​Mathematicians or mathematical physicists will never understand the universe while they play footsie with zero and infinity. ((⏱️=1000))This video will not deal specifically with the universe mathematically being what lies in between the dual impossibilities of zero space and infinite space.((⏱️=1000))For better or worse it is a revolutionary video that explains the tides through finite gravity and what is known as Newton's third law.((⏱️=1000))In doing so it renders current concepts about gravity to be sloppy and unfinished.((⏱️=2000))

 For example the question of whether or not gravity has an infinite range.. ((⏱️=1000))Categorically gravity does not have an infinite scope. ((⏱️=1000))Any direction of fall extending in the direction of  X on this particular diagram does not contain or encompass any distance that extends from the particle in direction Y. ((⏱️=1000))In mathematics any distance that does not account for all distance is sub infinite. ((⏱️=1000))Thus the current idea of gravity potentially being an infinite extension from its source particle is not mathematically feasible. ((⏱️=1000))The possibility  needs removing from the syllabus.((⏱️=1000))At this stage our gravity science is based on a presumption that all gravities can coexist throughout the universe unimpacted by each other. ((⏱️=1000))For instance these several directions of fall here are presumed to coexist in current mathematical physics.  ((⏱️=1000)) This video and explanation of the tides is based on such being mathematically lazy and, more importantly, incoherent with respect of an alternation of the direction of fall that occurs along an axis that runs between the two sources. ((⏱️=1000))Tracing the explanation of the high tide, the one facing the moon, back at least as far as Sir Isaac Newton, the world at large is suffering a mathematical physics confusion between a lesser ocean weight directed towards the earth with a direct pull from the moon.  ((⏱️=2500))Getting the finite nature of a gravity field rationalized for junior scholarship and, in turn, future mathematical physics orientated towards reality may lead to an understanding of the day lengths of the planets through understanding the shapes and inter related rotations of their gravity fields((⏱️=1000))Current mathematics or mathematical physics is essentially moribund when it comes to the topic of the day lengths of the planets.((⏱️=1000)) The similar rotation rates of Mars and the earth should be enjoying much more earthly intrigue than what it currently does. ((⏱️=1000))So as much as the contemporary world has cherishment of the oversights of Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton and what they supposedly provide, giving the world a fresh gravity direction should be doing the world a bit of good.((⏱️=1000))If what is written in the rotation cause column of this table is a touchstone of the universe, the required revolution of scholarship will have direction.((⏱️=2000))