**realistic second high tide understanding**

****

In clear light of day, the tides of the earth are quite simple. According to Sir Isaac Newton's third law, to every force there is an equal and opposite force. If that law is true,

The mystery is actually

**the core of the earth is in a constant state of achieving equal forces on direct opposite side of itself.**Reasonably obviously that core of the earth physics is the high and low tides we observe up here on the surface of the earth.The mystery is actually

**not**why we observe equal and opposite high and low tides around the earth. The mystery is how opposite rates of acceleration are adjusting to each other across the core of the earth. With respect of Sir Isaac's original high tide explanation, the answer is**lateral**earth inverse magnitudes. Not**longitudinal**lunar inverse relative magnitudes.Varying as the earth and moon separation varies, the earth - moon inverse square law tidal arithmetic

**perpetually**exists in space about 350,000 kilometres above the earth on the earth - moon axis.

This perpetual droplet of ocean acceleration in neither direction point

**to a point equidistant from the centre of the earth but at a right angle to the earth - moon axis explains to mathematical geniuses and also the rest of us why we observe a high tide under the moon. And low tides at a right angle to the earth - moon axis.**

__relative__The reason of the high tide on the other side of the earth then becomes apparent to all who learn of Sir Isaac's third law as the equal and opposite or Newton third law high tide.

****

As the earth turns, essentially its tides are equal and opposite weight pairs continually adjusting to each other across the centre of the planet.

Almost inarguably, that's our basic explanation of why planets experience high tides 180 degrees apart. Succinctly.................

1/ If Newton's third law is a true science

+

2/ If Newton's second law is a legitimate weight measuring tool

then

3/ Newton third law equal and opposite forces/weights across the centre of the earth is the correct explanation of observed concurrent opposite tidal pairs up here on the surface of the earth.

When the sun's inverse square law is brought into the picture, which inverse square law is contained within which inverse square law becomes complex.

**the core of a planet or star is weightless**

The evidence supporting weightless cores is the rate of acceleration towards the centre of the earth is measured as

**diminishing**in underground ore extraction exercises. Gold mines, etc. Meaning not only do inverse square laws arithmetically conclude / are interrupted where they meet an adjacent one. Inverse square laws arithmetically reverse inside the celestial body that they are causing a descent towards. Going down from the surface of the earth, the arithmetical expectation is the rate of fall tapers to conclusion across the centre of the planet.Once moonshot arithmetic is done and accepted, the discovered lateral difference in inverse square law magnitudes can only help with the way mathematical geniuses use the inverse square in their calculations.

Apart from black holes not having an arithmetical foundation and increased probability of the moon having once been the centre of the earth, the important weightless core implication is a planet's inverse square law is set at the planet's surface. More precisely the setting radius of an inverse square law is or would be where the rate of acceleration towards a planet's centre starts to

The next step with inverse square law understanding is or would be considerations of how mass causes the basis of an inverse square law in the space

Apart from black holes not having an arithmetical foundation and increased probability of the moon having once been the centre of the earth, the important weightless core implication is a planet's inverse square law is set at the planet's surface. More precisely the setting radius of an inverse square law is or would be where the rate of acceleration towards a planet's centre starts to

**decrease**towards the zero that it arithmetically should be across the centre of the planet.The next step with inverse square law understanding is or would be considerations of how mass causes the basis of an inverse square law in the space

**above**mass. An inverse square law above mass says the nature of three dimensional space above a mass is changing with the inverse square of vertical distance increased.The following analogy is imperfect. A better one may be found. To tune in with the across centre tidal dynamics of this beautiful almost round planet, squeezing party balloons should help.

Providing a coherent teaching of the tides should be worth the effort to institutes of learning. Relative to the wonder of computers and the abilities of modern medicine to raise health levels around the world, to still be indoctrinating academic pass mark standards with the moon 'pulls' an ocean under the moon = junior classrooms need to begin considering lateral or moonshot differences in inverse square law magnitudes.

Probably should be mentioned that Newton's third law is not really a law of motion. It is only to do with opposite forces. Also and given Archimedes principle is based upon it, it has come down through the ages to Newton.