
pi
speech impediment more video
motion of galaxy solar systm pendulm
smaller gravity field contained within a larger one. space is particulate
venus mercury stars slow down
moon speed changes
calculated the speed of the sun
gravity field s in motion at speeds superior to speeds caused by descent.
tides
english democracy
pi
speech impediment more video
dedication
genesis
right answers descent a relative motion animations newtons third law
professors politicians
how the world feels about its self
genesis
right answers descent a relative motion animations newtons third law
professors politicians
how the world feels about its self
should be enough there. duty bound if you say the copernican revolution
whether or not dealing with the emotions of the world felt like it
method of calculating the speed of the sun relative to the centre of the galaxy
stars slow down as they aproach galactic arms
60 km/sec can't see how the earths inverse square law supplies the moon with its galactic speed change
moon go one side or the other.
reason the universe.
whether or not dealing with the emotions of the world felt like it
method of calculating the speed of the sun relative to the centre of the galaxy
stars slow down as they aproach galactic arms
60 km/sec can't see how the earths inverse square law supplies the moon with its galactic speed change
moon go one side or the other.
reason the universe.
celestial announcement Aristarchus respect for good scholars
doorway into newton's mistake and understanding the tides same thing
newton third law
dark matter.
doorway into newton's mistake and understanding the tides same thing
newton third law
dark matter.
f someone else is doing this best. apple attracting the earth
his law of gravity clever alternation of direction of fall mistake
true law of gravity a prop to m/d2
constant cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed
second law
second law twice
F = Gm(M/d2) M(m/d2)
mutual umiversal
like earth fixed in the centre of the universe
in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration
10 kilos of mass
his law of gravity clever alternation of direction of fall mistake
true law of gravity a prop to m/d2
constant cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed
second law
second law twice
F = Gm(M/d2) M(m/d2)
mutual umiversal
like earth fixed in the centre of the universe
in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration
10 kilos of mass
introduction
creation of mass
creation of mass
Law of acceleration (Newton's second law) The rate of acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the force causing the acceleration and inversely proportional to the massiveness of the body.
First Newton first law correction note. Within an accelerated mass there is an inspired internal weighting acting in the opposite direction to the acceleration. This is where the force that caused the acceleration dissipates. The Galilean/Newtonian mistake was assessing that this oppositely directed weighting is born in or inherent of mass. It does not exist in any form prior to a force that causes the acceleration.
Second Newton first law correction note. The conservation of the momentum of a free travelling body and uniform motion are one and the same.
Law of acceleration weight note. Weight is the potential acceleration or potential relative acceleration of mass.
Force Law (Newton's third law) To every force there is an equal and opposite force.
Law of acceleration (Newton's second law) The rate of acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the force causing the acceleration and inversely proportional to the massiveness of the body.
First Newton first law correction note. Within an accelerated mass there is an inspired internal weighting acting in the opposite direction to the acceleration. This is where the force that caused the acceleration dissipates. The Galilean/Newtonian mistake was assessing that this oppositely directed weighting is born in or inherent of mass. It does not exist in any form prior to a force that causes the acceleration.
Second Newton first law correction note. The conservation of the momentum of a free travelling body and uniform motion are one and the same.
Law of acceleration weight note. Weight is the potential acceleration or potential relative acceleration of mass.
Force Law (Newton's third law) To every force there is an equal and opposite force.
nfl false correction of aristotle
correct correction momentum and ntl
newtons second law to measure weight
inertia horizonta plane weight
one type of mass
rolling ball
weightlessness
prove that history is correct with its invention of two types of mass
correct correction momentum and ntl
newtons second law to measure weight
inertia horizonta plane weight
one type of mass
rolling ball
weightlessness
prove that history is correct with its invention of two types of mass
scalar quantity vector mass
momentum not inertia
continuation of newton's third law not his first explains a résistance to a change of of motion
newton's second law to measure weight
jerrys anumations
inertial mass gravitational mass
weightlessness
stationary/rolling ball
einsteins rocket
newton rule 1
momentum not inertia
continuation of newton's third law not his first explains a résistance to a change of of motion
newton's second law to measure weight
jerrys anumations
inertial mass gravitational mass
weightlessness
stationary/rolling ball
einsteins rocket
newton rule 1
problem false correction Aristotle motion force
correct answer momentum. if addition a truth conservation of momentum
tied in with a resistance to a change of uniform motion
Newtons second law problem balls car
two types of mass
equivalent einstein called this a law
measurement of mass types.
weighlessness
scalar quantity science decide how many types of mass there are
stationary ball no horistontal force
particles of a rolling ball follow a the rhthym of a penulum
some of momentum parts being conserved up causes the dowm etc
einsteins rocket implies that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same thing
newtons first rule of resoning law of gravity next motive
correct answer momentum. if addition a truth conservation of momentum
tied in with a resistance to a change of uniform motion
Newtons second law problem balls car
two types of mass
equivalent einstein called this a law
measurement of mass types.
weighlessness
scalar quantity science decide how many types of mass there are
stationary ball no horistontal force
particles of a rolling ball follow a the rhthym of a penulum
some of momentum parts being conserved up causes the dowm etc
einsteins rocket implies that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same thing
newtons first rule of resoning law of gravity next motive
summary
ristance to change of motion does not exist prior to the force that causes the change
the conservation of momentum is aritjmetically explained
ristance to change of motion does not exist prior to the force that causes the change
the conservation of momentum is aritjmetically explained
gravity aside, two problems with Newtonian physics.
The first is the idea that a resistance to a change of a state of momentum is inherent of matter.
Resistance to momentum change does not exist prior to the force that causes the change.
other problem is a lack of reasoning or statement about why momentum is conserved.
Colliding bodies conservation underlying truth free travelling body.
ball rolling across the table demonstration of the conservation of momentum
The first is the idea that a resistance to a change of a state of momentum is inherent of matter.
Resistance to momentum change does not exist prior to the force that causes the change.
other problem is a lack of reasoning or statement about why momentum is conserved.
Colliding bodies conservation underlying truth free travelling body.
ball rolling across the table demonstration of the conservation of momentum
rocket/elevator
aristotole
momentum conservation is momentum conserved by inertial mass or through definition
momentum preceded copernican revolution
mass is a scalar quantity surreptitious
why the ball is stationary
why a ball rolls weight transfer across a centre
is the ball rolling because its momentum is being conserved
weightless during descent reflection that we use the inverse square law to measure mass when it is resting on the earth's surface
different masses fall at the same rate
mass is a scalar quantity motive
To a certain extent planetary motion and satellitic suspension is academic. what does it matter in the main we live our lives as if the earth was fixed in space as the ancients believe and knowledge of the motion of the earth does not greatly change that. Untruth about the tides though are a little more impactful. Will address existing ideas about the far side high tide later. The first on to undertsnad in the one under the moon. It is a simple mathematical reasoning that any school kid should be able to follow and the make a judgement about. It doesnt begin vastly different to the Newtonian approach. The moon;s inverse square law acts is in one direction. The earth's inverse square law acts in the opposite direction. Tou had the two together and if you have a high tide. Where it changes and the new direction commences is this is seen as having a right angled relative impact on the earth's
if someone else is doing this best. apple attracting the earth
his law of gravity clever alternation of direction of fall mistake true law of gravity a prop to m/d2 constant cavenedish small mass cancel large fixed second law second law twice F = Gm(M/d2) M(m/d2) mutual umiversal like earth fixed in the centre of the universe in one instance mass rep mass the other mass rep acceleration 10 kilos of mass |
super throne ego
base problem smaller mass does bigger
True law of gravity a = m/d2 consnt of that. cavenish experiment
newton's second law
base problem smaller mass does bigger
True law of gravity a = m/d2 consnt of that. cavenish experiment
newton's second law
peer review covid Mass existing in two forms needs a solid peer review.
each mass measured through second law diagram
gravitational mass. Newton did not know. every particle mistake, vector away
inertial mass history born out of aristotle.
mass is a scalar quantity
stationary ball. absence of external force and or plus inertia
Newton's first rule of reasoning
weightless during descent because mass is weightless
all things fall at the same rate because mass is weightless
off shoot of mass = why ball does not roll
fair go motive mathematical physics not giving the world a fair go
einstein ball stationary in the horizontal plane because of its quantity. non einstein ball stationary in the h p because of the absence of an external force in the h p..
Einstein ball continues rolling because of its quantity. non einstein continues rolling because of a a formual of mathematicla physics That formula being mometum. m x v
Einstein a resistance to increased or decreased velocity in the h p is inherent of the ball at all times. Non einstein reistance is the equal and opposite reaction to the foce causing the change and manifests as a measurable weight direct in the opposite to change of motion. The important non einstein point is the resistance is not inherent of matter. It does not exist prior to the force that is causing the change.
whatever weight is in the einstein world, in the non einstein world is the potential acceleration of mass.
In the einstein world every mass consists of two types of mass. One type of mass within mass is gravitational mass. That type of mass is what causes mass to attact all other masses and be attracted by all other masses. The other type of mass that mass consists of is inertial mass. Inertial mass is the mass type that makes all those motion attributes be.
In non einstin world there is only the mass type of mass. In the non einstein world, even though it knows the differenc, the einstein world is confusing weight and mass. This is done when attibute what we call gravity and motion to mass. Gravity may be a correct attrbute of mass. But placing the adjective of gravitational in front of mass does explain how mass causes gravity. deal with that in ugravitat.
each mass measured through second law diagram
gravitational mass. Newton did not know. every particle mistake, vector away
inertial mass history born out of aristotle.
mass is a scalar quantity
stationary ball. absence of external force and or plus inertia
Newton's first rule of reasoning
weightless during descent because mass is weightless
all things fall at the same rate because mass is weightless
off shoot of mass = why ball does not roll
fair go motive mathematical physics not giving the world a fair go
einstein ball stationary in the horizontal plane because of its quantity. non einstein ball stationary in the h p because of the absence of an external force in the h p..
Einstein ball continues rolling because of its quantity. non einstein continues rolling because of a a formual of mathematicla physics That formula being mometum. m x v
Einstein a resistance to increased or decreased velocity in the h p is inherent of the ball at all times. Non einstein reistance is the equal and opposite reaction to the foce causing the change and manifests as a measurable weight direct in the opposite to change of motion. The important non einstein point is the resistance is not inherent of matter. It does not exist prior to the force that is causing the change.
whatever weight is in the einstein world, in the non einstein world is the potential acceleration of mass.
In the einstein world every mass consists of two types of mass. One type of mass within mass is gravitational mass. That type of mass is what causes mass to attact all other masses and be attracted by all other masses. The other type of mass that mass consists of is inertial mass. Inertial mass is the mass type that makes all those motion attributes be.
In non einstin world there is only the mass type of mass. In the non einstein world, even though it knows the differenc, the einstein world is confusing weight and mass. This is done when attibute what we call gravity and motion to mass. Gravity may be a correct attrbute of mass. But placing the adjective of gravitational in front of mass does explain how mass causes gravity. deal with that in ugravitat.
uniform motion is the conservation of free momentum. What is regarded as inertial mass causing resistance to acceleration is accelerated mass instantaneously weighted within in the opposite direction to that acceleration. Not inherent.
Weight, whether due to an absence of descent in an inverse square law or due to an instantaneous resistance to acceleration, is the potential acceleration of mass.
That weightlessness during descent and the reason all quantiles of mass descend at the same rate is due to fact that mass is weightless.
mass is a scalar quantity
Weight, whether due to an absence of descent in an inverse square law or due to an instantaneous resistance to acceleration, is the potential acceleration of mass.
That weightlessness during descent and the reason all quantiles of mass descend at the same rate is due to fact that mass is weightless.
mass is a scalar quantity
mathematical ps get scientific. not so mathematical. universe never be solved thru equations.
uniform motion =
uniform motion =
scalar quantite and vector quantities
mass scalar becomes a vector through adjectives.
a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force
first part is the conservation of momentum not negotaiable greatest motion
resistance is weighting of mass in the opposite direction to an acceleration
mass scalar becomes a vector through adjectives.
a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force
first part is the conservation of momentum not negotaiable greatest motion
resistance is weighting of mass in the opposite direction to an acceleration
A little reflection will show that the law of the equality of the inertial and gravitational mass is equivalent to the assertion that the acceleration imparted to a body by a gravitational field is independent of the nature of the body. For Newton's equation of motion in a gravitational field, written out in full, it is:
(Inertial mass) . (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) . (Gravitational mass).It is only when there is numerical equality between the inertial and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body.
(Inertial mass) . (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) . (Gravitational mass).It is only when there is numerical equality between the inertial and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body.
prepared to be bored. The maintenance of the foundation of Einsteins theories requires a simple demonstration that weightless mass also exists as inertial mass and gravitational mass.
Our only
The first step to writing physics is stating that mass is a scalar quantity.
A scalar quantity is a quantity measured by its magnitude. In contrast a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be quantified.
The history of a differentiation between vector and scalar quantities seems to predate the Copernican revolution. Possibly can be traced back to the B.C period.
If scholarship had an intellectual rigour about the difference, we would not have lived through either of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.
mass is a scalar
Our only
The first step to writing physics is stating that mass is a scalar quantity.
A scalar quantity is a quantity measured by its magnitude. In contrast a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be quantified.
The history of a differentiation between vector and scalar quantities seems to predate the Copernican revolution. Possibly can be traced back to the B.C period.
If scholarship had an intellectual rigour about the difference, we would not have lived through either of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.
mass is a scalar
galileos mistake family etc
satellites
calculate size of inverse square law
animations
satellites
calculate size of inverse square law
animations
1/ planet future
2/ rotation rates Einstein not get there
3/ previous animation other animations no beef with Einstein
4/ predictions corruptions Neptune light bending
mass scalar only the mass type of mass
5/ Aristotle obsession with motion buriand
6/ Newton's first law misunderstands both motion and a resistance to a change of motion
7/ Measuring mass is done through newtons second law. 0/0
8/ define weight.
9/ only one kind of mass
10/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that resistance is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
12/ first newton's law gravity
2/ rotation rates Einstein not get there
3/ previous animation other animations no beef with Einstein
4/ predictions corruptions Neptune light bending
mass scalar only the mass type of mass
5/ Aristotle obsession with motion buriand
6/ Newton's first law misunderstands both motion and a resistance to a change of motion
7/ Measuring mass is done through newtons second law. 0/0
8/ define weight.
9/ only one kind of mass
10/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that resistance is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
12/ first newton's law gravity
0/ planet future
1/ rotation rates einstein not get there
2/ previous animation other animations no beef with einstien
3/ predictions corruptions neptune light bending
4/ how many types of mass can be mass be vector no no measuring each
5/ newton's law first is two laws strngth from galileos descrp of planetary motion
6/ weight is potential momentum
7/ resistance to a change of motion not inherent 0/0
8/ inertia is a weighting of mass in the opp direction to accel
9/ rolling ball
10/ mass in weightless
11 aristotle. newtons philoso[hy
12/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that inertia is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
13/ first newton's law ogravity
1/ rotation rates einstein not get there
2/ previous animation other animations no beef with einstien
3/ predictions corruptions neptune light bending
4/ how many types of mass can be mass be vector no no measuring each
5/ newton's law first is two laws strngth from galileos descrp of planetary motion
6/ weight is potential momentum
7/ resistance to a change of motion not inherent 0/0
8/ inertia is a weighting of mass in the opp direction to accel
9/ rolling ball
10/ mass in weightless
11 aristotle. newtons philoso[hy
12/ 4 things 1/ demonstrate nflm is a law. 2/ Prove that there is 2 masses. 3/ show that inertia is not a weighing of mass in an opposite direction to an acceleration. 4. show that resistance is inherent. prior
13/ first newton's law ogravity
census?
animation
two types of mass come on weak minded
being dependent on acceleration to measure inertial mass leaves the concept of inertial mass maintaining uniform motion to be an unknown. means resistance to a change of motion originates with the force causing the change
each is measured calibrated by the inverses square standard mass
newton's first law of motion law of inertia weight is potential momentum
predictions
rotation rates
newton's law of gravity
animation
two types of mass come on weak minded
being dependent on acceleration to measure inertial mass leaves the concept of inertial mass maintaining uniform motion to be an unknown. means resistance to a change of motion originates with the force causing the change
each is measured calibrated by the inverses square standard mass
newton's first law of motion law of inertia weight is potential momentum
predictions
rotation rates
newton's law of gravity
lifting force required newton's cannon ball satellites society
descent is a relative motion ignoring 2 metre 0.6 second 20 km relative to sun
apple story
Galleo Einstein Newton
descent is a relative motion ignoring 2 metre 0.6 second 20 km relative to sun
apple story
Galleo Einstein Newton
historically the law of inertia
defining inertial mass through 2nd law is a contradiction of terms
does motion perservere as a mathematical fact or because of an untraceable property of matter
define weight. weight is relative to a chosen stanadrd that is 50 to 100
inertial mass measuring the equal and opposite acceleration to a weight. that is using the known rate of acceleration due to an inverse square law to measure the weight of one object relative to another.
principle of equivalence. gravitational mass using 2nd law to measure weight. thus when same object is measures as gravitational mass and then inertial mass it means that the mass of the object has not altered between measurements and general relativity is just a complex way of saying 1 = 1
Resistance to a change of motion is a weighting of a mass in the opposite direction to the force causing the change. Neither the reistance or the change causing force exist proior to the existence of the other.
Descent in an inverse square law. ristance in the inverse square law
defining inertial mass through 2nd law is a contradiction of terms
does motion perservere as a mathematical fact or because of an untraceable property of matter
define weight. weight is relative to a chosen stanadrd that is 50 to 100
inertial mass measuring the equal and opposite acceleration to a weight. that is using the known rate of acceleration due to an inverse square law to measure the weight of one object relative to another.
principle of equivalence. gravitational mass using 2nd law to measure weight. thus when same object is measures as gravitational mass and then inertial mass it means that the mass of the object has not altered between measurements and general relativity is just a complex way of saying 1 = 1
Resistance to a change of motion is a weighting of a mass in the opposite direction to the force causing the change. Neither the reistance or the change causing force exist proior to the existence of the other.
Descent in an inverse square law. ristance in the inverse square law
We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.
a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.
inertial mass is mass etc
essentially correcting aristotle
uniform motion is explained through aritmetic not physics.
contradictions only the mass type of mass.
why objects fall at same rate
resistance to change of motion
why a wheel rolls
definition of weight
principle of equivalencea property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55SaeTvXT8
all measurements of mass are a calibration against an acceleration rate.
a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force.
inertial mass is mass etc
essentially correcting aristotle
uniform motion is explained through aritmetic not physics.
contradictions only the mass type of mass.
why objects fall at same rate
resistance to change of motion
why a wheel rolls
definition of weight
principle of equivalencea property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55SaeTvXT8
all measurements of mass are a calibration against an acceleration rate.
This is just stupid. This is embarrassing.
if you don't believe that every particle in the universe is attracting every other particle in the universe, there is a not lot more to add. The second high tide being explained as the equal and opposite reaction across the centre of the earth and not through either a rotation around a joint earth moon centre of gravity inside the earth or a reduction in lunar inverse square law magnitude across the diameter of the earth or some combination of the two is the message of intent. Has burnt inside for over thrirty years by now. Coupled with the earth falling towards a moving point and not from its own motion towards a fixed point, that is basic information everyone should have.
There is to add a few things that are less definite but more significant if right. They are the probability that there is direct relationship between inverse square law rotation rate. That probabilty would be staring the plaent in the face is it wasn't for two laws of physics that simply shouldbnt be in the school books The first of those laws in Newtons laws of gravity.
There is to add a few things that are less definite but more significant if right. They are the probability that there is direct relationship between inverse square law rotation rate. That probabilty would be staring the plaent in the face is it wasn't for two laws of physics that simply shouldbnt be in the school books The first of those laws in Newtons laws of gravity.
We all look and sound like we do I guess. This is 2021. The first photo say 1967. The second definitely 1971. Between the two photos something scholastically unusal had happened. Physics classes were left in disbelief. The teacher of the time was delivering untenable explanations of both the tides of the earth and the motions of the planets around the sun. So, if you can bear with what some one looks and sounds like, the world may be able to move from fixed sun to moving sun scholarship. And just as importantly move on from a harebrained concept about every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.
Satellites. The earth is round. Us adults believe satellites orbit the earth because the earth is round. This allows a satellite to beat the earth's gravity. To be believing and teaching something as quaint as this we also say it is ultra important to know where a satellite would go if the earth's gravity field could be turned off.
Reasonably obviously the correct answer to the suspension and orbit of a satellite is the earth and its gravity field move at a speed much greater than a speed achieved during a descent. When we get to know this we don't or won't have say and teach that roundness of the earth is beating the earth's gravity for an orbiting stellite and schoolteachers we also be able to leave the earth's gravity field turned on at all times..
The world got its understanding of gravity and satellites messed up by a man named Sir Isaac Newton. At this later hour it is in our best interests to sort out the mistakes that Sir Isaac has bequeathed us..
the circle
We all look and sound like we do I guess. This is 2021. The first photo say 1967. The second definitely 1971. Between the two photos something scholastically unusal had happened. Physics classes were left in disbelief. The teacher of the time was delivering untenable explanations of both the tides of the earth and the motions of the planets around the sun. So, if you can bear with what some one looks and sounds like, the world may be able to move from fixed sun to moving sun scholarship. And just as importantly move on from a harebrained concept about every particle in the universe attracting every other particle in the universe.
Satellites. The earth is round. Us adults believe satellites orbit the earth because the earth is round. This allows a satellite to beat the earth's gravity. To be believing and teaching something as quaint as this we also say it is ultra important to know where a satellite would go if the earth's gravity field could be turned off.
Reasonably obviously the correct answer to the suspension and orbit of a satellite is the earth and its gravity field move at a speed much greater than a speed achieved during a descent. When we get to know this we don't or won't have say and teach that roundness of the earth is beating the earth's gravity for an orbiting stellite and schoolteachers we also be able to leave the earth's gravity field turned on at all times..
The world got its understanding of gravity and satellites messed up by a man named Sir Isaac Newton. At this later hour it is in our best interests to sort out the mistakes that Sir Isaac has bequeathed us..
the circle