Hello.

Knowing that mathematical physics is out of tune with reality does not require great intelligence. All that is needed is an ability to see the moon can not 'pull' water away from itself. And that planets can not go up in the sun's gravity field.

On the other side of this falseness is wider arithmetical knowledge about gravity fields being unique and not conjoined.

A little further along is the realization that the turn rates of planetary inverse square laws (gravity fields) is the key to the turn rates of the planets themselves. The 24 hours in an earth day and the 24 hours in a Mars day are going to factors of each other.

As much as no one is likely to take any original notice of this, it's worth the effort of presenting the case. If, perchance, mathematical physicists and professors in general wake up to the mistakes they propagate, a seminal moment akin to the Copernican revolution should enter world affairs. Today's academia with its fixed sun explanation of planetary motion is not dissimilar to the hierarchy that maintained the earth is fixed in the centre of the universe centuries ago.

georgekingston59@gmail.com

Knowing that mathematical physics is out of tune with reality does not require great intelligence. All that is needed is an ability to see the moon can not 'pull' water away from itself. And that planets can not go up in the sun's gravity field.

On the other side of this falseness is wider arithmetical knowledge about gravity fields being unique and not conjoined.

A little further along is the realization that the turn rates of planetary inverse square laws (gravity fields) is the key to the turn rates of the planets themselves. The 24 hours in an earth day and the 24 hours in a Mars day are going to factors of each other.

As much as no one is likely to take any original notice of this, it's worth the effort of presenting the case. If, perchance, mathematical physicists and professors in general wake up to the mistakes they propagate, a seminal moment akin to the Copernican revolution should enter world affairs. Today's academia with its fixed sun explanation of planetary motion is not dissimilar to the hierarchy that maintained the earth is fixed in the centre of the universe centuries ago.

georgekingston59@gmail.com

## introduction

Hello. If you have known mathematical physics is a falsity since you were taught Sir Isaac Newton's laws at school, when you get to sensible answers to the tides and planetary motion you more or less have an obligation to introduce yourself to the world. Knowing that mathematical physics is out of tune with the tides and planetary motion does not require great intelligence. All that is needed is an ability to see the moon couldn't 'pull' water away from itself to cause the high tide on the side of the earth away from the moon. And that planets couldn't be going both up and down at the same time.

Believe it or not every particle in the universe has never mathematically or physically attracted every other particle in the universe. Since its inception Sir Isaac Newton's law of gravity has carried a simple childlike oversight. Opposite directions of 'gravity' precludes a small particle from being an accelerator of a large particle towards itself.

Believe it or not every particle in the universe has never mathematically or physically attracted every other particle in the universe. Since its inception Sir Isaac Newton's law of gravity has carried a simple childlike oversight. Opposite directions of 'gravity' precludes a small particle from being an accelerator of a large particle towards itself.

Beyond the life of Sir Isaac a discernment of the rotation rates of the other planets has gradually been entering astronomy. The closest planet to earth, Venus, is suspected to be in some sort of rotation lock with the earth.

This stems from three Venus days observed to occur during every two earth years. That lock most plausibly extends to other adjacent pairs of planets. The high tide solar axis of one planet looks like it enters the orbit of the next planet in as its low tide axis and thus the inner planet's forward motion relative to the sun is along a tidal axis of an outer planet.

On top of an apparent lock between the earth and Venus, the similarity of adjacent day lengths is hard to ignore.

Unequivocally, mutual gravitation would be best excluded from secondary school pass mark standards. As well as academics ignoring Sir Isaac's third law down at the centre of the earth, the ongoing teaching of Sir Isaac's fixed earth cannonball satellitic logic is academic stupidity.

If the most is to be made of life on earth, going back to the laws of Sir Isaac Newton is a necessary academic chore. As well as a mutual gravitation of the universe being a mathematical impossibility, 'inertial' mass is not the reason of uniform motion or lack thereof. Through the Copernican revolution and Sir Isaac's first law of motion, when mathematicians like Albert Einstein think and talk they do so without realizing that momentum is arithmetically uniform, that the words 'inertia' or 'inertial mass' are unfortunate mistakes of academic history.

georgekingston59@gmail.com