Making YEAR ZERO the upcoming 8 planet cluster gives
all religions an opportunity to get on the same PLANET.
(could be better unifying ideas.)
(2024 = 468, 2025 = 467, 2026 = 466, etc.)
j 8, F 10, M 12, A 13
08/03/2025 $3,875,075 $3,878,037 $3,880,843 $3,882,394 $3,885,340 $3,884,677
09/83/2025 $3,888,017 $3,847,172 $3,844,320 $3,843,126 $3,839,093 $3,839,952
10/03/2025 $3,847,859 $3,847,971 $3,848,083 $3,847,113 $3,850,485
11/03/2025 $3,778,778 $3,775,871 $3,779,919 $3,778,404
12/11/2025 $3,778,921 $3,745,388 $3,749,505 $3,747,299 $3,750,174
13/11/2025 $3,750,802 $3,764,545
14/11/2025 $3,764,498
17/11/2025 $3,790,866 $3,796,492
18/112025 $3,794,909 $3,790,955 $3,785,139 $3,785,030
19/11/2025 $3,786,645 $3,777,852 $3,774,589
20/11/2025 $3,775,307
08/03/2025 $3,875,075 $3,878,037 $3,880,843 $3,882,394 $3,885,340 $3,884,677
09/83/2025 $3,888,017 $3,847,172 $3,844,320 $3,843,126 $3,839,093 $3,839,952
10/03/2025 $3,847,859 $3,847,971 $3,848,083 $3,847,113 $3,850,485
11/03/2025 $3,778,778 $3,775,871 $3,779,919 $3,778,404
12/11/2025 $3,778,921 $3,745,388 $3,749,505 $3,747,299 $3,750,174
13/11/2025 $3,750,802 $3,764,545
14/11/2025 $3,764,498
17/11/2025 $3,790,866 $3,796,492
18/112025 $3,794,909 $3,790,955 $3,785,139 $3,785,030
19/11/2025 $3,786,645 $3,777,852 $3,774,589
20/11/2025 $3,775,307
Sir Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation is his second law. Or his second law twice. It was never a law of gravity at all. Many years ago it seemed cute to be the first one on a planet to understand the tides. Or it did for a few days. So it was fitting that there was an element of cuteness to the way that understanding was eventually communicated to the planet. If you have watched the first video, that is a way of explaining that the moon will not be the one elucidating how Sir Isaac came up with a mass multiplication formula for the gravity of the universe. I will be doing it personally and without the assistance of other personalities.
Now the law of gravity you see here I attribute to Sir Isaac. If it wasn't Sir Isaac, it would have been one of his peers that first put it forward. This law of gravity is the reason the more complex one we are taught at school is taken to be the truth of the universe. It is contained within that one and it is the only part of that more complex one that is ever used when it comes to ascertaining the masses of other planets and celestial bodies.
From the junior school physics point of view, the lack of clarity in both Newton's gravity and Einstein's later theory is how does mass, a scalar quantity, cause an acceleration, a vector quantity, towards its self.((⏱️=2000)) When I was at school that was what I wanted to learn. But the teacher wasn't interested in teaching that. Later I found out that Sir Isaac's point of view on the matter can be summarized as I haven't got a clue. In fairness he stated I will leave it to my readers to decide this matter.
Einstein was apparently aware of the dilemma Sir Isaac left behind. He proposed that gravity was not a force. But comes about due to the impact of mass upon space and time. According to Einstein, space was not material. Time is not material. So Einstein was on the immaterial side of Sir Isaac's dilemma. But there was still no explanation how the material of mass causes this vector towards its self. Space and time are not vector quantities. But the acceleration towards mass, or gravity, that is a vector quantity.((⏱️=1500)) If you aren't a professor or a physicist you maybe in wonder about the difference between a vector quantity and a scalar quantity. Well in junior school physics we are taught that a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be expressed. A scalar quantity is expressed through magnitude alone. ((⏱️=1000))Here is a list of each.
Now the law of gravity you see here I attribute to Sir Isaac. If it wasn't Sir Isaac, it would have been one of his peers that first put it forward. This law of gravity is the reason the more complex one we are taught at school is taken to be the truth of the universe. It is contained within that one and it is the only part of that more complex one that is ever used when it comes to ascertaining the masses of other planets and celestial bodies.
From the junior school physics point of view, the lack of clarity in both Newton's gravity and Einstein's later theory is how does mass, a scalar quantity, cause an acceleration, a vector quantity, towards its self.((⏱️=2000)) When I was at school that was what I wanted to learn. But the teacher wasn't interested in teaching that. Later I found out that Sir Isaac's point of view on the matter can be summarized as I haven't got a clue. In fairness he stated I will leave it to my readers to decide this matter.
Einstein was apparently aware of the dilemma Sir Isaac left behind. He proposed that gravity was not a force. But comes about due to the impact of mass upon space and time. According to Einstein, space was not material. Time is not material. So Einstein was on the immaterial side of Sir Isaac's dilemma. But there was still no explanation how the material of mass causes this vector towards its self. Space and time are not vector quantities. But the acceleration towards mass, or gravity, that is a vector quantity.((⏱️=1500)) If you aren't a professor or a physicist you maybe in wonder about the difference between a vector quantity and a scalar quantity. Well in junior school physics we are taught that a vector quantity requires both magnitude and direction to be expressed. A scalar quantity is expressed through magnitude alone. ((⏱️=1000))Here is a list of each.
Just to conclude, if mathematical physicists do not understand that the high tide under the moon is simply a mathematically induced reduced fall rate towards the earth, we are not on a path to an honest relationship with the rest of the universe as yet. Furthermore, at this hour of the earth and quite obviously, if the moon does not pull an ocean to cause that high tide under the moon, any nation that teaches that it does to its young people is committing a crime against current and future humanity. The world needs a leader and it's our young people learning the high tide under the moon afresh. Not our old world ivory tower mathematical physicists and their Newton come Einstein misunderstandings of both high tides. That second high tide on the side of the earth away from the moon clearly is the equal and opposite reaction across the core of the earth to the one on the moon close side. ((⏱️=500))And that is bigger and better world news than a convicted criminal dictating the welfare of the planet. Let's hope this good news is able to circulate. ((⏱️=1000))If you can understand the message of this video, around the world balls need squeezing. Through ball squeezing, perhaps on the streets or even on television but with the tides in mind, this video does have the potential to change the world into a much happier frame of mind. ((⏱️=1000)) I must now begin making the next video. With thanks to AI for sorting my speech difficulties out, I am necessarily introducing myself to the world as its best so far tidal analyst. My name is unimportant but I was born in Australia 70 plus years ago. ((⏱️=1500))Is this image annoying or amusing? I am not sure but anyway, if an image of the protagonist helps, that is from about a year ago. ((⏱️=500))About three hundred and fifty years before that, Sir Isaac Newton got the tides wrong. Because of all the dictators and dictatorial attitudes that have followed him, we, or our young people, have a very hard road ahead. Priority decisions are not always easy ones in a time of peril. But teaching the tides honestly is very important for the long term future of this planet. ((⏱️=1500)) Slava Ukraini
This diagram says that junior schoolbook or Newtonian physics needs a rewrite. It says that the moon does not actually pull the ocean under the moon to cause a high tide. In terms of pure mathematical reasoning, that high tide is a consequence of opposite directions of fall causing both earth and moon fall rates to be relatively reduced. Then, more importantly as far as world news goes, the high tide on the direct opposite side of the earth is the equal and opposite reaction to the one on the moon close side.
If this is the correct analysis of why we observe high and low tides, it is the biggest celebratory news the world has ever had.((⏱️=500)) Hence the post stone age reference.((⏱️=1000))
Whether or not anybody is interested in Newtonian physics being politely rewritten, I don't know. But I think I can do it on YouTube and move the world to a calmer state as far as human animosities go. The caveat is the cost. That cost being having to look at mathematical physicists as more given to the cult of personality than to the truth of the universe. Today the personality of the cult is not just Sir Isaac Newton. More so it is Albert Einstein. So, if you want Albert Einstein to be an unquestionable personality of celestial matters, physics will never be rewritten. However if this diagram shows the principle of why we observe the high and low tides that we do, it can only be said that both Newton and Einstein lived their lives without understanding the why of the high and low tides of the earth at all. So hope you can find the time to follow along. If this tidal diagram gets to be the educational standard of the world, that should be a good path for nations to be following along as they deal with their sovereign welfares in the coming centuries.
Well, it is three hundred and fifty odd years post apple.
Today this may or may not have
explained both high tides in a way
that makes good sense to future
junior classrooms . Whichever and
with a bit of luck more to come.
As a point of difference to the
way the world is currently
going, all need not be lost to
dictators and tyrants.
With appropriate jounalistic intent,
the power of a squeezed ball on
a computer screen may
immediately release the world
from the hold the Newtonian
view of the universe has on the
unordered actions of men.
Sincerely hope to be back with
an in depth explanation of why
every particle in the universe is
not attracting every other
particle in the universe. And
day length/gravity field rotation
rate analyis after that. Few other
things in the fresh view sector
as well.
In life, trust begins with honest
teachers. In general teachers are
trustworthy. They just need to stop
teaching the tides through Sir
Isaac Newton.
Cheers
G.K.
This diagram says that junior schoolbook or Newtonian physics needs a rewrite. It says that the moon does not actually pull the ocean under the moon to cause a high tide. In terms of pure mathematical reasoning, that high tide is a consequence of opposite directions of fall causing both earth and moon fall rates to be relatively reduced. Then, more importantly as far as world news goes, the high tide on the direct opposite side of the earth is the equal and opposite reaction to the one on the moon close side.
If this is the correct analysis of why we observe high and low tides, it is the biggest celebratory news the world has ever had.((⏱️=500)) Hence the post stone age reference.((⏱️=1000))
Whether or not anybody is interested in Newtonian physics being politely rewritten, I don't know. But I think I can do it on YouTube and move the world to a calmer state as far as human animosities go. The caveat is the cost. That cost being having to look at mathematical physicists as more given to the cult of personality than to the truth of the universe. Today the personality of the cult is not just Sir Isaac Newton. More so it is Albert Einstein. So, if you want Albert Einstein to be an unquestionable personality of celestial matters, physics will never be rewritten. However if this diagram shows the principle of why we observe the high and low tides that we do, it can only be said that both Newton and Einstein lived their lives without understanding the why of the high and low tides of the earth at all. So hope you can find the time to follow along. If this tidal diagram gets to be the educational standard of the world, that should be a good path for nations to be following along as they deal with their sovereign welfares in the coming centuries.
Well, it is three hundred and fifty odd years post apple.
Today this may or may not have
explained both high tides in a way
that makes good sense to future
junior classrooms . Whichever and
with a bit of luck more to come.
As a point of difference to the
way the world is currently
going, all need not be lost to
dictators and tyrants.
With appropriate jounalistic intent,
the power of a squeezed ball on
a computer screen may
immediately release the world
from the hold the Newtonian
view of the universe has on the
unordered actions of men.
Sincerely hope to be back with
an in depth explanation of why
every particle in the universe is
not attracting every other
particle in the universe. And
day length/gravity field rotation
rate analyis after that. Few other
things in the fresh view sector
as well.
In life, trust begins with honest
teachers. In general teachers are
trustworthy. They just need to stop
teaching the tides through Sir
Isaac Newton.
Cheers
G.K.
As a point of difference to the way the world is currently tracking, all need not be lost to dictators and tyrants. With appropriate journalistic intent, the power of a squeezed ball on a computer screen may quickly release the world from the hold the untruthful Newtonian view of the universe. Remember Sir Isaac himself said he did not have a clue how gravity got from A to B. So his confusion between force and fall rate is understandable.
Sincerely hope to be back with an in depth explanation of why
every particle in the universe is not attracting every other
particle in the universe. And day length/gravity field rotation rate analysis after that. Few other things in the fresh view sector as well.
In life, trust begins with honest teachers. In general teachers are
trustworthy. They just need to stop teaching the tides through Sir
Isaac Newton.
Sincerely hope to be back with an in depth explanation of why
every particle in the universe is not attracting every other
particle in the universe. And day length/gravity field rotation rate analysis after that. Few other things in the fresh view sector as well.
In life, trust begins with honest teachers. In general teachers are
trustworthy. They just need to stop teaching the tides through Sir
Isaac Newton.
Which is the most important to deal with first?
Newton’s lie about the gravity of the universe.
Or the tides through vectors and not that
magical lunar reach that is yet to make any
mathematical sense? First let me introduce
myself. I am somebody Newton and Einstein
were not. A simple genius. Those others were
both mathematical geniuses. They knew
nothing except how to employ the universe
to make 1 + 1 = 2 as complex an equation as
possible. A simple genius is someone who
likes truth. More so believes truth is the only
plausible solution to those in positions of
power tossing out unchecked lies. The ones
that poison honest people into distraction
while the liar continues to rule the roost. You
may be a simple genius too. First to deal with
is Newton’s barefaced lie about the gravity of
the universe.
No one in the current world is likely to believe this.
A pity as that may be, Sir Isaac Newton has
misunderstood the universe. He did this when he
accepted the idea that the high tide under the moon
is the result of a direct gravitational pull by the
moon. According to the vectors, it is a consequence
of the interactions of the opposite directions of
earth and moon gravities along the axis that runs
between the earth and the moon centres. When you
get into wanting to understand the tides at a
personal level, this becomes inarguable.
For the free world, though, if it wishes to remove a
false belief out of its systems of education, it will
not be easy. It means all mathematical physicists,
including Albert Einstein, are not honest scholars
of vectors or the universe.
A pity as that may be, Sir Isaac Newton has
misunderstood the universe. He did this when he
accepted the idea that the high tide under the moon
is the result of a direct gravitational pull by the
moon. According to the vectors, it is a consequence
of the interactions of the opposite directions of
earth and moon gravities along the axis that runs
between the earth and the moon centres. When you
get into wanting to understand the tides at a
personal level, this becomes inarguable.
For the free world, though, if it wishes to remove a
false belief out of its systems of education, it will
not be easy. It means all mathematical physicists,
including Albert Einstein, are not honest scholars
of vectors or the universe.
Chapter 1
I
.
Chapter 2
I
.
Chapter 2
In the beginning there was nothing. Or so the religious story went. There was really space, though. And space was not nothing. Space was length, width, breadth and believe. Nothing would be an absence of the three dimensions. In reality the religious story was unable to explain what an original nothing could be. Thus the foundation of religion was a folly of mankind.
Space was expanding at infinite rate into a size beyond comprehension. Then it naturally stopped. The right angles between length width and breadth were all exactly born in an instant. The evolution of infinite distance was taking on a new form. Space had ended on the outside. On the inside the relationship between the circumference and the diameter was mathematically inexact. The fracturing of space into three dimensional particles in motion was beginning. A crude universe of matter and momentum were simultaneously born. The calculation of a number of infinite length began. It is to be the ratio between the circumference and it’s diameter The first digits of this number were 3.1459. The calculation is performed by length width and breadth fracturing into particles of length, width As the number expanded the infinite expansion evolved into partculate matter the man came to be he first called this birth to be the supernatural. He was yet to understand geometry and science. he called the supernatural God and God had created man in the image of God in the centre of all things. it all made sense to man . Later when man worked out that the earth wasn't fixed in the centre of all things he mused that the supernatural might be a bang. A big one. The supernatural though was the end of the expansion of space and the beginning of equal and opposite forces. The expansion of space was one force. Its opposite the limit.
Space was expanding at infinite rate into a size beyond comprehension. Then it naturally stopped. The right angles between length width and breadth were all exactly born in an instant. The evolution of infinite distance was taking on a new form. Space had ended on the outside. On the inside the relationship between the circumference and the diameter was mathematically inexact. The fracturing of space into three dimensional particles in motion was beginning. A crude universe of matter and momentum were simultaneously born. The calculation of a number of infinite length began. It is to be the ratio between the circumference and it’s diameter The first digits of this number were 3.1459. The calculation is performed by length width and breadth fracturing into particles of length, width As the number expanded the infinite expansion evolved into partculate matter the man came to be he first called this birth to be the supernatural. He was yet to understand geometry and science. he called the supernatural God and God had created man in the image of God in the centre of all things. it all made sense to man . Later when man worked out that the earth wasn't fixed in the centre of all things he mused that the supernatural might be a bang. A big one. The supernatural though was the end of the expansion of space and the beginning of equal and opposite forces. The expansion of space was one force. Its opposite the limit.
Hello. the first lesson involves the sun. The question of whether or not the sun always has its gravity. The idea of these lessons is not to cause future splits between the highly educated and the not so highly educated. Currently the highly educated believe the sun can be considered to not have it's gravity when understanding why the planets are going around the sun.
What a gravity field is
tidal shape of the earth
understanding the tides is our connection with the universe
biggest positive news
an ocean cannot be weighted in two directions at once
explain the tides
centre of the earth weightless
existing tidal ideas
miracle
orbital speed of next planet out in the next planet in
far fetched
inner 3 table
outer planets
conjunction
tidal shape of the earth
understanding the tides is our connection with the universe
biggest positive news
an ocean cannot be weighted in two directions at once
explain the tides
centre of the earth weightless
existing tidal ideas
miracle
orbital speed of next planet out in the next planet in
far fetched
inner 3 table
outer planets
conjunction
|
|
|
|
1/ Tides/every particle in the universe is not attracting every other particle in the universe.
2/ Gravity fields in motion/sorting out Newton's first law of motion.
3/ Geometric mathematical understanding of the impossibility of infinite 3D distance/time/conservation of energy.
4/ Evolution. Sexual mechanic/life after death question
2/ Gravity fields in motion/sorting out Newton's first law of motion.
3/ Geometric mathematical understanding of the impossibility of infinite 3D distance/time/conservation of energy.
4/ Evolution. Sexual mechanic/life after death question
1/ If Newton's third law is a true science
+
2/ If Newton's second law is a legitimate weight measuring axiom
then
3/ Newton third law equal and opposite forces / weights across the centre of the earth is the correct explanation of observed concurrent like opposite tidal pairs up here on the surface of the earth.
+
2/ If Newton's second law is a legitimate weight measuring axiom
then
3/ Newton third law equal and opposite forces / weights across the centre of the earth is the correct explanation of observed concurrent like opposite tidal pairs up here on the surface of the earth.