​Expecting Sir Isaac to return to the earth to explain why he thought multiplying the earth by an apple was the way to comprehend the universe may be a little bit much. [[break=1000]]He seems to be lost in his own maize.[[break=1000]]So lets see if we can  tidy up after the mess of this confused Englishman from the past and those who have since accepted his fruit planet multiplication as valid science.[[break=2000]]Oh dear. [[break=1000]]This is going to be quite boring.[[break=1000]] Unless you are a school teacher or a professor wedded to a multiplication of the earth and an apple, you might as well tune out.[[break=1000]] If you do drift off, thanks to the moon you now have the principle of  equal and opposite high tides in your keeping as you go about the rest of your life.[[break=1000]]Professors, it is not being said that your academic world does not have a true principle of gravity in your keeping. [[break=1000]]This is it here.[[break=1000]]As you can see.[[break=1000]]It only relates to one mass and a rate of acceleration towards that mass.

This has to be done if we are ever going to straighten up life on this planet that we call irthe.((⏱️=1000))So we will need to be discussing inverse square fall rate diminishment. ((⏱️=1000))Whether you are a professor in charge of the science of the planet or a concerned bystander who has not drifted off to do other things, the inverse square law should be the right and proper place to begin our discussion about the obstacle Sir Isaac Newton has been to understanding the earth's gravity field and its tides a little bit better. ((⏱️=1000))So here we have our satellite view of the irthe. ((⏱️=1000))The growing circle you will see around the planet is a depiction of its gravity field.((⏱️=1000))The size of the diminishing arrows is a representation of the rate of fall towards the earth that the earth's gravity field is causing at the distance of the arrow from its center.((⏱️=1000))As you can see the rate is decreasing as a direct proportion of the area increase of the gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))The white numbers represent distance from the center of the planet. ((⏱️=1000)) The red number one and the fractions beyond it represent the rate of fall towards the planet at  the distance from its center of each white number. ((⏱️=1000))Strictly the area increase is not a two-dimensional circle as it appears here. ((⏱️=1000))It is the three dimensional curved surface of a curved spherical shape around planet irthe.<emphasis level="strong"></emphasis>((⏱️=1500))If you are not an academic, it is hoped you are able to follow the way the irthe's gravity field  has a relationship between distance above and a decreasing rate off fall rate towards itself at least a little bit. 

If you have earned the right to enter a university you should have already learnt this. ((⏱️=1000))Unfortunately many leave their universities without this basic understanding. ((⏱️=1000))Historically and in an ad hoc way,  this gravity field truth was deduced from what is known as Kepler's third law.((⏱️=1000))Johannes Kepler was a German born in fifteen seventy one. ((⏱️=1000))His mother was accused of having made a pact with the devil. ((⏱️=1000))Of being a witch.((⏱️=1000))  Johannes took to lawyering and eventually got her off.((⏱️=1000))She wasn't any kind of witch after all.((⏱️=1000)) Afterwards Johannes returned to his fixed sun planetary motion analysis. ((⏱️=1000))With all due respects to Johannes and his innocent mother, educationally it is rather good to now know that the sun is moving around a galaxy as this two dimensional animation of the  world year shows us.((⏱️=2000))Anyway, as this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law in its full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=1000))You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun multiplied by itself and then multiplied by the planet's average distance from the sun produces a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system.((⏱️=1000))Moving away from the sun, the first column contains the planets.((⏱️=1000)) Mercury, Venus, earth etcetera. ((⏱️=1000))The next column is V. ((⏱️=1000))The average velocity of a planet relative to the sun.((⏱️=1000))The one after is Vee multiplied by Vee or Vee squared.((⏱️=1000))Then d. ((⏱️=1000))The average distance of the planet from the sun.((⏱️=1000))The final column is V squared multiplied by d.((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the changing positions of the planets that had been written down by a Danish man who had his nose half cut off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1000))Teeco Bra hay was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000))Bra hay's night time recordings stand as the best naked eye observations of the planets against the background stars ever. ((⏱️=1000))As the table completes, you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle tune of the diminishment  of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac and others.((⏱️=1000))How about that. ((⏱️=1000))And, of course, pigs do not fly yet.

​So here we have Sir Isaac Newton's untrue law of gravity. [[break=1000]]The one that our overall interpretation of the universe is being held to. [[break=1000]] In werrd form it reads every particle in the universe attracts every other particle in the universe with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.[[break=1000]]If that seems to be a mouthful to the uninitiated, this passage from Sir Isaac's works is more so.[[break=1000]] If you can manage to follow it through, you will see that Sir Isaac disqualifies himself, or, more particularly his followers, from believing that Sir Isaac was a man with an understanding of the gravity of the universe.

So that is Sir Isaac's confession of not understanding how gravity gets from one body to another red out by a modern man in a forest.((⏱️=1000)) After his confession is published, in seventeen twenty seven Sir Isaac dies. ((⏱️=1000)) He becomes enshrined in the Westminster abbey in London.((⏱️=1000))From there scholarship accepts that Sir Isaac had understood the gravity of the universe.((⏱️=1000)) The message to modern man would be to start solar system science again. ((⏱️=1000))At the moment we will not concern ourselves with relative motions.((⏱️=1000))But gravity fields are moving faster than the relative orbital motions that they are causing.((⏱️=1000)) Whether it happens soon at the behest of today's academics. ((⏱️=800)) or sometime later through future youth, a recognition of orbital relativity will be part of a fresh start for solar system science. ((⏱️=1000))The new world of scholarship will also require an acknowledgement of  Sir Isaac Newton's admission of not understanding gravity beyond the existence of the inverse square law and a relationship between quantity and gravity strength. ((⏱️=1000))That is what we are dealing with here at the moment.((⏱️=1000)) The current scholastic obligation is to consider the tides of the earth in the context of the  equal and opposite forces of the earth and not occurring in the several ways that have emanated from Sir Isaac's confession of ignorance. ((⏱️=1000)) When you understand the tides properly you can easily see that Sir Isaac's basic  mistake was assessing that an inverse square law could potentially extend an infinite distance from a source particle.    ((⏱️=1000))   Contrarily and Wear direction of fall is alternating in between two bodies, generic moon shot  arithmetic  is saying gravity fields inflict regional terminations upon each other. ((⏱️=1000)) An isolated gravity field is not subject to an indefinite extension that potentially goes forever. ((⏱️=1000))So you can easily know that following Sir Isaac's gravity is wing and a prayer solar system science.((⏱️=1000))Mathematically he has not been on the right trail when it comes to the way two adjacent gravity fields interact with each other .((⏱️=1000))Good science is always prepared to check for and then address any mistakes.((⏱️=1000))Bad science continues on regardless. ((⏱️=1000))If you are a modern man, thank you for allowing me the temerity to say this to you from this Costa Rican beach.((⏱️=1000))If you or anyone is bored, I am very sorry.((⏱️=1000))For better or worse, this monotonous correcting Sir Isaac task is just something that has to be done.((⏱️=1000))The more people pitching in to help with a modern clarification of the tides that come in and go out on this shore, the better for the future of mankind and the rest of the planet.

It is inconceivable, that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact. That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent, acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Contrarily and Wear direction of fall is alternating in between two bodies, generic moon shot  arithmetic  is saying gravity fields inflict regional terminations upon each other. ((⏱️=1000)) So, before concerning ourselves with the overall senselessness of Sir Isaac's formula, such regional gravity terminations are the first base reason Sir Isaac's formula was always foundationally false. ((⏱️=1000))To the point, qualified mathematicians on earth  are yet to develop a way of explaining how inverse square laws or gravity fields re build a direction of fall beyond a termination of that direction of fall. ((⏱️=1000)) For Sir Isaac's formula to be of meaning, a real mathematician would have to be able to demonstrate that a particle located where the X has appeared on this earth moon diagram can fall towards the moon because of the moon's inverse square law. ((⏱️=1000))The figures are for when the earth and moon are at there average separation.((⏱️=1000)) In the making of the point the sun's gravity field is left out of this picture.. ((⏱️=1000))But until a certified mathematician demonstrates the rebirth of an inverse square law beyond such a calculated termination, Sir Isaac's every particle in the universe formula should never be taught as a truth of the universe to the young people of the earth.((⏱️=1000))In mathematical physics, the end of a vector is the end of a vector.((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac should have known or understood this. ((⏱️=1000))Over extended direction of fall vectors exist in current scholarship without any mathematical substance.

​​[[break=1000]] Unfortunately this boring stuff must continue for a little while.[[break=1000]] But we do want to get scholarship beyond believing the multiplication of every mass in the universe by every other mass in the universe is the mathematical structure of the universe.  [[break=1000]]As we have been discussing, when you apply simple reason to adjacent opposite directions of fall, a  basic question arises. ((⏱️=1000))How can any gravity field experience an indefinite continuity beyond a calculation of its termination.  [[break=1000]] Unless that question can be answered satisfactorily, the multiplication of masses together  is meaningless.((⏱️=1000))Regrettably,  the multiplication is also being used as a deceptive come malicious extender of all gravity fields through space.((⏱️=1000))When Sir Isaac admitted he didn't know how gravity could exist in space, he should not of proposed that multiplying masses together solved the issue. ((⏱️=1000))Through understanding the tides properly, normal folk and professors alike have the opportunity to happily move our view of the universe past Sir Isaac's mass multiplication law.[[break=1000]]

((⏱️=1000))So now we will kindly point out something that should be obvious to all modern academics. ((⏱️=1000))Only Newton's true law of gravity is involved in calculating  the universal constant in what are known as Cavendish experiments. ((⏱️=1000)) With these  experiments, the large mass is always fixed. ((⏱️=1000)) That disqualifies the experiments from having to do with Newton's theoretical mutual force of gravitation between any two masses of the universe.. ((⏱️=1000)) The large mass would need to be observed to accelerate and a measurement of that  acceleration entered into the calculation for the experiments to qualify as a mutual gravitation experiment. ((⏱️=1000))Further disqualification from a mutual gravitation experiment is the cancelling out of the small masses during the calculation.  ((⏱️=1000))As experimenters understand, the constant is calculated by setting Newton's second law equal to his law of universal gravitation. ((⏱️=1000))When this is done, the small masses cancel out and the equation is reduced to or returned to being Newton's true law of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))Which is all the experiments relate to. ((⏱️=1000))

​[[break=2000]]Here you can see a Cavendish experiment with a small mass moving towards a large mass in a time lapse video.[[break=1000]]With these  experiments, the large masses are always fixed. [[break=1000]] That disqualifies the experiments from having to do with Newton's theoretical mutual force of gravitation between any two masses of the universe.. [[break=1000]] The large masses would need to be observed to accelerate and a measurement of that  acceleration entered into the calculation for the experiments to qualify as a mutual gravitation experiment. [[break=1000]]The complete disqualification is the cancelling out of the small masses when the calculation is being done.  [[break=1000]]As experimenters acknowledge and understand, the constant is calculated by setting Newton's second law equal to his law of universal gravitation. [[break=1000]]Later we will explain what Newton's second law happens to be for those unfamiliar with it. [[break=1000]]For now when a setting equal to Newton's second law is being done, you can see the reduction to Newton's true law of gravity is immediate. [[break=1000]]In his original reasoning, Cavendish contended what he believed to be the earth's centripetal acceleration directed towards the sun could be used in a roundabout way to assess the density of the earth. [[break=1000]]This made the earth the small mass or the small m of Newton's universal gravitation formula. [[break=1000]]And large M the mass of the sun.[[break=1000]] You can see in the upper line of his equation, small m is present on both sides of the equation. [[break=1000]]When the small masses are cancelled out as the second line appears, once again what is left is Newton's true law of gravity with a concept of centripetal acceleration in place of an actual measurable acceleration due to gravity. [[break=1500]] As disconcerting as this next three line progression may appear to untrained eyes, it relates to an  actual experiment like this one that you saw before.[[break=1000]]In the middle line you can see small m on either side of the equation again. [[break=1000]]It is  denoted as small m 1. [[break=1000]]In the bottom line where large G, the universal constant is being calculated, the small mass has died in action as it were and is no longer with us.[[break=1000]]Thus, the magnitude  of the small mass is irrelevant to the manifestation of the gravity constant of the universe that has been recognized by earth science for several centuries now.[[break=2000]]

​[[break=1000]]So The key points about the experiments are  firstly. [[break=1000]]The large masses do not accelerate.[[break=1000]] Consequently there is no mutual acceleration or mutual force observed.[[break=1000]]Secondly, the magnitude of the small masses are irrelevant to the value of the constant.[[break=1000]]The small masses are akin to a thermometer in the air or a tape measure in a builders hands. [[break=1000]]They measure but are not measured.[[break=1000]]As is the clear observation in a Cavendish experiment, the constant has only ever related to acceleration towards one mass.[[break=1000]] Not two as is the specific when it is professed to be the constant of Newton's law of universal gravitation.[[break=1000]]

​((⏱️=1000))To keep things straight, before further critique of Newton's problematic mass multiplication view of the universe, we should mention this surprise.((⏱️=1000)) It looks like the moon has already left the earths gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac's  failure to consider the mutually limiting outcome of opposite directions of fall lying along an axis that runs between the moon and the earth for example is one result.  ((⏱️=1000))A further finding is the system of calculations revealing the blunder also reveal the moon to be outside the earth's gravity field.((⏱️=1000))The moon is measured to be moving away from the earth by a few centimeters each year anyway((⏱️=1000))But already left. ((⏱️=1000))Surely not is a respectful reaction. ((⏱️=1000))Afterall, the moon's behavior is consistent with still being in the earths gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))Well, that is not the complete truth.((⏱️=1000))Relative to the rest of the universe, the moon's momentum  is principally related to the motion of the sun's gravity field. ((⏱️=1000)) Not the earths. ((⏱️=1000))Whether or not the calculations and rationale behind the calculation are correct, without doubt at some stage the moon will  leave the immediate proximity of the earth and become another planet of a newly configured solar system. ((⏱️=1000))The question of intrigue is will the moon leave the earth Mars side.((⏱️=1000))Or will it go Venus side. ((⏱️=1000))If the calculations are of a sound basis, they can only really be explained through a new or post existing mathematical physics view of the gravity of the universe.((⏱️=1000))Through gravity fields being particles made of undetectable mineute natural particles of space.((⏱️=1000)) If you have not entered a state of complete disbelief, more about that topic later. ((⏱️=1000))Moving gravity field or orbital relativity is a subject of its own.((⏱️=1000))

​Isaac Newton devised his law of universal gravitation  by combining established observational data from Kepler and Galileo with his own mathematical developments (that is calculus and the laws of motion) to show that terrestrial gravity and celestial motion are governed by the same force. He realized that gravity is not just a downward force on Earth, but a mutual universal attraction that decreases with the square of the distance. 

​When we get a little further advanced, we will see that the physics of circular motion are irrelevant to understanding what we currently and wrongly regard as the circular orbital motions of the solar system.[[break=1000]] The planets are really pendulums of the sun swinging across the speed of the sun.[[break=1000]] They do this  because of their constant falling in the motion of the sun's gravity field. [[break=1000]]Without the motion of the sun, there would be no orbits at all.  [[break=1000]]From what we have here from the world computer service, Sir Isaac equates the earth's gravity at the moon with the moon's suspected centripetal acceleration that is directed towards the earth as a key part of his mutual gravitation formulation.[[break=1500]] Goodness gracious me. [[break=1000]]We have been trying to avoid  fully bringing the motion of a gravity field into planetary motion. [[break=1000]]The wish has been to leave that until mutual gravitation could no longer be accepted by a scholar of good world conscience as they go about their teaching and scholarly days here on earth. [[break=1000]] The simple first passion is to not have mutual gravitation fettering considerations of the high and low tides being the equal and opposite downward forces of planet earth. [[break=1000]] But it's no good just fondling around the edges of planetary motion anymore. [[break=1000]]Not now that the world computer service has brought centripetal acceleration into the solar system picture. [[break=1000]]To begin our proper embrace of planetary motion, we will head off to Newton's troublesome first law of motion and even two thousand years before that was implemented into scholarship. [[break=1000]]Back to ancient Greece and Aristotle's ideas about motion is where our corrective dialogue will need to go. [[break=1000]]