Newton's 'gravity' mistakes
  • diagrams

****   Descent Relativity 2 -   week 7

Picture


The Pilots Have Just Swallowed Truth Serum


The aliens are off trying to materialize a loo. This is now your local radio telescope transmitting gathered solar system data. Unfortunately, your regular pilots, poor old Captain Albert WayToStupid and Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch, they are sure both due for academic repose. They are deadish. Well dead.

​Just a while ago a flight attendant gave them each a cup of warm truth serum. A little new earth data, the motion of the sun, that had been slowly stirred in. This motion is the new specific of the serum. So the captains take their sips. Without a murmur, both have immediately collapsed. As the rest of the serum spilt onto the altimeter, lifelessly onto their joysticks they went. If that altimeter is still working, you are going up.

Hopefully no-one is of dead pilot panic and distress. Fortunately your pilot is now Captain Batman InFlightMovies. And you sure now are above the extreme odour. It was your fixed sun professor's annual nude farting picnic. Keep going up and you should find schoolbook relief from Captain UnfortunateGlitch's extremely stupid solution to planetary motion.
Picture
On this next level you learn that mathematical physicists are being manufactured upside down by your universities. This has been the case for centuries on end. Living with heads buried in the sand and saying a universe is happening and I can do equations was never going to be of much use to anyone.
Picture

​Up here we can see the very poor physics of poor old Captain UnfortunateGlitch's years of yon planetary motion solution.
Picture
With apparent good intentions, Captain UnfortunateGlitch pulls a swifty on kith and kin and mainly himself. Then, in a case of truth stranger than fiction, hundreds of years worth of your intelligent university bound school kids had off days when planetary motion was taught. None have noticed that planets can't ascend and descend at the same time. In fact many of you are to fall ecstatically in love with the illusion. Your higher education research into the universe has thus been born on a day that your parent or guardian should have called the school head and explained that you were home with a fresh bout of intellectual impairment. Particularly in your universities, there had been a lot of that going around.
​
So Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch has set the wheels in motion to take your planetary motion science in a WayToStupid direction. In Captain UnfortunateGlitch's defence we have to remember that the sun and all the other stars were firmly fixed in his mind.

Also he had concern about getting the robes of a current pope completely tangled and dishevelled. Legally enforceable papal infallibility was the background music during the life and times of the late Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch.

​Your ever helpful overhead carry on luggage compartments are still working hard on Captain Albert WayToStupid's defence. This one is so much tougher. Like a number of other pilots, Captain WayToStupid was born ovine like. With their modern circumstances, pilots living goofy fixed inverse square law mistakes are very hard sheep to exonerate in full. Still, the overheads try. As our flight progresses, they are working hard on a wool mutually pulled over both eyes loophole. And it looks like working. As the jury comes in, a technicality has got Captain Albert WayToStupid off the very serious preliminary charge of doing way to much stupid fixed inverse square law science. 

Yes. The motion of the sun and the rest of the stars is what Captain UnfortunateGlitch didn't get to appreciate. You can and it's the celestial route you are now looking for. It's the answer to his fantastic expectation of all the planets climbing as they fall downwards to a fixed star.

Up a little higher again, things have become calmer. You can now see the motion of a gravity field and the motion of a falling object in the one frame.
Picture
Even if he was still alive, the basic relative motion premise of the above diagram would be quite inarguable to Captain Albert WayToStupid. And, for anyone on board managing to make straight line descent a personal truth, the oxygen masks are right above. Whatever your university degree, proper medical attention will be immediately available and on the tarmac when Captain Batman InFlightMovies touches this big bird down.

​The facts are, while an object falls towards the earth for one second, the earth advances a couple of hundred kilometres around the galaxy.

​Apparent gravity direction/axis to the centre of a fixed earth and a descent path are not coincidental.
​
1/ An axis towards the centre of a fixed earth, in terms of descent within the motion of the earth's inverse square, is a descent datum. It is an apparent direction of gravity but it's not a descent path.

2/ A descent path is towards the path of the earth. Which is a curve around a moving earth.

Your professors and rocket launchers have need to acknowledge the relevance of the motion of an inverse square law through space to descent through space within that inverse square law sometime soon. Or, commensurate with the latest looped announcements coming out of all your airport lounges, they will get airline food forever. Their spouse will get every single frequent flyer point they ever owned. The message ends as an ad hoc political announcement. "Vote 1. Descent relativity."

​
Picture

​Your academic revolution back down in classroom land is quite the ignoramus without knowledge about descent on your planet always being a curve around a portion of your planet. A relative motion.

Interestingly, in its infancy, your revolution deduced that the earth is in motion.

Not fixed.

Your revolution then flew against its own essence.

It left your earth fixed for the physics of the motion of a satellite around the earth.

Thanks to good old Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch and subsequent elegant well dressed professors blithely following this fixed star pied piper over the cliff, that's the current next to useless flight plan this planet of yours has.

You kinda need a data update going on here.

To get anywhere using your modestly telescopically enhanced senses, the flight plan needs to include inverse square laws moving much faster than the descents they cause. Or gravity fields moving much faster than the descents they cause for any other nationality attentively tuned into Captain Batman InFlightMovies.


When the above diagram is transported to the motion of the sun's gravity field, it means that a planet is actually a pendulum swinging through space in an onwards direction. Not whatever Captain UnfortunateGlitch and your Royal Society of England says they are hundreds of years ago. Which was what? Some sort of inertial centripetal object orbiting a fixed centre. This is plaino wrongo. After brekkie and when a green light comes on, could you please drop inertia and centripetal acceleration into an available pan. Push that blue button. Make sure these disgusting concepts are sucked right down the pooper and far away from all the children on board.

To be teaching fixed gravity field orbital motion year in year out when you know it's not true makes professors giving the imprimatur one big bag of extraordinarily glorious jet set nut cases, undoubtedly on some form of illegal designer narcotic. You could easily be doing better with your scholarship back down on that planet third out from the sun. In two dimensions, the stuff below shows the basics of the earth's galactic trajectory for a two year period.
Picture

If they could all lay off that illicit fixed sun drug scene, these diagrams lack the precision that one of your modern professors up in first class could muster up. That little precision handicap doesn't make planets ascend in a fixed sun's gravity field. 
​
Picture
​​
​
​
60 degrees. That's supposed to be about the angle you have used us to measure the path of the sun to fixed sun planetary orbits to be.

Meaning in three dimensions the six monthly speed differential will be less than the 60 km/sec shown here. Along with the precise speed of the sun, that's not relevant to the fact that the motion of the sun's inverse square law works to constantly change the speed of a planet up above and then down below the actual speed of the sun. If the speed change of the sun's inverse square law is negligible during a planet's cycle of the sun, the minimum and maximum speeds are going to be absolute and in the direction of the path of the sun.
​
If you can look away from Captain Batman InFlightMovies for just for a moment, the faster moving star you can now see out those port side windows is the centre of the moving inverse square law causing the swing of the pendulum that is a home to ever so many of you. The earth.

The indispensable words to be taking in here are "the earth's apparent direction of fall towards the sun orbits the earth's galactic path once a year".

That's the growing circle you have been seeing and your data update.


The wavy line is the earth's resultant descent path and on and on the descent around the galaxy goes. You wouldn't know about this except for you building, umm, us.

​
Picture

​With this link to the beginning of Captain Albert WayToStupid and Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch's afterlife, someone on earth is starting to give your reality a thumbs up. The criticisms of his work are valid, the vortex stuff and extrapolations he could reassess. It does wander off in that earth professor druggo direction. Equally his animation says and says well that no more fixed sun heliocentric solar system model is fit for a sane and sensible drug free earth professor. The animation doesn't have it right. But, to its observer, it demonstrates that the relationship between the motion of a planet and the sun's inverse square law is different to what your academic druggos are blithely brainwashing into the heads of their next lot. And, with respect of a rocket launch from earth, demonstrates that your rocket scientists have some learning to do about the path of a rocket descent in the motion of a gravity field. It's an open ended curving relative motion, not straight and towards the centre of a fixed earth. Who knows for sure. After some time in the moving inverse square law rehabilitation centre, they might get off fixed inverse square laws.

If there are ever any clean moving sun human professors on earth, you just have to do a much better job of the animation than this gent and away your next generation goes into sun in motion reality. That just means the planets need to always be at their distance from the sun and the sun is always moving. The animation starts off with a fixed sun which is not quite the way to go about it. And the planets do spend half the time in front of the sun.

​

​If you can find a few clean tutors to get the animation accurate, longer and coming off their lecterns, it's a good thing. That the planets are experiencing cyclical up and down momentum changes is what every modern professor should know by the age of about ten.

​Like if old Captain Albert WayToStupid, sadly he didn't have a moving sun animation. For descent paths, he left inverse square laws fixed. Wasted his life away developing that ascent mistake of old Captain Galileo UnfortunateGlitch into super goof. Such a misfortune he had in his early days. Gets in with a wrong crowd, a rowdy batch of fixed sun professors out for a quick hit, sadly his life goes way off the rails. In these unfortunate formative years he just hasn't been in a position to learn about the pendulum he is on. If he had of, the marriage theory he tried out on a fellow mathematical scholar after their union had a few trouble spots may not have come to pass. After a while, matrimony had become a rewriting of Sir Isaac Newton's theory of the mutual gravitation of the entire universe for the late and great Captain Albert WayToStupid.


CONDITIONS OF MATRIMONY

A. You will make sure:

1. that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order;
2. that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room;
3. that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my desk is left for my use only.

B. You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they are not completely necessary for social reasons. Specifically, You will forego:

1. my sitting at home with you;
2. my going out or travelling with you.

C. You will obey the following points in your relations with me:

1. you will not expect any intimacy from me, nor will you reproach me in any way;
2. you will stop talking to me if I request it;
3. you will leave my bedroom or study immediately without protest if I request it.

D. You will undertake not to belittle me in front of our children, either through words or behaviour.


Using fixed inverse square laws and this detailed matrimony theory as base camp, Captain Albert WayToStupid then developed a theory of general relativity. 
​
As it was to work out, Captain Albert WayToSupid's comprehensive marriage theory failed. In an equation re jig he climbs in the cockpit with a cousin. Later, melancholy sets in. The cousin has died. All in all, a tragic now concluded life old Captain Albert WayToStupid was to have had. Lived during you developing us into the beautiful dishes that some of us really are. By then his lifestyle was spiralling into an abyss already filling fast with syringes, general druggo paraphernalia and all manner of chauvinistic professors overdosed on fixed sun physics.

​The true moral of the story being your mathematical physics professors need to know they are on a galactic pendulum. 

​If it existed, the straight line rate of the earth's annual/never ending descent is 0.512 km/sec/day. That's the Kepler third law straight line magnitude of the sun's inverse square law at the earth's distance from the sun. The 0.512 km/sec/day part exists. The straight line part only exists in close approximation.

Earth professors taking the cure can explain it all to them selves better if they can. The only real way of quantifying non straight line descent is through recognising that, due to its motion, a gravity field has a front and back.

​
Picture

​If you are another utterly gorgeous mathematical physics professor lost in another batch of fixed inverse square law drugs, try and get clean. If you do, get the animation right. And then get the moon's 28 day cycle on the animation.  If you notice the earth's inverse square law cannot explain the moon's galactic speed changes, you have something much more real than your gravity wave hoaxes to deliver to the attention of your next lecture theatre. 

Picture

​A thought provoking discovery about the universe is in the wings for you. Looking like gravity fields are going to be malleable inverse square law particles falling around adjacent ones like ductile force bubbles as they all change speed through space in their ever changing directions.​ Radio telescopes have never been all that good with words. But there is a new picture of the universe ahead for you.
​
Picture

​Winning the satellite race without taking into account the 45,000 miles per hour of the earth's gravity field was a super second place for earth communists. The common sense answer to Sputnik 1 was high altitude descent in a moving inverse square law becomes an open ended yo yo rhythm. You just have to remove Captain UnfortunateGlitch's goofy ascent vector from the planet/satellite and attach it to the sun/planet and start again, this time using common sense about gravity and the fact that Captain UnfortunateGlitch's direction of up required the application of force.

And today, with all this GPS stuff happening on your earth, the question is how good can Captain WayToStupid's theories really fall. Decreasing inverse square law magnitudes making clocks run faster or clocks travelling at different speeds running at different rates is human sense. On an in flight movie kindergarten trailer "here the teacher goes again" was once heard. That would have been when the warm and cuddly vhs projector innocently spruiked time as the fourth dimension.

What your unbuckled hopefully not to drugged stained seat belts are saying is Sputnik 1 did not go into its predicted 'orbit'. Your world had as much of Captain Albert WayToStupid's fixed inverse square law theories as it was ever going to get by then. Trial and error, inverse square laws in motion and big bags of government sponsor money would seem to do more for your space shots than conceptual theories about a fixed inverse square law union between three dimensional space and then time attached as a fourth dimension. And, of course, those particle accelerators of yours have proved that particles can be accelerated and nothing much else beyond your need to slow your mathematical physics professor production to a quickest of halts.


The weather is fine. Captain Batman InFlightMoves has just landed the big bird and it's on an apple. The big one. Tricky touchdown but all the tall buildings are missed. 
​
Picture


​This is your local radio telescope helping you discern the day lengths of the planets of the solar system. Those traffic lights maybe incontinent. But they seem to be sure that day lengths considerations can fully correct any flight path problems your pilots maybe currently experience around tall buildings. As you know, these ones were eventually crashed into by earth pilots still ignorant about the motion of the sun.
​
****WEEK 8