​Expecting Sir Isaac to return to the earth to explain why he thought multiplying the earth by an apple was the way to comprehend the universe may be a little bit much. [[break=1000]]He seems to be lost in his own maize.[[break=1000]]So lets see if we can  tidy up after the mess of this confused Englishman from the past and those who have since accepted his fruit planet multiplication as valid science.[[break=2000]]Oh dear. [[break=1000]]This is going to be quite boring.[[break=1000]] Unless you are a school teacher or a professor wedded to a multiplication of the earth and an apple, you might as well tune out.[[break=1000]] If you do drift off, thanks to the moon you now have the principle of  equal and opposite high tides in your keeping as you go about the rest of your life.[[break=1000]]Professors, it is not being said that your academic world does not have a true principle of gravity in your keeping. [[break=1000]]This is it here.[[break=1000]]As you can see.[[break=1000]]It only relates to one mass and a rate of acceleration towards that mass.

This has to be done if we are ever going to straighten up life on this planet that we call irthe.((⏱️=1000))So we will need to be discussing inverse square fall rate diminishment. ((⏱️=1000))Whether you are a professor in charge of the science of the planet or a concerned bystander who has not drifted off to do other things, the inverse square law should be the right and proper place to begin our discussion about the obstacle Sir Isaac Newton has been to understanding the earth's gravity field and its tides a little bit better. ((⏱️=1000))So here we have our satellite view of the irthe. ((⏱️=1000))The growing circle you will see around the planet is a depiction of its gravity field.((⏱️=1000))The size of the diminishing arrows is a representation of the rate of fall towards the earth that the earth's gravity field is causing at the distance of the arrow from its center.((⏱️=1000))As you can see the rate is decreasing as a direct proportion of the area increase of the gravity field. ((⏱️=1000))The white numbers represent distance from the center of the planet. ((⏱️=1000)) The red number one and the fractions beyond it represent the rate of fall towards the planet at  the distance from its center of each white number. ((⏱️=1000))Strictly the area increase is not a two-dimensional circle as it appears here. ((⏱️=1000))It is the three dimensional curved surface of a curved spherical shape around planet irthe.<emphasis level="strong"></emphasis>((⏱️=1500))If you are not an academic, it is hoped you are able to follow the way the irthe's gravity field  has a relationship between distance above and a decreasing rate off fall rate towards itself at least a little bit. 

If you have earned the right to enter a university you should have already learnt this. ((⏱️=1000))Unfortunately many leave their universities without this basic understanding. ((⏱️=1000))Historically and in an ad hoc way,  this gravity field truth was deduced from what is known as Kepler's third law.((⏱️=1000))Johannes Kepler was a German born in fifteen seventy one. ((⏱️=1000))His mother was accused of having made a pact with the devil. ((⏱️=1000))Of being a witch.((⏱️=1000))  Johannes took to lawyering and eventually got her off.((⏱️=1000))She wasn't any kind of witch after all.((⏱️=1000)) Afterwards Johannes returned to his fixed sun planetary motion analysis. ((⏱️=1000))With all due respects to Johannes and his innocent mother, educationally it is rather good to now know that the sun is moving around a galaxy as this two dimensional animation of the  world year shows us.((⏱️=2000))Anyway, as this table develops, you will be seeing Kepler's third law in its full and most succinct glory.((⏱️=1000))You will see the average relative velocity of a planet to the sun multiplied by itself and then multiplied by the planet's average distance from the sun produces a nigh constant for each and every planet of the solar system.((⏱️=1000))Moving away from the sun, the first column contains the planets.((⏱️=1000)) Mercury, Venus, earth etcetera. ((⏱️=1000))The next column is V. ((⏱️=1000))The average velocity of a planet relative to the sun.((⏱️=1000))The one after is Vee multiplied by Vee or Vee squared.((⏱️=1000))Then d. ((⏱️=1000))The average distance of the planet from the sun.((⏱️=1000))The final column is V squared multiplied by d.((⏱️=1000))That is the constant Kepler found when he studied the changing positions of the planets that had been written down by a Danish man who had his nose half cut off in a sword fight. ((⏱️=1000))Teeco Bra hay was the Danish man.((⏱️=1000))Bra hay's night time recordings stand as the best naked eye observations of the planets against the background stars ever. ((⏱️=1000))As the table completes, you have both Kepler's third law and an insight into where the subtle tune of the diminishment  of a gravity field first began to be deduced by Sir Isaac and others.((⏱️=1000))How about that. ((⏱️=1000))And, of course, pigs do not fly yet.

​So here we have Sir Isaac Newton's untrue law of gravity. [[break=1000]]The one that our overall interpretation of the universe is being held to. [[break=1000]] In werrd form it reads every particle in the universe attracts every other particle in the universe with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.[[break=1000]]If that seems to be a mouthful to the uninitiated, this passage from Sir Isaac's works is more so.[[break=1000]] If you can manage to follow it through, you will see that Sir Isaac disqualifies himself, or, more particularly his followers, from believing that Sir Isaac was a man with an understanding of the gravity of the universe.

So that is Sir Isaac's confession of not understanding how gravity gets from one body to another red out by a modern man in a forest.((⏱️=1000)) After his confession is published, in seventeen twenty seven Sir Isaac dies. ((⏱️=1000)) He becomes enshrined in the Westminster abbey in London.((⏱️=1000))From there scholarship accepts that Sir Isaac had understood the gravity of the universe.((⏱️=1000)) The message to modern man would be to start solar system science again. ((⏱️=1000))At the moment we will not concern ourselves with relative motions.((⏱️=1000))But gravity fields are moving faster than the relative orbital motions that they are causing.((⏱️=1000)) Whether it happens soon at the behest of today's academics. ((⏱️=800)) or sometime later through future youth, a recognition of orbital relativity will be part of a fresh start for solar system science. ((⏱️=1000))The new world of scholarship will also require an acknowledgement of  Sir Isaac Newton's admission of not understanding gravity beyond the existence of the inverse square law and a relationship between quantity and gravity strength. ((⏱️=1000))That is what we are dealing with here at the moment.((⏱️=1000)) The current scholastic obligation is to consider the tides of the earth in the context of the  equal and opposite forces of the earth and not occurring in the several ways that have emanated from Sir Isaac's confession of ignorance. ((⏱️=1000)) When you understand the tides properly you can easily see that Sir Isaac's basic  mistake was assessing that an inverse square law could potentially extend an infinite distance from a source particle.    ((⏱️=1000))   Contrarily and Wear direction of fall is alternating in between two bodies, generic moon shot  arithmetic  is saying gravity fields inflict regional terminations upon each other. ((⏱️=1000)) An isolated gravity field is not subject to an indefinite extension that potentially goes forever. ((⏱️=1000))So you can easily know that following Sir Isaac's gravity is wing and a prayer solar system science.((⏱️=1000))Mathematically he has not been on the right trail when it comes to the way two adjacent gravity fields interact with each other .((⏱️=1000))Good science is always prepared to check for and then address any mistakes.((⏱️=1000))Bad science continues on regardless. ((⏱️=1000))If you are a modern man, thank you for allowing me the temerity to say this to you from this Costa Rican beach.((⏱️=1000))If you or anyone is bored, I am very sorry.((⏱️=1000))For better or worse, this monotonous correcting Sir Isaac task is just something that has to be done.((⏱️=1000))The more people pitching in to help with a modern clarification of the tides that come in and go out on this shore, the better for the future of mankind and the rest of the planet.

It is inconceivable, that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact. That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent, acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Contrarily and Wear direction of fall is alternating in between two bodies, generic moon shot  arithmetic  is saying gravity fields inflict regional terminations upon each other. ((⏱️=1000)) So, before concerning ourselves with the overall senselessness of Sir Isaac's formula, such regional gravity terminations are the first base reason Sir Isaac's formula was always foundationally false. ((⏱️=1000))To the point, qualified mathematicians on earth  are yet to develop a way of explaining how inverse square laws or gravity fields re build a direction of fall beyond a termination of that direction of fall. ((⏱️=1000)) For Sir Isaac's formula to be of meaning, a real mathematician would have to be able to demonstrate that a particle located where the X has appeared on this earth moon diagram can fall towards the moon because of the moon's inverse square law. ((⏱️=1000))The figures are for when the earth and moon are at there average separation.((⏱️=1000)) In the making of the point the sun's gravity field is left out of this picture.. ((⏱️=1000))But until a certified mathematician demonstrates the rebirth of an inverse square law beyond such a calculated termination, Sir Isaac's every particle in the universe formula should never be taught as a truth of the universe to the young people of the earth.((⏱️=1000))In mathematical physics, the end of a vector is the end of a vector.((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac should have known or understood this. ((⏱️=1000))Over extended direction of fall vectors exist in current scholarship without any mathematical substance.

​((⏱️=1000)) Unfortunately this boring stuff must continue for a little while.((⏱️=1000)) But we do want to get scholarship beyond believing the multiplication of the earth by every other mass in the universe is the sense of the earth and the universe.  ((⏱️=1000))As we have been discussing, when you apply simple reason to adjacent gravity fields, the mathematical question of how oppositely directed gravities penetrate each other arises. ((⏱️=1000))Unless the question of how gravity fields can possibly penetrate each other can satisfactorily be answered, we know where the world outlook on the universe has been sent off course by Sir Isaac a few centuries back ((⏱️=1000))Without understanding that the real question he was facing was that of how could gravity fields penetrate each other, Sir Isaac's admitted that he didn't have a clue about how gravity did its business((⏱️=1000))But then he went and multiplied masses together as how the gravity business is done. ((⏱️=1000))If you are asking why he did this, well answers use confident language to glaze the gaps.