Yes. But isn't the world round. Not stretched out like this.
Okay. ((⏱️=500)) So where are the high tides?((⏱️=500)) I must leave on the high tide. ((⏱️=500))I am going to France.((⏱️=500))<emphasis level="reduced"> I will drink champagne when I get there.</emphasis>
Wow. Two high tides.((⏱️=500)) And on direct opposite sides of the earth. <emphasis level="strong">How can that be?</emphasis>
But where is the moon?((⏱️=500))<emphasis level="strong"> Is the moon drinking champagne too?</emphasis>
I will get the breathalyzer. <emphasis level="strong">The moon my be over the limit. </emphasis>
This is the moon speaking. It is you on earth who need the breathalyzer. ((⏱️=500))Our gravity fields are reducing each other's fall rate. ((⏱️=500))I am not pulling you at all.((⏱️=1000))This Newtonian vector here is a complete mathematical mistake. <emphasis level="reduced">A bad one</emphasis>.((⏱️=800)) My gravity does not actually reach your ocean.
Sir Isaac Newton did not make any mistakes thank you very much. ((⏱️=800)) He saw an apple fall. ((⏱️=800))Then he understood the gravity of the universe.((⏱️=800)) Please no more insults to your betters.
Good idea. ((⏱️=800)) See you tomorrow.((⏱️=500)) First let me put the moonshot vectors in. ((⏱️=800))You will notice where our respective gravity fields end. ((⏱️=800))That is as far as a direction of fall towards me mathematically extends.((⏱️=1200)) Unfortunately your no mistakes man over extended my gravity.((⏱️=800)) Sorry and <emphasis level="reduced">Goodnight.</emphasis>
So this is where Apollo eleven left the earth's gravity field and then entered<emphasis level="strong"> the moon's gravity field. </emphasis>
The rocket scientists say an object is not falling to either the earth or the moon when it is here. ((⏱️=800))Both rocket scientists and tidal scientist would surely be considering that space is changing in directional nature where that yellow mark is.
The glaring standout is the high tide is not under the moon.((⏱️=1000)) Not mathematically.((⏱️=1000)) Mathematically the high tide is under a calculation of zero. ((⏱️=1000))Unfortunately Sir Isaac with his apple has not taken note of such a tidal basic of our universe when he traipsed off into that law of universal gravitation that you all worship so much.((⏱️=500))I'm off to the beach.((⏱️=1000)) A melon does not need a moon to explain the tides.((⏱️=500))Goodbye.
It is starting to look like the moon((⏱️=500)) and even that passing melon are right. ((⏱️=800))The high tide under the moon has tricked the outstanding mathematical genius of Sir Isaac Newton into missing a simple mathematical tidal truth.
The high tide under the moon has tricked my mathematical genius.((⏱️=800)) <emphasis level="strong">Bother.</emphasis>((⏱️=800)) I hope the world is okay.
Good morning. ((⏱️=1000))Well, Sir Isaac.((⏱️=800)) Your add mission of gravity termination oversight is well noted.((⏱️=1000)) Enjoy that apple. ((⏱️=1000))Now Let us see if we can bring the tides to life in junior school science around the world through some simple relativity.
For a start the zero rate of fall that you calculate when you take a shot at me from your planet is an alternation of a direction of fall indicator.((⏱️=800)) Zero as a number does not exist.
Next, if you will allow me, a lateral fall rate vector gets put in place. ((⏱️=1500))When we join this latitudinal vector with a diagonal to the mathematically shortened longitudinal one that we already have, you can see the reason of this high tide through relative fall rates at points equidistant from the center of the earth.((⏱️=1000))At the point marked X there is an absence of a fall rate.((⏱️=1000)) At the point marked Y there is a fall rate. ((⏱️=1000))The fall rate difference between X and Y is the mathematical reason of the high tide facing the moon.((⏱️=1000)) Mathematically high tides on the facing sides of adjacent bodies are a result of a termination of each gravity at a point along an axis that runs between the centers of the two bodies. ((⏱️=1000)) This renders Sir Isaac's and Albert Einstein's non eccentric models of gravity fields substantially redundant.((⏱️=1000))But that's not important at the moment.((⏱️=1000))Not teaching Sir Isaac's mistaken vector to the next generation. ((⏱️=1000))That's what's important right now.
Next, if you will allow me, a green lateral fall rate vector gets put in place on our developing diagram. ((⏱️=1500))Then we do a diagonal joining of this latitudinal vector to the mathematically shortened vector at a right angle to it that we already have. ((⏱️=1000)) With that done you are walking through a looking glass away from Sir Isaac and into seeing the real reason of your high tide facing my humble self((⏱️=1000))X and Y are equidistant from the center of the earth.((⏱️=1000)) At X there is an absence of a fall rate.((⏱️=1000)) At Y there is a fall rate. ((⏱️=1000))The fall rate difference between X and Y is the mathematical reason of what you call your moon close high tide.((⏱️=1000)) Mathematically high tides on the facing sides of adjacent bodies are a result of a mutual termination of each gravity at a point along an axis that runs between the centers of the two bodies. ((⏱️=1000)) This renders Sir Isaac's and Albert Einstein's non eccentric models of gravity fields substantially redundant.((⏱️=1000))But that's not important at the moment.((⏱️=1000))Not teaching Sir Isaac's mistaken vector to the next generation. ((⏱️=1000))That's what's important right now.((⏱️=1000))To begin the future of scholarship, a moment's silence to grieve Sir Isaac's mistaken vector.
Next, if you will allow me, a green lateral fall rate vector gets put in place on our developing diagram. ((⏱️=1500))Then we do a diagonal joining of this latitudinal vector to the mathematically shortened vector at a right angle to it that we already have. ((⏱️=1000)) With that done you are walking through a looking glass away from Sir Isaac and into seeing the real reason of your high tide facing my humble self((⏱️=1000))X and Y are equidistant from the center of the earth.((⏱️=1000)) At X there is an absence of a fall rate.((⏱️=1000)) At Y there is a fall rate. ((⏱️=1000))The fall rate difference between X and Y is the mathematical reason of what you call your moon close high tide.((⏱️=1000)) Mathematically high tides on the facing sides of adjacent bodies are a result of a mutual termination of each gravity at a point along an axis that runs between the centers of the two bodies. ((⏱️=1000)) This renders Sir Isaac's and Albert Einstein's non eccentric models of gravity fields substantially redundant.((⏱️=1000))But that's not important at the moment.((⏱️=1000))Not teaching Sir Isaac's mistaken vector to the next generation. ((⏱️=1000))That's what's important right now.((⏱️=1000))To begin the future of scholarship, a moment's silence to grieve Sir Isaac's mistaken vector.
Are you sure grieving is what we should be doing right now? ((⏱️=800)) Recognizing an over extended vector that has been confusing professors about changing ocean heights for three hundred years. ((⏱️=800))Dancing in the streets sound better to me.((⏱️=1500)) Anyway, the moon definitely is inducing a relative mathematical and discernible fall rate effect at a right angle in the earth's gravity field.((⏱️=800)) And that effect is the high and the low tides we see at the beach during a day's bathing.((⏱️=1000))Do you think professors will still be confused?
Some will be as confused as ever.((⏱️=1000)) Unfortunately once you fall under the spell of Newton's apple story, ((⏱️=800))you are stuck on a million wayward mathematical pages about the universe.((⏱️=800))That's a lot of wrong pages to get off before getting into the simple mathematical reality of opposite directions of fall being the mathematics of these high tides. ((⏱️=2000))If you say grief silence is unsuitable, a quiet moment to let the diagram sink inn. ((⏱️=4000))Dance in the streets if your professors say that's okay.((⏱️=1000))Otherwise as you were.((⏱️=1000))Professors are the boss of your world.
This is much good ado about one high tide. ((⏱️=1000)), What about the high tide on the direct opposite side of our planet. ((⏱️=1000))How can that ever mathematically be. ((⏱️=1000))It is rising against the direction of fall towards the moon.
Before that, it should be mentioned this is only an in principle explanation of the high tide facing my distant self.((⏱️=1000))The sun's gravity is being ignored at this stage.((⏱️=1000))When that big boy is brought into the picture, the situation becomes more wondrous. ((⏱️=1000))The principle of this first high tide being a lateral effect induced in the earth's gravity field is nevertheless unaffected by the addition of the sun. ((⏱️=800))Now this other high tide. ((⏱️=1000))This is where your Sir Isaac Newton comes back into the picture. ((⏱️=1000))You understand it's existence through his third law. ((⏱️=1000))To every force there is an equal and opposite force. ((⏱️=1000)) If you subject a ball to Newton's third law with a squeeze, you can see you create the tidal shape of the earth.
Now this other high tide. ((⏱️=1000))This is where your Sir Isaac Newton comes back into the picture. ((⏱️=1000))You understand it's existence through his third law. ((⏱️=1000))To every force there is an equal and opposite force. ((⏱️=1000)) If you subject a ball to Newton's third law with a squeeze, you can see you create the tidal shape of the earth.
If Newton's third law is a true law of physics, the downward forces on direct opposite sides of your planet must equalize. ((⏱️=1000))This squeezed ball is the antithesis of your planet. ((⏱️=1000))Your planet is reduced forces creating tidal bulges.((⏱️=1000)) The squeezed ball is increased forces causing the ball to become elongated.
Well Mister Armstrong never said anything about a stupid old man coming out of the moon.((⏱️=800)) And now he is going back in.
At least he provided a good ball squeezing demonstration while he was out. ((⏱️=1000))Those other school teacher ideas we have about the second high tide never made much sense. ((⏱️=1000))They reverse the moon's direction of fall through deceit and both depended on the moon's gravity having the mathematical ability to reach the earth..((⏱️=800))Which a moon shot calculation demonstrates it doesn't have.
That is true. ((⏱️=1000))The smaller of an adjacent pair of gravity fields is mathematically contained within a larger. ((⏱️=1000))That is the basic that Sir Isaac has been depriving you of for the last three hundred years. ((⏱️=1000)) With respect of the upper diagram here, there is no joint earth moon center of gravity. ((⏱️=1000))That unthought through idea will fall by the wayside for you when you get to the flawed and faulty structure of Newton's universal gravitation formula and also get as far as the relative motions of gravity fields. ((⏱️=1000)) That relative motion phenomena most plausibly explains what are currently considered to be Barry centers. ((⏱️=1000))For now the fact that your professors and academics have two teachings to explain the second high tide should be telling you that you are still searching for its answer.((⏱️=1000))Neither of these solutions has been able to push the other away. ((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac considered his reasoning about the second high tide to be a weak point in his work.((⏱️=1000))It was the lower one of these two ideas.((⏱️=1000))Now you have a third rationale about the reason of the second high tide. ((⏱️=800))This third rationale cannot be wrong if Newton's third law is a true law of physics. ((⏱️=1000))
Once you are seeing the first high tide through moon shot arithmetic and not a direct pull from me, the third or equal and opposite force solution quickly becomes unavoidable.((⏱️=1000)) If Sir Isaac had of considered his third law to be the solution he was looking for, you can only wonder what life on earth would be like today. ((⏱️=1000)) It should be mentioned that the reaction high tide is, mathematically, a slightly lesser one.((⏱️=1000)) Its reduced fall rate begins at the center of the earth's gravity field and is not subject to the same equidistant termination point as the one under me is.
This is all a revelation.((⏱️=800)) I wonder how an inverse square law, altered as it is, is structured into the space that surrounds the mass of the earth. ((⏱️=800))To a mathematician this should be an interesting renaissance.
By any measure it should be.((⏱️=1000)) We will just have to see. ((⏱️=1000))Sir Isaac was not wrong about everything.((⏱️=1000)) His mistakes by omissions can be stated as the motions, rotations and finite sizes of gravity fields.((⏱️=800)) Your mathematicians are yet to deal with any of these gravity field aspects.((⏱️=800))Each aspect is a spark to ignite life on earth in its own right. ((⏱️=1000))You have another discovery that your mathematicians are ignoring at the peril of your geoscience as well.
And what would that be. ((⏱️=800))We do know that cows do not really jump over you.
No. Nothing bovine like that.((⏱️=800)) You dig gold mines as far under your cows as four kilometers. ((⏱️=800))As you descend in these mines you measure what you should.((⏱️=1000)) A decreasing rate of acceleration towards the center of your planet.((⏱️=1000)) Meaning if Sir Isaac's apple could fall to the center of the earth, its rate of fall would be measured to be decreasing to zero as it fell all the way down there. ((⏱️=1000))Your mathematical world is ignoring this observation.
Well it may cause a black hole rethink so I can understand their decision to be ignorant about it.((⏱️=1000)) You are not saying that black holes are figments of mathematical imaginations are you?
What is being said is achieve a succinct understanding of the high and low tides that you observe at a beach before attributing any gravity understanding to phenomena you observed light years away.((⏱️=1000)) I am only your humble moon but tides first.
In true mathematics our respective cores are weightless. ((⏱️=1000))Fall rates terminate where opposite directions of fall give way to each other.((⏱️=1000)) Believe it or not, it is surface weight holding your planet upon its core.((⏱️=1000))Before adjusting your scholarship to gravity being what it is, a rate of fall embedded in space, what you need to know is Sir Isaac's mass multiplication belief about the gravity of the universe was an ill conceived nonsense from yesterday year.
Like with the second high tide, your mathematicians are not clear headed about why Sir Isaac decided to multiply the earth by his apple to create a force.((⏱️=1000)) It would be good if he could return and explain how he got off track. ((⏱️=1000))His law of universal gravitation is just a manipulation of his second and third laws.((⏱️=1000))It is not a sensible law of the universe.((⏱️=1500))Anyway my high tide explanation work is done here.((⏱️=1000))Good night planet earth. ((⏱️=800))Looking forward to your next landing.((⏱️=800))Bring your putter.
Well thank you moon for taking the time to explain both of the high tides and with such plainness. ((⏱️=1000))I am sure class rooms on every island and continent will lead the world in a better direction from here.((⏱️=1000))Let's just hope Sir Isaac can return and explain the thought process that led to a multiplication of an apple and the earth together.((⏱️=1000)) Finite gravity field arithmetic definitely says he has done something shockingly wrong.((⏱️=1000)) Good night to you too. ((⏱️=800))Sweet dreams and all that.((⏱️=800))We will just have to wait and see if Sir Isaac returns to his planet.
All that follows stems from flaws in our Copernican revolution picked
up at school in the late sixties of last century. The flaws were the
explanation of the second high tide. Also the reason the planets are
suspended above the sun.
Two decades of honest professors and the revolution can be repaired.
Alternative is the world continues as it is. It's mistakes aside, the main
things missing from the revolution are sizes, rotations and motions
of gravity fields. All a lot simpler than it sounds. Kids stuff really.
up at school in the late sixties of last century. The flaws were the
explanation of the second high tide. Also the reason the planets are
suspended above the sun.
Two decades of honest professors and the revolution can be repaired.
Alternative is the world continues as it is. It's mistakes aside, the main
things missing from the revolution are sizes, rotations and motions
of gravity fields. All a lot simpler than it sounds. Kids stuff really.